Efficient Communication of Automated Vehicles and Manually Driven Vehicles Through an External Human-Machine Interface (eHMI): Evaluation at T-Junctions | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Efficient Communication of Automated Vehicles and Manually Driven Vehicles Through an External Human-Machine Interface (eHMI): Evaluation at T-Junctions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2021 - Posters (HCII 2021)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1421))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The absence of a human driver in an automated vehicle (AV) raises new challenges in communication and cooperation between road users, especially for ambiguous situations where road users would like to communicate their intention explicitly. This paper investigates the effect of a novel external human-machine interface (eHMI) which was designed to address this issue by signaling the AV’s intention through a 360° LED light-band mounted outside of the AV. In a simulator study an eHMI interaction strategy was implemented that should convey the message “I am giving way” to a manually driven vehicle operated by participants waiting at a t-junction. The experimental study incorporated three t-junction scenarios where the AV had always the right of way but may yield to a driver waiting at the intersection. The intention of the AV was communicated either implicitly (braking) or implicitly and explicitly (braking and eHMI). It was analyzed whether participants would understand the AV’s intention and accept the gap provided in front of the AV. Through participants’ subjective ratings the understandability, the usability and the acceptance of the eHMI solution were evaluated. The results showed that the majority of participants (85%) understood the meaning of the eHMI signal after two interactions. Initial gap acceptance results showed a positive effect of the eHMI solution. The presence of an eHMI improved participants perceived safety and trust. Subjective ratings for usability and acceptance indicated that participants perceived this eHMI interaction strategy as easy to use and were willing to communicate with an AV in this way. The results of the present study will be used to investigate the beneficial impact of this eHMI interaction strategy further in more complex traffic scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. On-Road Automated Driving (ORAD) Committee: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles (2021). https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_202104/

  2. Bansal, P., Kockelman, K.M.: Forecasting Americans’ long-term adoption of connected and autonomous vehicle technologies. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 95, 49–63 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fuest, T., Sorokin, L., Bellem, H., Bengler, K.: Taxonomy of traffic situations for the interaction between automated vehicles and human road users. In: Stanton, N.A. (ed.) AHFE 2017. AISC, vol. 597, pp. 708–719. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_68

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Dey, D., Habibovic, A., Löcken, A., et al.: Taming the eHMI jungle: a classification taxonomy to guide, compare, and assess the design principles of automated vehicles’ external human-machine interfaces. Transp. Res. Interdisc. Perspect. 7, 100174 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mahadevan, K., Somanath, S., Sharlin, E.: Communicating awareness and intent in autonomous vehicle-pedestrian interaction. In: Mandryk, R., Hancock, M., Perry, M., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Merat, N., Louw, T., Madigan, R., et al.: What externally presented information do VRUs require when interacting with fully Automated Road Transport Systems in shared space? Accid. Anal. Prev. 118, 244–252 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, Y.M., Madigan, R., Garcia, J., et al.: Understanding the messages conveyed by automated vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 134–143. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Madigan, R.: interACT D.6.3. Impact assessment of the new interaction strategies on traffic cooperation, traffic flow, infrastructure design and road safety (2020). https://www.interact-roadautomation.eu/wp-content/uploads/interACT D6.3_v1.0_FinalWebsite.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schieben, A.: Designing cooperative interaction of automated vehicles with other road users in mixed traffic environment (2017). https://www.interact-roadautomation.eu/. Accessed 20 Mar 2021

  10. Weber, F.: interACT D4.2 Final interaction strategies for the interACT Automated Vehicles (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fischer, M., Richter, A., Schindler, J., et al.: Modular and scalable driving simulator hardware and software for the development of future driver assistence and automation systems. In: New Developments in Driving Simulation Design and Experiments, pp. 223–229 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fitzpatrick, K.: Gaps accepted at stop-controlled intersections (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wilbrink, M.: interACT D1.1 definition of interACT use cases and scenarios (2018). https://www.interact-roadautomation.eu/wp-content/uploads/interACT_WP1_D1.1_UseCases_Scenarios_1.1_approved_UploadWebsite.pdf

  14. Brooke, J.: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In: Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B.A, McClelland, A.L. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry. Taylor, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. van der Laan, J.D., Heino, A., de Waard, D.: A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 5, 1–10 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(96)00025-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Franke, T., Attig, C., Wessel, D.: A personal resource for technology interaction: development and validation of the affinity for technology interaction (ATI) scale. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 35, 456–467 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1456150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sauro, J.: Measuring usability with the system usability scale (SUS) (2011). https://measuringu.com/sus/. Accessed 07 Mar 2021

  19. Lewis, J.R., Sauro, J.: The factor structure of the system usability scale. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCD 2009. LNCS, vol. 5619, pp. 94–103. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hüseyin Avsar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Avsar, H., Utesch, F., Wilbrink, M., Oehl, M., Schießl, C. (2021). Efficient Communication of Automated Vehicles and Manually Driven Vehicles Through an External Human-Machine Interface (eHMI): Evaluation at T-Junctions. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2021 - Posters. HCII 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1421. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78645-8_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78645-8_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78644-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78645-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics