Abstract
While there are numerous powerful tools to support Navy mission planning, the mission planning process still remains a hybrid planning activity across human operators and advanced tools. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have seen an increase in interest and use in the mission planning environment. Yet traditional approaches typically focus on optimizing the performance of the individual operator or the mission planning tool, not the joint problem solving that is needed for the human and AI team necessary in these envisioned mission planning environments. For example, while AI-based approaches can offload extensive processing by the human operator, outcomes of AI-based tools are seldom presented in ways that make it readily understand by a human or fit in with the overall process. This results in new and additional work for the operator as they must manually translate these outcomes into actionable information. There are also specific characteristics of AI-based approaches to consider, such as accounting for data limitations; many mission planning environments have data availability constraints or do not capture the right data. New methods are needed to specifically consider the benefits of AI-based approaches, ensure that AI derived insights are communicated effectively to operators, and optimally support operators in their own mission planning workflow.
In this paper, we describe an overall approach for incorporating AI into the mission planning process. First, to consider how best to leverage the unique capabilities and constraints of a human operator and artificial intelligence technologies as a cooperative team throughout the mission planning process, we will frame the human operator and AI system as a single unit and take a joint cognitive system (JCS) analysis approach. This approach will identify the key information to jointly create the most effective mission plan most efficiently. Next, we describe a novel approach, neural policy programs (NPPs) to address some of the critical challenges of incorporating AI into the mission planning process. Finally, we describe our approach for extending to the StarCraft II game and creating a pre-game planning stage to prototype our approaches.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A., Goodstein, L.P.: Cognitive Systems Engineering. Wiley, New York (1994)
Roth, E., Patterson, E., Mumaw, R.: Cognitive Engineering. Wiley, New York (2002)
Saiu, K., Wang, W.: Building trust in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and robotics. Bus. Technol. Digital Transform. Strateg. Data Anal. Digital Technol. 31(2), 47–53 (2018)
Jones, S.: Third Wave AI: The Coming Revolution in Artificial Intelligence (2018). https://medium.com/@scott_jones/third-wave-ai-the-coming-revolution-in-artificial-intelligence-1ffd4784b79e
Vinyals, O., et al.: Grandmaster level in Starcraft II using multi-agent reinforcement learning. Nature 575, 350–354 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1724-z
Roodt, J.H., Roux, H.: Applying reinforcement learning to the weapon assignment problem in air defence. Scientia Militaria S. Afr. J. Mil. Stud. 39, 123–140 (2011)
Thrun, S.: Efficient Exploration in Reinforcement Learning. Technical Report CMU-CS-92–102, Carnegie Mellon University (1992)
Bhatt, Shweta.: 5 Things You Need to Know about Reinforcement Learning (2018). https://www.kdnuggets.com/2018/03/5-things-reinforcement-learning.html
Deepmind.: AlphaStar: Mastering the Real-Time Strategy Game Starcraft II (2019). https://deepmind.com/blog/article/alphastar-mastering-real-time-strategy-game-starcraft-ii
Bellman, R.: Dynamic programming. Science 153(3731), 34–37 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.153.3731.34
Murre, J., Dros, J. Replication and analysis of ebbinghaus’ forgetting curve. PLoS One. 10(7), e0120644 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120644
Baker, B., et al.: Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent Autocurricula. ICLR. Paper presented at International Conference on Learning Representations, Virtual Conference, Apr 26–May 1 2020
Acknowledgements
This material is based upon work supported by the Naval Air Warfare Center under Contract No. (N68335-20-C-0769). Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NAVAIR.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kane, S., Moody, V., Harradon, M. (2021). Towards Incorporating AI into the Mission Planning Process. In: Degen, H., Ntoa, S. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in HCI. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12797. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77772-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77772-2_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77771-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77772-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)