Abstract
Open government data (OGD) initiatives for building OGD portals have not yet delivered the expected benefits of OGD to the whole of society. Although citizens’ reluctance to use OGD has become a key problem in the present OGD development, limited studies have been carried out to investigate citizens’ actual usage of OGD and OGD portals. In order to fill this research gap, this study primarily focuses on predicting citizens’ actual utilization of OGD portals. To find features influencing citizens’ utilization of OGD portals and to predict their actual usage of OGD portals, an experiment was designed and carried out in China. A predictive model was built with C5.0 algorithm based on data collected through the experiment, with a predictive accuracy rate of 84.81%. Citizens’ monthly income, the compatibility of OGD portals, and citizens’ attentiveness regarding their interactions with OGD portals are found to be the most important factors influencing citizens’ actual utilization of OGD portals. Positive effects of compatibility, attentiveness, and perceived usefulness on citizens’ usage of OGD portals are noticed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attard, J., et al.: A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(4), 399–418 (2015)
Graves-Fuenzalida, A.: Improving the use of open government data using visualizations, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (2013)
Meijer, A., de Hoog, J., van Twist, M., van der Steen, M., Scherpenisse, J.: Understanding the dynamics of open data: from sweeping statements to complex contextual interactions. In: Gascó-Hernández, M. (ed.) Open Government. PAIT, vol. 4, pp. 101–114. Springer, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9563-5_7
Cranefield, J., Robertson, O., Oliver, G.: Value in the mash: Exploring the benefits, barriers and enablers of open data apps (2014)
Horrigan, J.B., Rainie, L., Page, D.: Americans’ views on open government data. Pew Research Center (2015)
OpenDataBarometer: Open Data Barometer Leaders Edition: From Promise to Progress (2018)
Gauld, R., Goldfinch, S., Horsburgh, S.: Do they want it? Do they use it? The ‘demand-side’of e-government in Australia and New Zealand. Gov. Inf. Q. 27(2), 177–186 (2010)
Wang, D., Richards, D., Chen, C.: Connecting users, data and utilization: a demand-side analysis of open government data. In: Taylor, N.G., Christian-Lamb, C., Martin, M.H., Nardi, B. (eds.) iConference 2019. LNCS, vol. 11420, pp. 488–500. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_47
Ruijer, E., Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Meijer, A.: Open data for democracy: developing a theoretical framework for open data use. Gov. Inf. Q. 34(1), 45–52 (2017)
Safarov, I., Meijer, A., Grimmelikhuijsen, S.: Utilization of open government data: a systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Inf. Polity 22, 1–24 (2017)
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., Zuiderwijk, A.: Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Inf. Syst. Manage. 29(4), 258–268 (2012)
Ubaldi, B.: Open government data: towards empirical analysis of open government data initiatives. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, no. 22, p. 1 (2013)
Kassen, M.: A promising phenomenon of open data: a case study of the Chicago open data project. Gov. Inf. Q. 30(4), 508–513 (2013)
Weerakkody, V., Irani, Z., Kapoor, K., Sivarajah, U., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Open data and its usability: an empirical view from the Citizen’s perspective. Inf. Syst. Front. 19(2), 285–300 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9679-1
Rana, N.P., Dwivedi, Y.K., Williams, M.D.: A meta-analysis of existing research on citizen adoption of e-government. Inf. Syst. Front. 17(3), 547–563 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-013-9431-z
Huang, Z., Benyoucef, M.: Usability and credibility of e-government websites. Gov. Inf. Q. 31(4), 584–595 (2014)
Ruijer, E., et al.: Connecting societal issues, users and data scenario-based design of open data platforms. Gov. Inf. Q. 34, 470–480 (2017)
Wang, H.-J., Lo, J.: Adoption of open government data among government agencies. Gov. Inf. Q. 33(1), 80–88 (2016)
Carter, L., Belanger, F.: Citizen adoption of electronic government initiatives. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2004). IEEE
Chuttur, M.Y.: Overview of the technology acceptance model: Origins, developments and future directions. Working Papers Inf. Syst. 9(37): 9–37 (2009)
Zhang, S., et al.: A predictive model for assistive technology adoption for people with dementia. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inf. 18(1), 375–383 (2013)
King, W.R., He, J.: A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 43(6), 740–755 (2006)
Parycek, P., Hochtl, J., Ginner, M.: Open government data implementation evaluation. J. Theoret. Appl. Electron. Commerce Res. 9(2), 80–99 (2014)
Power, R., et al.: Scenario planning case studies using open government data. In: ISESS (2015)
Magalhaes, G., Roseira, C., Manley, L.: Business models for open government data. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (2014). ACM
Susha, I., Grönlund, Å., Janssen, M.: Driving factors of service innovation using open government data: an exploratory study of entrepreneurs in two countries. Inf. Polity 20(1), 19–34 (2015)
Gonzalez-Zapata, F., Heeks, R.: The multiple meanings of open government data: Understanding different stakeholders and their perspectives. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(4), 441–452 (2015)
Whitmore, A.: Using open government data to predict war: a case study of data and systems challenges. Gov. Inf. Q. 31(4), 622–630 (2014)
Veeckman, C., van der Graaf, S.: The city as living laboratory: empowering citizens with the citadel toolkit. Technol. Innovation Manage. Rev. 5(3) (2015)
Heise, A., Naumann, F.: Integrating open government data with stratosphere for more transparency. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 14, 45–56 (2012)
Murillo, M.J.: Evaluating the role of online data availability: the case of economic and institutional transparency in sixteen Latin American nations. Int. Polit. Sci. Rev. 36(1), 42–59 (2015)
Dwivedi, Y.K., Williams, M.D.: Demographic influence on UK citizens’e-government adoption. Electron. Gov. Int. J. 5(3), 261–274 (2008)
Venkatesh, V., Sykes, T.A., Venkatraman, S.: Understanding e-Government portal use in rural India: role of demographic and personality characteristics. Inf. Syst. J. 24(3), 249–269 (2014)
Venkatesh, V., et al.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003)
Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster, New York (2010)
Carter, L., Bélanger, F.: The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Inf. Syst. J. 15(1), 5–25 (2005)
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci. 46(2), 186–204 (2000)
Wu, P.F.: User acceptance of emergency alert technology: a case study. In: Proceedings of the 6th International ISCRAM Conference (2009)
Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319–340 (1989)
Sang, S., Lee, J.-D., Lee, J.: E-government adoption in ASEAN: the case of Cambodia. Internet Research 19(5), 517–534 (2009)
Taherdoost, H.: A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manufact. 22, 960–967 (2018)
Belanger, F., Hiller, J.S., Smith, W.J.: Trustworthiness in electronic commerce: the role of privacy, security, and site attributes. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 11(3–4), 245–270 (2002)
Lim, E.T., et al.: Advancing public trust relationships in electronic government: the Singapore e-filing journey. Inf. Syst. Res. 23(4), 1110–1130 (2012)
Venkatesh, V., et al.: Managing citizens’ uncertainty in e-government services: the mediating and moderating roles of transparency and trust. Inf. Syst. Res. 27(1), 87–111 (2016)
McKnight, D.H., Choudhury, V., Kacmar, C.: Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology. Inf. Syst. Res. 13(3), 334–359 (2002)
Cassell, J.: Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT press, Cambridge (2000)
Tickle-Degnen, L., Rosenthal, R.: The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychol. Inq. 1(4), 285–293 (1990)
Wei-Ern, J.W.: Establishing Rapport with Conversational Agents: Comparing the Effect of Envelope and Emotional Feedback (2012)
DMGLabFudanUniversity. China Open Data Index (2019). http://ifopendata.fudan.edu.cn/method
Atkinson, N.L.: Developing a questionnaire to measure perceived attributes of eHealth innovations. Am. J. Health Behav. 31(6), 612–621 (2007)
Fajar Marta, R.: Open Government Data Portal Design Principles: Implementing Transparency, Privacy, and Information Quality Assurance by Design (2016)
SunlightFoundation: Ten Principles for Opening Up Government Information (2010)
Thorsby, J., et al.: Understanding the content and features of open data portals in American cities. Gov. Inf. Q. 34(1), 53–61 (2017)
Bogdanović-Dinić, S., Veljković, N., Stoimenov, L.: How open are public government data? An assessment of seven open data portals. In: Rodríguez-Bolívar, M.P. (ed.) Measuring E-government Efficiency. PAIT, vol. 5, pp. 25–44. Springer, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9982-4_3
Ranjbartabar, H.: A virtual emotional freedom practitioner to deliver physical and emotional therapy (2016)
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J.: The Elements of Statistical Learning. SSS. Springer, New York (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7
Jiawei Han, M., Pei, J.: Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques: Concepts and Techniques. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2011)
CNNIC: The 45th China Statistical Report on Internet Development (2020). CNNIC
Cronbach, L.J.: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(3), 297–334 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
Tavakol, M., Dennick, R.: Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int. J. Med. Educ. 2, 53 (2011)
Bickmore, T., Cassell, J.: Social Dialongue with Embodied Conversational Agents. In: van Kuppevelt, J.C.J., Dybkjær, L., Bernsen, N.O. (eds.) Advances in Natural Multimodal Dialogue Systems Text, Speech and Language Technology, vol. 30, pp. 23–54. Springer, Dordrecht (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3933-6_2
Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M.: A coordination theory perspective to improve the use of open data in policy-making. In: Wimmer, M.A., Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J. (eds.) EGOV 2013. LNCS, vol. 8074, pp. 38–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40358-3_4
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wang, D., Richards, D., Bilgin, A.A., Chen, C. (2020). A Predictive Model for Citizens’ Utilization of Open Government Data Portals. In: Ishita, E., Pang, N.L.S., Zhou, L. (eds) Digital Libraries at Times of Massive Societal Transition. ICADL 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12504. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64452-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64452-9_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64451-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64452-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)