Pragmatic Software Maintainability Management Using a Multi-agent System Working in Collaboration with the Development Team | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Pragmatic Software Maintainability Management Using a Multi-agent System Working in Collaboration with the Development Team

  • Conference paper
Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Special Sessions, 17th International Conference (DCAI 2020)

Abstract

This paper introduces an ongoing PhD work that focuses on the design of a multi-agent system that would assess software maintainability in collaboration with human developers. Evaluation of the maintainability is difficult to implement on actual industrial projects as specific criteria cannot be easily adapted to the context of a project, and metrics are not always relevant to the architectural pattern in use. The metrics can be bypassed without improving the quality of the source code. We have the ambition to tackle this problem through a more modular, flexible and dynamic assessment system that will ultimately evolve through a dialogic interaction with the development team. Our approach will first lay the foundations of a shared vocabulary between the artificial agents and the human team. We will further develop a multi-agent system first by introducing feedback from the human team and second by moving towards a real dialogic interaction.

Supported by onepoint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 11439
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 14299
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aniche, M.F., Oliva, G.A., Gerosa, M.A.: What do the asserts in a unit test tell us about code quality? A study on open source and industrial projects. In: Cleve, A., Ricca, F., Cerioli, M. (eds.) 17th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, CSMR 2013, Genova, Italy, 5–8 March 2013, pp. 111–120. IEEE Computer Society (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/CSMR.2013.21

  2. Baggen, R., Correia, J.P., Schill, K., Visser, J.: Standardized code quality benchmarking for improving software maintainability. Softw. Qual. J. 20(2), 287–307 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-011-9144-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bakota, T., Hegedüs, P., Kortvelyesi, P., Ferenc, R., Gyimóthy, T.: A probabilistic software quality model. In: IEEE 27th International Conference on Software Maintenance, ICSM 2011, Williamsburg, VA, USA, 25–30 September 2011, pp. 243–252. IEEE Computer Society (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2011.6080791

  4. Boehm, B.W., Brown, J.R., Lipow, M.: Quantitative evaluation of software quality. In: Yeh, R.T., Ramamoorthy, C.V. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering, San Francisco, California, USA, 13–15 October 1976, pp. 592–605. IEEE Computer Society (1976). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=807736

  5. Gilpin, L.H., Bau, D., Yuan, B.Z., Bajwa, A., Specter, M., Kagal, L.: Explaining explanations: an overview of interpretability of machine learning. http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.00069v3

  6. Gordieiev, O., Kharchenko, V.S., Fominykh, N., Sklyar, V.V.: Evolution of software quality models in context of the standard ISO 25010. In: Zamojski, W., Mazurkiewicz, J., Sugier, J., Walkowiak, T., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Dependability and Complex Systems DepCoS-RELCOMEX, 30 June–4 July 2014, Brunów, Poland, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 286, pp. 223–232. Springer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guidotti, R., Monreale, A., Ruggieri, S., Turini, F., Pedreschi, D., Giannotti, F.: A survey of methods for explaining black box models. http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.01933

  8. Kitchenham, B.A.: What’s up with software metrics? - A preliminary mapping study. J. Syst. Softw. 83(1), 37–51 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2009.06.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mäntylä, M., Lassenius, C.: Subjective evaluation of software evolvability using code smells: an empirical study. Empirical Softw. Eng. 11(3), 395–431 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-006-9002-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sébastien Bertrand , Pierre-Alexandre Favier or Jean-Marc André .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bertrand, S., Favier, PA., André, JM. (2021). Pragmatic Software Maintainability Management Using a Multi-agent System Working in Collaboration with the Development Team. In: Rodríguez González, S., et al. Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Special Sessions, 17th International Conference. DCAI 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1242. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53829-3_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics