Abstract
Independent living of the elderly has its risks that can be decreased with the use of telecare systems. Smartphone telecare applications such as TeleStiki, are intended primarily for informal carers of independently living elders. The application is aimed at improving quality of life of both the elderly and their caregivers by reducing the caregiver burden and extending the time elders stay at home, while also increasing their safety. The aim of usability testing was to evaluate if users perceive the tested smartphone application as high in usability and user experience. The testing was also aimed at evaluating whether the use of application affects their attitude towards the use of telecare applications for informal care of their elderly relatives in general. In this study Task Completion, User Experience Questionnaire and System Usability Scale, as well as the Think-Aloud protocol has been performed. Results showed the application scores above average in usability and user experience. Findings gained in the qualitative study can be used as guidelines for future re-designs of the application and for improvement of usability in similar applications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aceros, J.C., Pols, J., Domènech, M.: Where is grandma? Home telecare, good aging and the domestication of later life. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 93, 102–111 (2015)
Al-Temeemy, A.A.: Multispectral imaging: monitoring vulnerable people. Optik 180, 469–483 (2019)
Bangor, A., Kortum, P., Miller, J.: Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J. Usability Stud. 4(3), 114–123 (2009)
Barlow, J., Singh, D., Bayer, S., Curry, R.: A systematic review of the benefits of home telecare for frail elderly people and those with long-term conditions. J. Telemed. Telecare 13(4), 172–179 (2007)
Barriga, A., Conejero, J., Hernández, J., Jurado, E., Moguel, E., Sánchez-Figueroa, F.: A vision-based approach for building telecare and telerehabilitation services. Sensors 16(10), 1724 (2016)
Bjørkquist, C., Forss, M., Samuelsen, F.: Collaborative challenges in the use of telecare. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 33(1), 93–101 (2019)
Brownsell, S., Hawley, M.: Fall detectors: do they work or reduce the fear of falling? Hous. Care Support 7(1), 18–24 (2004)
Cardile, F., Iannizzotto, G., La Rosa, F.: A vision-based system for elderly patients monitoring. In: 3rd International Conference on Human System Interaction, pp. 195–202 (2010)
Chiatti, C., et al.: Final report containing case-by-case detailed description and analysis of selected 12 Good practices. The CARICT project: deliverable 4.3 (2011)
Czekanowski, P., Mnich, E., McKee, K., Öberg, B., Prouskas, C., Quattrini, S.: Main characteristics of the sample: older care-receivers and their main family carers. In: Family Carers of Older People in Europe, pp. 117–143 (2008)
Davey, J.A., de Joux, V., Nana, G., Arcus, M.: Accommodation Options for Older People in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Centre for Housing Research, Christchurch (2004)
Demiris, G., Oliver, D.P., Dickey, G., Skubic, M., Rantz, M.: Findings from a participatory evaluation of a smart home application for older adults. Technol. Health Care 16(2), 111–118 (2008)
Department of Health: Building Telecare in England (2005). https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130124070255/. http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4115644.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2019
Gjoreski, H., Bizjak, J., Gams, M.: Using smartwatch as telecare and fall detection device. In: 12th International Conference on Intelligent Environments, pp. 242–245 (2016)
Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Sugarhood, P., Hinder, S., Procter, R., Stones, R.: What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. Soc. Sci. Med. 93, 86–94 (2013)
Gund, A., Ekman, I., Lindecrantz, K., Sjoqvist, B.A., Staaf, E.L., Thorneskold, N.: Design evaluation of a home-based telecare system for chronic heart failure patients. In: 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 5851–5854 (2008)
Holthe, T., Jentoft, R., Arntzen, C., Thorsen, K.: Benefits and burdens: family caregivers’ experiences of assistive technology (AT) in everyday life with persons with young-onset dementia (YOD). Disabil. Rehabil. Assistive Technol. 13(8), 754–762 (2018)
Jarrold, K., Yeandle, S.: A weight off my mind. Exploring the impact and potential benefits of telecare for unpaid carers in Scotland. Carers Scotland and the University of Leeds, Glasgow, Scotland (2009)
Govind Joshi, S., Woll, A.: A collaborative change experiment: telecare as a means for delivery of home care services. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2014. LNCS, vol. 8519, pp. 141–151. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07635-5_15
Kachouie, R., Sedighadeli, S., Khosla, R., Chu, M.T.: Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a mixed-method systematic literature review. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 30(5), 369–393 (2014)
Karlsen, C., Moe, C.E., Haraldstad, K., Thygesen, E.: Caring by telecare? A hermeneutic study of experiences among older adults and their family caregivers. J. Clin. Nurs. 28(7–8), 1300–1313 (2019)
Kim, J.: A qualitative analysis of user experiences with a self-tracker for activity, sleep, and diet. Interact. J. Med. Res. 3(1), e8 (2014)
Koceska, N., Koceski, S., Zobel, P.B., Trajkovik, V., Garcia, N.: A telemedicine robot system for assisted and independent living. Sensors 19, 834 (2019)
Koch, S., Hägglund, M.: Health informatics and the delivery of care to older people. Maturitas 63(3), 195–199 (2009)
Lindquist, L.A., et al.: Advanced life events (ALEs) that impede aging-in-place among seniors. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 64, 90–95 (2016)
Lynch, J.K., Glasby, J., Robinson, S.: If telecare is the answer, what was the question? Storylines, tensions and the unintended consequences of technology-supported care. Critical Soc. Policy 39(1), 44–65 (2019)
McCreadie, C., Tinker, A.: The acceptability of assistive technology to older people. Ageing Soc. 25(1), 91–110 (2005)
Milligan, C., Roberts, C., Mort, M.: Telecare and older people: who cares where? Soc. Sci. Med. 72(3), 347–354 (2011)
Mortenson, W.B., Demers, L., Fuhrer, M.J., Jutai, J.W., Lenker, J., DeRuyter, F.: Effects of an assistive technology intervention on older adults with disabilities and their informal caregivers. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 92(4), 297–306 (2013)
Núñez-Marcos, A., Azkune, G., Arganda-Carreras, I.: Vision-based fall detection with convolutional neural networks. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2017(1), 1–16 (2017)
Principi, A., et al.: Work restrictions experienced by midlife family caregivers of older people: evidence from six European countries. Ageing Soc. 34(2), 209–231 (2014)
Roth, D.L., Fredman, L., Haley, W.E.: Informal caregiving and its impact on health: a reappraisal from population-based studies. Gerontologist 55(2), 309–319 (2015)
Sarma, S., Simpson, W.: A panel multinomial logit analysis of elderly living arrangements: evidence from aging in Manitoba longitudinal data. Soc. Sci. Med. 65(12), 2539–2552 (2007)
Schulz, R., Wahl, H.W., Matthews, J.T., De Vito Dabbs, A., Beach, S.R., Czaja, S.J.: Advancing the aging and technology agenda in gerontology. Gerontologist 55(5), 724–734 (2014)
Sethi, R., Bagga, G., Carpenter, D., Azzi, D., Khusainov, R.: Telecare: legal, ethical and socioeconomic factors. In: International Conference on Telehealth (2012)
Singh, J., Lutteroth, C., Wünsche, B.C.: Taxonomy of usability requirements for home telehealth systems. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the NZ Chapter of the ACM Special Interest Group on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 29–32 (2010)
Stowe, S., Harding, S.: Telecare, telehealth and telemedicine. Eur. Geriatr. Med. 1(3), 193–197 (2010)
Vines, J., et al.: Making family care work: dependence, privacy and remote home monitoring telecare systems. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 607–616 (2013)
Wherton, J., Sugarhood, P., Procter, R., Hinder, S., Greenhalgh, T.: Co-production in practice: how people with assisted living needs can help design and evolve technologies and services. Implementation Sci. 10(1), 75 (2015)
Wiles, J.L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J., Allen, R.E.: The meaning of “aging in place” to older people. Gerontologist 52(3), 357–366 (2012)
World Health Organization: Global age-friendly cities: A guide. World Health Organization (2007)
Ziefle, M., Himmel, S., Wilkowska, W.: When your living space knows what you do: acceptance of medical home monitoring by different technologies. In: Holzinger, A., Simonic, K.-M. (eds.) USAB 2011. LNCS, vol. 7058, pp. 607–624. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25364-5_43
Acknowledgements
The authors thank everyone involved in the study. This study was part of the Project ICT Solutions for Active and Healthy Aging: Integrating Informal e-Care Services in Slovenia (Slovenian Research Agency, Project No. L5-7626).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Držanič, I.L. et al. (2019). Usability Testing of a Smartphone Telecare Application for Informal Caregivers. In: Milošević, D., Tang, Y., Zu, Q. (eds) Human Centered Computing. HCC 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11956. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37429-7_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37429-7_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37428-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37429-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)