Fine-GRAINed Process Metadata | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Fine-GRAINed Process Metadata

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Metadata and Semantic Research (MTSR 2019)

Abstract

We describe the process metadata of GRAIN, a complex language data corpus, as a show case for application of metadata in the Digital Humanities. While the creation of language resources usually involves some automatic processing ranging from format conversion to labeling of structural features, data selection, inspection and interpretation are important manual steps, which tend to be neglected in the description of scientific workflows. GRAIN makes use of a format which (i) maps all workflow steps to flexible triples of \(\{input,operator,output\}\) and (ii) treats manual and automatic steps equally. Moreover, the process metadata has been semi-automatically generated and allows for a straightforward visualization describing the creation of the resource.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cf. [2] for the impact of a minor decision in the data creation process on several downstream tasks.

  2. 2.

    http://dublincore.org/.

  3. 3.

    https://www.clarin.eu/content/component-metadata.

  4. 4.

    https://kepler-project.org/.

  5. 5.

    https://galaxyproject.org/.

  6. 6.

    https://github.com/korpling/LAUDATIO-Metadata/.

  7. 7.

    The definition of ‘word’ is highly discussed among linguists, this contribution thus opts for a colloquial understanding of the term.

  8. 8.

    About 140 interviews of 9–10 minutes each with up to 24 annotation layers.

  9. 9.

    http://www.json.org/.

  10. 10.

    The manual syntactic annotation is not in the GRAIN release, but work in progress.

  11. 11.

    In the creation of GRAIN, git (https://git-scm.com/) was applied.

  12. 12.

    About 6350 JSON structures with process metadata for the automatic part.

  13. 13.

    https://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/1021841, https://d3js.org.

  14. 14.

    https://neo4j.com/.

  15. 15.

    https://github.com/RePlay-DH/replay-dh-client.

  16. 16.

    https://gradle.org/.

References

  1. Eckart, K., Gärtner, M., Kuhn, J., Schweitzer, K.: Nützlich und nutzbar für die linguistische Forschung: Sprachtechnologische Infrastruktur. In: Lobin, H., Schneider, R., Witt, A. (eds.) Digitale Infrastrukturen für die germanistische Forschung, chap. 6, pp. 115–148. de Gruyter, Berlin/Boston (2018). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110538663-007

  2. Elming, J., Johannsen, A., Klerke, S., Lapponi, E., Martinez Alonso, H., Søgaard, A.: Down-stream effects of tree-to-dependency conversions. In: Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2013, pp. 617–626. Association for Computational Linguistics, Atlanta, Georgia (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gärtner, M., Hahn, U., Hermann, S.: Supporting sustainable process documentation. In: Rehm, G., Declerck, T. (eds.) GSCL 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10713, pp. 284–291. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73706-5_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Jung, K., Gärtner, M.: Approaches to sustainable process metadata. In: Simov, K., Eskevich, M. (eds.) Proceedings of CLARIN Annual Conference 2019, Leipzig, Germany (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lemnitzer, L., Zinsmeister, H.: Korpuslinguistik. Narr Francke Attempo, Tübingen (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Riester, A., Baumann, S.: The RefLex Scheme - Annotation Guidelines, SinSpeC. Working Papers of the SFB 732, vol. 14, University of Stuttgart (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-9011

  7. Schweitzer, K., et al.: German radio interviews: the grain release of the SFB732 silver standard collection. In: Calzolari, N., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of LREC 2018. Miyazaki, Japan (2018). ISBN 979-10-95546-00-9

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerstin Jung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jung, K., Gärtner, M., Kuhn, J. (2019). Fine-GRAINed Process Metadata. In: Garoufallou, E., Fallucchi, F., William De Luca, E. (eds) Metadata and Semantic Research. MTSR 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1057. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36599-8_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36599-8_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36598-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36599-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics