Does the Migration of Cross-Platform Apps Towards the Android Platform Matter? An Approach and a User Study | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Does the Migration of Cross-Platform Apps Towards the Android Platform Matter? An Approach and a User Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 11915))

  • 3776 Accesses

Abstract

We present an approach to migrate cross-platform apps toward a native platform (i.e., Android). The approach is tailored to Ionic, i.e., an open-source framework providing a mobile UI (User Interface) toolkit for developing high-quality cross-platform apps. The validity of our approach has been validated on an open-source app developed by means of Ionic (i.e., Movies-app). In such a way, we had two versions of the same app: one developed in Ionic (the original one) and the other in Android (the migrated one). To investigate if there is a difference in the user experience when using these two versions, we conducted a user study. This user study also aimed at assessing the presence of possible differences in the affective reactions of users when using these two versions of Movies-app. The results suggest that the user experience is better when users deal with the migrated app. Similar results were achieved with respect to the affective reactions of users. We can then conclude that the migration from Ionic towards Android matters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34986098/migrating-from-hybrid-app-to-native-app-at-later-point-of-time.

  2. 2.

    https://github.com/okode/movies-app.

  3. 3.

    Affect is a concept used in psychology to describe the experience of feeling or emotion.

  4. 4.

    In the ISO 9241-210 [10], the user experience is defined as “a person’s perceptions and responses that result from the use or anticipated use of a product, system or service.”

  5. 5.

    https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/ui/layout/recyclerview.

  6. 6.

    https://www.ueq-online.org.

  7. 7.

    Umidigi A3, a Dual-Sim smartphone equipped with Android 8.1.0, 5.5” screen with 720 \(\times \) 1440 resolution points, 3300mAh capacity battery, 2 GB RAM, 16 GB of expandable memory, MediaTek MT6739 processor.

  8. 8.

    We used this kind of effect size because it is conceived to be used with ordinal variables [13]. It is: negligible if \(|\delta |<\) 0.147, small if \(0.147\le |\delta |<\) 0.33, medium if \(0.33\le |\delta |<\) 0.474, or large if \(|\delta |\ge \) 0.474 [19].

References

  1. Android Developers: Guide to app architecture. https://developer.android.com/jetpack/docs/guide

  2. Android Styles and Themes. https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/ui/look-and-feel/themes

  3. Angular. https://angular.io

  4. Bradley, M.M., Lang, P.J.: Measuring emotion. The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 25(1), 49–59 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brodie, M.L., Stonebraker, M.: Legacy Information Systems Migration: Gateways, Interfaces, and the Incremental Approach. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brunner, E., Dette, H., Munk, A.: Box-type approximations in non parametric factorial designs. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 92, 1494–1502 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Lucia, A., Francese, R., Scanniello, G., Tortora, G.: Developing legacy system migration methods and tools for technology transfer Software. Pract. Exp. 38(13), 1333–1364 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Francese, R., Gravino, C., Risi, M., Scanniello, G., Tortora, G.: Mobile app development and management: results from a qualitative investigation. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems, pp. 133–143. IEEE Press (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hossain, T.: Android Application Architecture. https://medium.com/oceanize-geeks/android-application-architecture-189b4721c7c5

  10. International Organization for Standardization: Ergonomics of human system interaction - Part 210: Human-centered design for interactive systems (formerly known as 13407). ISO FDIS 9241–210 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jedlitschka, A., Ciolkowski, M., Pfahl, D.: Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering. Springer, London (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-044-5. Ch. Reporting Experiments in Software Engineering

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaptein, M.C., Nass, C., Markopoulos, P.: Powerful and consistent analysis of likert-type rating scales. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2391–2394. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cliff, N.: Ordinal Methods for Behavioral Data Analysis. Erlbaum, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. King, N.: Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In: Cassell, C., Symon, G. (eds.) Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, pp. 256–270. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Klima, P., Selinger, S.: Towards platform independence of mobile applications. In: Moreno-Díaz, R., Pichler, F., Quesada-Arencibia, A. (eds.) EUROCAST 2013. LNCS, vol. 8112, pp. 442–449. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53862-9_56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Koelstra, S., et al.: Deap: a database for emotion analysis using physiological signals. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 3(1), 18–31 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Laugwitz, B., Held, T., Schrepp, M.: Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. In: Holzinger, A. (ed.) USAB 2008. LNCS, vol. 5298, pp. 63–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89350-9_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. McKenzie, C.: What Java developers need to know about TypeScript syntax. https://www.theserverside.com/tutorial/What-Java-developers-need-to-know-about-TypeScript-syntax

  19. Romano, J., Kromrey, J., Coraggio, J., Skowronek, J.: Appropriate statistics for ordinal level data: should we really be using t-test and Cohens d for evaluating group differences on the NSSE and other surveys? In: Annual Meeting of the Florida Association of Institutional Research, pp. 1–3 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stehle, T., Riebisch, M.: A porting method for coordinated multiplatform evolution. J. Softw. Evol. Process 31(2), e2116 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vegas, S., Apa, C., Juristo, N.: Crossover designs in software engineering experiments: benefits and perils. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 42(2), 120–135 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Juristo, N., Moreno, A.: Basics of Software Engineering Experimentation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Tellegen, A.: Development and validation of brief measures ofpositive and negative affect: the panas scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54(6), 1063–1070 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Host, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., Wessln, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, Heidelberg (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy

    Maria Caulo & Giuseppe Scanniello

  2. University of Salerno, Fisciano, SA, Italy

    Rita Francese & Antonio Spera

Authors
  1. Maria Caulo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rita Francese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Giuseppe Scanniello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Antonio Spera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rita Francese .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain

    Xavier Franch

  2. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

    Tomi Männistö

  3. Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering, Kaiserslautern, Germany

    Silverio Martínez-Fernández

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Caulo, M., Francese, R., Scanniello, G., Spera, A. (2019). Does the Migration of Cross-Platform Apps Towards the Android Platform Matter? An Approach and a User Study. In: Franch, X., Männistö, T., Martínez-Fernández, S. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11915. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35333-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35333-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35332-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35333-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics