Analysis of Blockchain Selfish Mining Attacks | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1050))

Abstract

The paper presents vector of attack on the mechanism of achieving a proof of work consensus, such as the application of selfish mining strategy. The aim of the work was to analyze to what extent these risks may affect the fairness of the cryptocurrency extraction process. This goal was achieved by performing simulations using appropriate models. The aim of the experiment was to check how the choice of parameters affects the distribution of block extraction between network users. We use an algorithm of persistent mining in the pursuit of a longer chain with a modified selfish extraction algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 17159
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 21449
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eyal, I., Sirer, E.G.: Majority is not enough: Bitcoin mining is vulnerable. Commun. ACM 61(7), 95–102 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H.N., Wang, H.: Blockchain challenges and opportunities: a survey. Work Pap.–2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kozlowski, P., Kedziora, M., Marianski, A., Jozwiak, I.: Implementation of Research on the Feasibility of a Sybil Attacks in Blockchain Networks, ICSAI 2019 – in review (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bitcoin Cash. Bitcoin Cash. https://www.bitcoincash.org/

  5. Nayak, K., et al.: Stubborn mining: generalizing selfish mining and combining with an eclipse attack. In: 2016 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS P), pp. 305–320 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/eurosp.2016.32

  6. Sapirshtein, A., Sompolinsky, Y., Zohar, A.: Optimal selfish mining strategies in Bitcoin. CoRR abs/1507.06183 (2015). arXiv:1507.06183

  7. Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system (2008). http://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

  8. Fischer, M.J., Lynch, N.A., Paterson, M.S.: Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process. J. ACM 32(2), 374–382 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1145/3149.214121. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3149.214121, ISSN 0004-5411

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Lamport, L., Shostak, R., Pease, M.: The Byzantine generals problem. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 4(3), 382–401 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1145/357172.357176. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/357172.357176, ISSN: 0164-0925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, W., et al.: Securing proof-of-stake blockchain protocols. In: Garcia-Alfaro, J., et al. (eds.) Data Privacy Management, Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Technology, pp. 297–315. Springer, Cham (2017). ISBN: 978-3-319-67816-0

    Google Scholar 

  11. Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J.A., Murray, R.M.: Consensus and cooperation in networked multi-agent systems. Proc. IEEE 95(1), 215–233 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2006.887293, ISSN: 0018-9219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Quesnelle, J.: On the linkability of Zcash transactions. In: CoRR abs/1712.01210 (2017). arXiv:1712.01210

  13. Zheng, Z., et al.: Blockchain challenges and opportunities: a survey, December 2017

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fanti, G., Viswanath, P.: Deanonymization in the Bitcoin P2P network. In: Guyon, I., et al. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, pp. 1364–1373. Curran Associates, Inc. (2017). http://papersnips.cc/paper/6735-deanonymization-in-the-bitcoin-p2p-network.pdf

  15. Reid, F., Harrigan, M.: An analysis of anonymity in the Bitcoin system. ArXiv e-prints, July 2011. arXiv:1107.4524 [physics.soc-ph]

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michal Kędziora .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kędziora, M., Kozłowski, P., Szczepanik, M., Jóźwiak, P. (2020). Analysis of Blockchain Selfish Mining Attacks. In: Borzemski, L., Świątek, J., Wilimowska, Z. (eds) Information Systems Architecture and Technology: Proceedings of 40th Anniversary International Conference on Information Systems Architecture and Technology – ISAT 2019. ISAT 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1050. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30440-9_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics