Triggering Ontology Alignment Revalidation Based on the Degree of Change Significance on the Ontology Concept Level | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Triggering Ontology Alignment Revalidation Based on the Degree of Change Significance on the Ontology Concept Level

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Information Systems (BIS 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 353))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Following a common definition, ontologies can be seen as a formal specification of a conceptualisation. However, it cannot be expected that there will be no changes applied to them. Obviously, any application build on top of some ontology needs to adjust to the introduced alterations. For example, a mapping designated between two ontologies (also called an ontology alignment) is valid only if participating ontologies are fixed. In this paper we present a function that can indicate, whether or not, the aforementioned alignment needs updating, in order to follow modifications done to participating ontologies, and to avoid mapping them again from scratch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 9380
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 11725
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Achichi, M., et al.: Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2017. In: OM 2017–12th ISWC Workshop on Ontology Matching, pp. 61–113 (2017). No commercial editor

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allocca, C., d’Aquin, M., Motta, E.: Detecting different versions of ontologies in large ontology repositories. In: Proceedings of IWOD 2009, Washington, D.C., USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dinh, D., Dos Reis, J.C., Pruski, C., Da Silveira, M., Reynaud-Delaître, C.: Identifying relevant concept attributes to support mapping maintenance under ontology evolution. Web Semant.: Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 29, 53–66 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Euzenat, J.: Revision in networks of ontologies. Artif. Intell. 228, 195–216 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Grandi, F.: Multi-temporal RDF ontology versioning. In: Proceedings of IWOD 2009, Washington, D.C., USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hartung, M., Groß, A., Rahm, E.: COnto-Diff: generation of complex evolution mappings for life science ontologies. J. Biomed. Inform. 46(1), 15–32 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heflin, J., Pan, Z.: A model theoretic semantics for ontology versioning. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 62–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30475-3_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Klein, M., Fensel, D., Kiryakov, A., Ognyanov, D.: Ontology versioning and change detection on the web. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 197–212. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45810-7_20

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Khattak, A.M., Latif, K., Lee, S.: Change management in evolving web ontologies. Knowl.-Based Syst. 37, 1–18 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kondylakis, H., Plexousakis, D.: Ontology evolution without tears. J. Web Semant. 19, 42–58 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kozierkiewicz, A., Pietranik, M.: The knowledge increase estimation framework for integration of ontology instances’ relations. In: Lupeikiene, A., Vasilecas, O., Dzemyda, G. (eds.) DB&IS 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 838, pp. 172–186. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97571-9_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiménez-Ruiz, E., Cuenca Grau, B.: LogMap: logic-based and scalable ontology matching. In: Aroyo, L., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2011. LNCS, vol. 7031, pp. 273–288. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25073-6_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Papavassiliou, V., Flouris, G., Fundulaki, I., Kotzinos, D., Christophides, V.: High-level change detection in RDF(S) KBs. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 38(1), 1–42 (2013)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Pietranik, M., Nguyen, N.T.: A Multi-atrribute based framework for ontology aligning. Neurocomputing 146, 276–290 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2014.03.067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pietranik, M., Nguyen, N.T.: Framework for ontology evolution based on a multi-attribute alignment method. In: CYBCONF 2015, pp. 108–112 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/CYBConf.2015.7175915

  16. Sassi, N., Jaziri, W., Gargouri, F.: Z-based formalization of kits of changes to maintain ontology consistency. In: Proceedings of KEOD 2009, pp. 388–391 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zablith, F., et al.: Ontology evolution: a process-centric survey. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 30(1), 45–75 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zekri, A., Brahmia, Z., Grandi, F., Bouaziz, R.: \(\tau \)OWL: a systematic approach to temporal versioning of semantic web ontologies. J. Data Semant. 5(3), 141–163 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research project was supported by grant No. 2017/26/D/ST6/00251 from the National Science Centre, Poland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Computer Science and Management, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27, 50-370, Wroclaw, Poland

    Adrianna Kozierkiewicz & Marcin Pietranik

Authors
  1. Adrianna Kozierkiewicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcin Pietranik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcin Pietranik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poznań, Poland

    Witold Abramowicz

  2. ETSI Informática, University of Seville, Seville, Spain

    Rafael Corchuelo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kozierkiewicz, A., Pietranik, M. (2019). Triggering Ontology Alignment Revalidation Based on the Degree of Change Significance on the Ontology Concept Level. In: Abramowicz, W., Corchuelo, R. (eds) Business Information Systems. BIS 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 353. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20485-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20485-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20484-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20485-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics