A Mathematical Model for Enhancer Activation Kinetics During Cell Differentiation | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

A Mathematical Model for Enhancer Activation Kinetics During Cell Differentiation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithms for Computational Biology (AlCoB 2019)

Abstract

Cell differentiation and development are for a great part steered by cell type specific enhancers. Transcription factor (TF) binding to an enhancer together with DNA looping result in transcription initiation. In addition to binding motifs for TFs, enhancer regions typically contain specific histone modifications. This information has been used to detect enhancer regions and classify them into different subgroups. However, it is poorly understood how TF binding and histone modifications are causally connected and what kind of molecular dynamics steer the activation process.

Contrary to previous studies, we do not treat the activation events as static epigenetic marks but consider the enhancer activation as a dynamic process. We develop a mathematical model to describe the dynamic mechanisms between TF binding and histone modifications known to characterize an active enhancer. We estimate model parameters from time-course data and infer the causal relationships between TF binding and different histone modifications. We benchmark the performance of this framework using simulated data and survey the ability of our method to identify the correct model structures for a variety of system dynamics, noise levels and the number of measurement time points.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 6634
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 8293
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bishop, C.M.: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Information Science and Statistics. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Calo, E., Wysocka, J.: Modification of enhancer chromatin: what, how, and why? Mol. Cell 49(5), 825–837 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Creyghton, M.P., et al.: Histone H3K27AC separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 107(50), 21931–21936 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Friel, N., Wyse, J.: Estimating the evidence-a review. Stat. Neerl. 66(3), 288–308 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Fröhlich, F., Kaltenbacher, B., Theis, F.J., Hasenauer, J.: Scalable parameter estimation for genome-scale biochemical reaction networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13(1), e1005331 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gelman, A., et al.: Bayesian Data Analysis, vol. 2, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghavi-Helm, Y., et al.: Enhancer loops appear stable during development and are associated with paused polymerase. Nature 512(7512), 96–100 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Girolami, M.: Bayesian inference for differential equations. Theor. Comput. Sci. 408(1), 4–16 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Hayashi, Y., et al.: Theoretical framework for the histone modification network: modifications in the unstructured histone tails form a robust scale-free network. Genes Cells 14(7), 789–806 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heintzman, N.D., et al.: Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 39(3), 311–318 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kreutz, C., Raue, A., Kaschek, D., Timmer, J.: Profile likelihood in systems biology. FEBS J. 280(11), 2564–2571 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lasserre, J., et al.: Finding associations among histone modifications using sparse partial correlation networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9(9), e1003168 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Le, N.T., Ho, T.B.: Reconstruction of histone modification network from next-generation sequencing data. In: 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE), pp. 181–188. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meeker, W.Q., Escobar, L.A.: Teaching about approximate confidence regions based on maximum likelihood estimation. Am. Stat. 49(1), 48–53 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Natoli, G.: Maintaining cell identity through global control of genomic organization. Immunity 33(1), 12–24 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Oki, S., Otsuki, N., Kohsaka, T., Azuma, M.: Stat6 activation and Th2 cell proliferation driven by CD28 signals. Eur. J. Immunol. 30(5), 1416–1424 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Perner, J., et al.: Inference of interactions between chromatin modifiers and histone modifications: from chip-seq data to chromatin-signaling. Nucleic Acids Res. 42(22), 13689–13695 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Raue, A., et al.: Lessons learned from quantitative dynamical modeling in systems biology. PloS One 8(9), e74335 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Raue, A., et al.: Data2Dynamics: a modeling environment tailored to parameter estimation in dynamical systems. Bioinformatics 31(21), 3558–3560 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schwarz, G.: Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 6(2), 461–464 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Stapor, P., et al.: PESTO: parameter estimation toolbox. Bioinformatics 34(4), 705–707 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vahedi, G., et al.: Stats shape the active enhancer landscape of T cell populations. Cell 151(5), 981–993 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Voss, T.C., Hager, G.L.: Dynamic regulation of transcriptional states by chromatin and transcription factors. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15(2), 69–81 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu, H., et al.: Inferring causal relationships among different histone modifications and gene expression. Genome Res. 18(8), 1314–1324 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou, J., Troyanskaya, O.G.: Global quantitative modeling of chromatin factor interactions. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003525 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the computational resources provided by Aalto Science-IT project.

Funding

This work has been supported by the Academy of Finland, project 275537 and Chan Zuckerberg Initiative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kari Nousiainen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table 2. The simulated models and the means of the parameters used in data simulations. One representative from each model family were selected for generating data. Index \(k \in \{0,1,7,11 \}\) specifies the model structure as described in Table 1. A sampled parameter vector \(\varvec{\theta }_k\) consists of kinetic parameters \(\theta _{kl}\), initial values for three ordered enhancer activation signals denoted by \(x_0\), \(y_0\) and \(z_0\) and the simulation specific measurement noise \(\sigma _s\) which was 0.15, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25 1.5 or 2.0. Independent, cascade and synergistic models have six kinetic parameters. Consecutive odd and even elements are the activation rates and the corresponding deactivation rates of the enhancer activation signal, respectively. Additive models have seven kinetic parameters. First four of them are the basal activation and the deactivation rates of enhancer activity signal x and y mediating dynamics independent from other variables while \(\theta _{k5}\) and \(\theta _{k6}\) are the activation rates of z activation caused by x and y and \(\theta _{k7}\) is the deactivation rate of z.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nousiainen, K., Intosalmi, J., Lähdesmäki, H. (2019). A Mathematical Model for Enhancer Activation Kinetics During Cell Differentiation. In: Holmes, I., Martín-Vide, C., Vega-Rodríguez, M. (eds) Algorithms for Computational Biology. AlCoB 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11488. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18174-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18174-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18173-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18174-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics