Introducing Intelligence and Autonomy into Industrial Robots to Address Operations into Dangerous Area | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Introducing Intelligence and Autonomy into Industrial Robots to Address Operations into Dangerous Area

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Modelling and Simulation for Autonomous Systems (MESAS 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11472))

Abstract

The paper addresses the issue to use new generation robotic systems inside industrial facilities in order to complete operations in dangerous area. The new robotic systems are currently adopting the autonomous approach already in use in military sector; however, in this context the intensity of operations and the necessity to interact with high productivity systems introduce different challenges. Despite the problems, it is evident that this approach could provide very interesting improvements in terms of safety for humans especially in relations to dangerous area. For instance, in confined spaces, Oil & Gas or Hot Metal Industry these new autonomous systems could reduce the number of injures and casualties. In addition, these systems could increase the operation efficiency in this complex frameworks as well as the possibility to carry out inspections systematically; in this sense, this could result in improving the overall reliability, productivity and safety of the whole Industrial Plant. Therefore, it is important to consider that these systems could be used to address also security aspects such as access control, however they could result vulnerable to new threats such as the cyber ones and need to be properly designed in terms of single entities, algorithms, infrastructure and architecture. From this point of view, it is evident that Modeling and Simulation represent the main approach to design properly these new systems. In this paper, the authors present the use of autonomous systems introducing advanced capabilities supported by Artificial Intelligence to deal with complex operations in dangerous industrial frameworks. The proposed examples in oil and gas and hot metal industry confirm the potential of these systems and demonstrate as simulation supports their introduction in terms of engineering, testing, installation, ramp up and training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altawy, R., Youssef, A.M.: Security, privacy, and safety aspects of civilian drones: a survey. ACM Trans. Cyber-Phys. Syst. 1(2), 7 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Apvrille, L., Roudier, Y., Tanzi, T.J.: Autonomous drones for disasters management: safety and security verifications. In: Proceedings of 1st IEEE URSI Atlantic, May 2015

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bass, T.: Intrusion detection systems and multisensor data fusion. Commun. ACM 43(4), 99–105 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruzzone, A.G., et al.: Autonomous systems & safety issues: the roadmap to enable new advances in industrial applications. In: Proceedings of I3 M, Barcellona, Spain, September 2017

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bruzzone, A.G.: Information security: threats and opportunities in a safegurading perspective. Lectio Magistralis as Keynote Speech at World Engineering Forum, Rome, November 2017

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bruzzone, A., et al.: Disasters and emergency management in chemical and industrial plants: drones simulation for education and training. In: Hodicky, J. (ed.) MESAS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9991, pp. 301–308. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47605-6_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Bruzzone, A.G., et al.: Simulation models for hybrid warfare and population simulation. In: Proceedings of NATO Symposium on Ready for the Predictable, Prepared for the Unexpected, M&S for Collective Defence in Hybrid Environments and Hybrid Conflicts, Bucharest, Romania, 17–21 October 2016

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bruzzone, A.G., Massei, M., Maglione, G.L., Di Matteo, R., Franzinetti, G.: Simulation of manned & autonomous systems for critical infrastructure protection. In: Proceedings of I3 M, Larnaca, Cyprus, September 2016

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bruzzone, A.G., Massei, M., Agresta, M., Poggi, S., Camponeschi, F., Camponesch, M.: Addressing strategic challenges on mega cities through MS2G. In: Proceedings of MAS, Bordeaux, France, 12–14 September (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bruzzone, A.G., et al.: Virtual framework for testing/experiencing potential of collaborative autonomous systems. In: Proceedings of I/ITSEC, Orlando, FL, USA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bürkle, A., Segor, F., Kollmann, M.: Towards autonomous micro uav swarms. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 61(1–4), 339–353 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cárdenas, A.A., Amin, S., Lin, Z.S., Huang, Y.L., Huang, C.Y., Sastry, S.: Attacks against process control systems: risk assessment, detection, and response. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security, March, pp. 355–366 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Clarke, R., Moses, L.B.: The regulation of civilian drones’ impacts on public safety. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 30(3), 263–285 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Di Donato, L.: Intelligent systems for safety of industrial operators, the role of machines & equipment laboratories. In: SISOM Workshop, Rome (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Djellal, F., Gallouj, F.: Services and the search for relevant innovation indicators: a review of national and international surveys. Sci. Public Policy 26(4), 218–232 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Doherty, P., Rudol, P.: A UAV search and rescue scenario with human body detection and geolocalization. In: Orgun, M.A., Thornton, J. (eds.) AI 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4830, pp. 1–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76928-6_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Feddema, J.T., Lewis, C., Schoenwald, D.A.: Decentralized control of cooperative robotic vehicles: theory and application. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 18(5), 852–864 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferrandez, J.M., De Lope, H., De la Paz, F.: Social and collaborative robotics. Int. J. Robot. Auton. Syst. 61 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Floreano, D., Wood, R.J.: Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones. Nature 521(7553), 460 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gardi, A., Sabatini, R., Ramasamy, S.: Stand-off measurement of industrial air pollutant emissions from unmanned aircraft. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems, June, pp. 1162–1171 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Grocholsky, B., Keller, J., Kumar, V., Pappas, G.: Cooperative air and ground surveillance. Robot. Autom. Mag. 13(3), 16–25 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ishiki, T., Kumon, M.: A microphone array configuration for an auditory quadrotor helicopter system. In: Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics, pp. 1–6 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jans, W., Nissen, I., Gerdes, F., Sangfelt, E., Solberg, C.E., van Walree, P.: UUV covert acoustic communications – preliminary results of the first sea experiment. In: Techniques and technologies for unmanned autonomous underwater vehicles – a dual use view, RTO Workshop SCI-182/RWS-016, Eckernförde, Germany (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jones, D.: Power line inspection-a UAV concept. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Forum on Autonomous Systems, Ref. No. 11271, November 2005

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kastek, M., et al.: Multisensor system for the protection of critical infrastructure of seaport. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 8288, May 2012

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kehoe, B., Patil, S., Abbeel, P., Goldberg, K.: A survey of research on cloud robotics and automation. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 12(2), 398–409 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim, D.H., Kwon, S.W., Jung, S.W., Park, S., Park, J.W., Seo, J.W.: A study on generation of 3D model and mesh image of excavation work using UAV. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Vilnius, vol. 32, January 2015

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kovacevic, M.S., Gavin, K., Oslakovic, I.S., Bacic, M.: A new methodology for assessment of railway infrastructure condition. Transp. Res. Procedia 14, 1930–1939 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Leão, D.T., Santos, M.B.G., Mello, M.C.A., Morais, S.F.A.: Consideration of occupational risks in construction confined spaces in a brewery. In: Occupational Safety & Hygiene III, vol. 343 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Magrassi, C.: Education and training: delivering cost effective readiness for tomorrow’s operations. ITEC Keynote Speech, Rome, May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  31. Maravall, D., de Lope, J., Domíngueza, R.: Coordination of communication in robot teams by reinforcement learning. Robot. Auton. Syst. 61, 661–666 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. McCurry, J.: Dying robots and failing hope: fukushima clean-up falters six years after Tsunami. The Guardian, 9 March 2017

    Google Scholar 

  33. Merabti, M., Kennedy, M., Hurst, W.: Critical infrastructure protection: A 21 st century challenge. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications and Information Technology, ICCIT, March, pp. 1–6 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Merwaday, A., Guvenc, I.: UAV assisted heterogeneous networks for public safety communications. In: Proceedings of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops, March, pp. 329–334 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mobley, R.K.: Plant Engineer’s Handbook. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nano, G., Derudi, M.: A critical analysis of techniques for the reconstruction of workers accidents. Chem. Eng. 31 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Palazzi, E., Caviglione, C., Reverberi, A.P., Fabiano, B.: A short-cut analytical model of hydrocarbon pool fire of different geometries, with enhanced view factor evaluation. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 110, 89–101 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pizzella, L.A.E.: Contributions to the Configuration of Fleets of Robots for Precision Agriculture. Thesis, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain, May 2014

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pulina, G., Canalis, C., Manni, C., Casula, A., Carta, L.A., Camarda, I.: Using a GIS technology to plan an agroforestry sustainable system in Sardinia. J. Agric. Eng. 47(s1), 23 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Richards, A., Bellingham, J., Tillerson, M., How, J.: Co-ordination and control of multiple UAVs. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Monterey, CA, August 2002

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ross, S., Jacques, D., Pachter, M., Raquet, J.: A close formation flight test for automated air refueling. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS-2006, Fort Worth, TX, September 2006

    Google Scholar 

  42. Salvini, P.: Urban robotics: towards responsible innovations for our cities. Robot. Auton. Syst. 100, 278–286 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sanchez-Lopez, J.L., Pestana, J., de la Puente, P., Campoy, P.: A reliable open-source system architecture for the fast designing and prototyping of autonomous multi-uav systems: Simulation and experimentation. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 84(1–4), 779–797 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Shafer, A.J., Benjamin, M.R., Leonard, J.J., Curcio, J.: Autonomous cooperation of heterogeneous platforms for sea-based search tasks. Oceans, 15–18 September, pp. 1–10 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Shkurti, F., et al.: Multi-domain monitoring of marine environments using a heterogeneous robot team. In: Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 1747–1753, 7–12 October 2012

    Google Scholar 

  46. Siebert, S., Teizer, J.: Mobile 3D mapping for surveying earthwork projects using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) system. Autom. Constr. 41, 1–14 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Spanu, S., et al.: Feasibility study of an Augmented Reality application to enhance the operators’ safety in the usage of a fruit extractor. In: Proceedings of FoodOPS, Larnaca, Cyprus, 26–28 September 2016

    Google Scholar 

  48. Spillane, J.P., Oyedele, L.O., Von Meding, J.: Confined site construction: an empirical analysis of factors impacting health and safety management. J. Eng. Des. Technol. 10(3), 397–420 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Stilwell, D.J., Gadre, A.S., Sylvester, C.A., Cannell, C.J.: Design elements of a small low-cost autonomous underwater vehicle for field experiments in multi-vehicle coordination. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles, June, pp. 1–6 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sujit, P.B., Sousa, J., Pereira, F.L.: UAV and AUVs coordination for ocean exploration. In: Oceans - EUROPE, 11–14 May, pp. 1–7 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Tanner, H.G.: Switched UAV-UGV cooperation scheme for target detection. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Roma, Italy, April, pp. 3457–3462 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Tanner, H.G., Christodoulakis, D.K.: Decentralized cooperative control of heterogeneous vehicle groups. Robot. Auton. Syst. 55, 811–823 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Tether, T.: Darpa Strategic Plan. Technical Report DARPA, May 2009

    Google Scholar 

  54. Vail, D., Veloso, M.: Dynamic multi-robot coordination. In: Multi-Robot Systems: From Swarms to Intelligent Automata, vol. II, pp. 87–100 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Valavanis, K.P., Vachtsevanos, G.J.: Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Springer, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9707-1

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agostino G. Bruzzone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bruzzone, A.G., Massei, M., Di Matteo, R., Kutej, L. (2019). Introducing Intelligence and Autonomy into Industrial Robots to Address Operations into Dangerous Area. In: Mazal, J. (eds) Modelling and Simulation for Autonomous Systems. MESAS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11472. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14984-0_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14984-0_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14983-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14984-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics