The Learning Registry: Applying Social Metadata for Learning Resource Recommendations | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

The Learning Registry: Applying Social Metadata for Learning Resource Recommendations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Recommender Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning
  • 1413 Accesses

Abstract

The proliferation of online teaching, learning, and assessment resources is hampering efforts to make finding relevant resources easy. Metadata, while valuable for curating digital collections, is difficult to keep current or, in some cases, to obtain in the first place. Social metadata, paradata, usage data, and contextualized attention metadata all refer to data about doing with digital resources that can be harnessed for recommendations. To centralize this data for aggregation and amplification, the Learning Registry, a store and forward, distributed, de-centralized network of nodes was created. The Learning Registry makes it possible for disparate sources to publish learning resource social/attention metadata—data about users of and activity around resources. We describe our experimentation with social metadata, including that which describes alignment of learning resources to U.S. teaching standards, as a means to generate relationships among resources and people, and how it can be used for recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 11439
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 14299
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
JPY 14299
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen IE, Seaman J (2011) Going the distance: online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group http://www.babson.edu/Academics/centers/blank-center/global-research/Documents/going-the-distance.pdf

  2. Allen IE, Seaman J (2012) Growing the curriculum: open education resources in U.S. higher education. Babson Survey Research Group http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/growingthecurriculum.pdf

  3. Anderson C (2006) The long tail: why the future of business is selling less of more. Hyperion, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bienkowski M, Klo J (2011) Identity in the federal learning registry. Position Paper for W3C Workshop on Identity in the Browser (Mountain View, CA, USA, May 24–25, 2011). http://www.w3.org/2011/identity-ws/papers/idbrowser2011_submission_27.pdf

  5. Bienkowski M, Brecht J, Klo J (2012) The learning registry: building a foundation for learning resource analytics. Learning Analytics and Knowledge 2012 (LAK'12): 29 April–2 May 2012, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bienkowski M, Feng M, Means B (2012) Enhancing teaching and learning through educational data mining and learning analytics: an issue brief. U.S. Department of Education Report

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chang LK, Liu K-Y, Wu C-A, Chen H-Y (2005) Sharing web-based multimedia learning objects using NNTP news architecture. Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT’05)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dean J, Ghemawat S (2008) MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. Commun ACM 51(1):107–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jesukiewicz P, Rehak D (2011) The learning registry: sharing federal learning resources. Presented at the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kyriacou D (2008) A scrutable user modelling infrastructure for enabling life-long user modelling. In: Adaptive hypermedia and adaptive Web-based systems, Springer, Heidelberg, pp 421–425

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee A, Hobson J, Bienkowski M, Midgley S, Currier S, Campbell L, Novoseova T (2012) Towards networked knowledge: the learning registry, an infrastructure for sharing online learning resources. Educ Technol 52(6):14–19

    Google Scholar 

  12. Manouselis N, Drachsler H, Vuorikari R, Hummel H, Koper R (2011) Recommender systems in technology enhanced learning. In: Ricci F, Rokach L, Shapira B, Kantor PB (eds) Recommender systems handbook. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, Boston, MA, pp 387–415. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Manouselis N, Drachsler H, Verbert K, Duval E (2013) Recommender systems for learning. Springer, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Manouselis N, Drachsler H, Verbert K, Santos OC (eds) (2012) Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on recommender systems for technology enhanced learning (RecSysTEL-2012). Saarbrücken, Germany. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-896/. Accessed 18–19 Sept 2012

  15. Manouselis N, Drachsler H, Verbert K, Santos OC (eds) (2010) Proceedings of the 1st workshop on recommender systems for technology enhanced learning (RecSysTEL-2010). Procedia Computer Sci 1(2):2773–2998. Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  16. Niemann K, Scheffel M, Wolpers M (2012) An overview of usage data formats for recommendations in TEL. In: Manouselis N, Drachsler H, Verbert K, Santos OC (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on recommender systems for technology enhanced learning (RecSysTEL-2012). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-896/. p 95

  17. NSDL (2007) NSDL_DC metadata guidelines, http://nsdl.org/contribute/metadata-guide

  18. NSDL (2012) Paradata. http://nsdlnetwork.org/stemexchange/paradata

  19. OAI-PMH (2008) The open archives initiative protocol for metadata harvesting, V2.0, www.openarchives.org/OAI/openarchivesprotocol.html

  20. OCLC (2009) OpenURL. http://www.oclc.org/research/activities/openurl.html

  21. OCLC (2012) Sharing and aggregating social metadata. http://www.oclc.org/research/activities/aggregating.html

  22. Severance C, Teasley SD (2010) Preparing for the long tail of teaching and learning tools. Presented at the proceedings of the 9th international conference of the learning sciences-volume 1, International Society of the Learning Sciences, pp 758–764

    Google Scholar 

  23. Smith J, Klein M, Nelson M (2006) Repository replication using NNTP and SMTP. In: Gonzalo J et al (eds) Research and advanced technology for digital libraries. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 51–62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith MS (2009) Opening education. Science 323(5910):89–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Soylu A, Kuru S, Wild F, Mödrichter F (2008) e-Learning and microformats: a learning object harvesting model and a sample application. In: Proceedings Mupple’08 Workshop, pp 57–65

    Google Scholar 

  26. Staker H, Horn M (2012) Classifying K-12 Blended Learning. Innosight Institute. http://www.innosightinstitute.org/innosight/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Classifying-K-12-blended-learning2.pdf

  27. Ternier S, Verbert K, Parra G, Vandeputte B, Klerkx J, Duval E, Ordonez V, Ochoa X (2009) The Ariadne infrastructure for managing and storing metadata. IEEE Internet Comput 13:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhou L, Helou El S, Moccozet L, Opprecht L, Benkacem O, Salzmann C, Gillet D (2012) A federated recommender system for online learning environments. In: Popescu E, Li Q, Klamma R, Leung H, Specht M (Eds) Proceedings of the 11th international conference on advances in Web-based learning – ICWL 2012, Sinaia, Romania

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Walt Grata of the Advanced Distributed Learning Initiative (ADL, U.S Department of Defense) designed and implemented an early version of the learning resource relationship graph described in this chapter. Steve Midgley, US Department of Education, first suggested creating a graph representation of Learning Registry data using Neo4j. SRI International’s work on this project is supported by the US Department of Education (ED-04-CO-0040/0010).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Bienkowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bienkowski, M., Klo, J. (2014). The Learning Registry: Applying Social Metadata for Learning Resource Recommendations. In: Manouselis, N., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Santos, O. (eds) Recommender Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0530-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0530-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0529-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0530-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics