Abstract
Virtual worlds can allow conversational participants to achieve common ground in situations where the information volume and need for clarification is low. We argue in favor of this assertion through an examination of a semi-structured activity among hundreds of users held in a virtual world. Through the idea of implicit grounding, we argue that the affordances of contextualized space, knowledge of the social occasion, and creative self presentation allowed attendees to achieve common ground in a low information volume, low clarification need activity. We use the success of the event to reexamine and extend Clark and Brennan??s work on grounding in communication.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benford, S., Bowers, J., Fahl, L. E., Greenhalgh, C., and Snowdon, D. (1995): ’User embodiment in collaborative virtual environments’, in Proc. CHI 1995, ACM Press, pp. 242–249.
Benford, S., and Greenhalgh, C. (1997): ’Introducing Third Party Objects into the Spatial Model of Interaction’, in Proc. ECSCW 1997, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 189–204.
Birnholtz, J. P., Finholt, T. A., Horn, D. B., and Bae, S. J. (2005): ’Grounding needs: achieving common ground via lightweight chat in large, distributed, ad-hoc groups’, in Proc. CHI 2005, ACM Press, pp. 21–30.
Bly, S. A., Harrison, S. R., and Irwin, S. (1993): ’Media spaces: bringing people together in a video, audio, and computing environment’, Commun. ACM, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 28–46.
Bowers, J., Pycock, J., and O’Brien, J. (1996): ’Talk and embodiment in collaborative virtual environments’, in Proc. CHI 1996, ACM Press, pp. 58–65.
Clark, H. H., and Brennan, S. E. (1991): ‘Grounding in communication’, in L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine & S. Teasley (eds.): Perspectives on socially shared cognition (APA, Washington, 1991, pp. 127–149.
Clark, H. H., and Marshall, C. E. (1981): ’Definite reference and mutual knowledge.’, in A. K. Joshi, B. L. Webber & I. A. Sag (eds.): Elements of discourse understanding (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1981, pp. 10–63.
Clark, H. H., and Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986): ’Referring as a collaborative process’, Cognition, vol. 22, pp. 1–39.
Convertino, G., Mentis, H. M., Rosson, M. B., Slavkovic, A., and Carroll, J. M. (2009): ’Supporting content and process common ground in computer-supported teamwork’, in Proc. CHI 2009, ACM Press, pp. 2339–2348.
Dourish, P. (2006): ’Re-space-ing place: "place" and "space" ten years on’, in Proc. CSCW 2006, ACM Press, pp. 299–308.
Erickson, T., Shami, N. S., Kellogg, W. A., and Levine, D. (2011): ’Synchronous Interaction Among Hundreds: An Evaluation of a Conference in an Avatar-based Virtual Environment’, in Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press.
Fraser, M., Benford, S., Hindmarsh, J., and Heath, C. (1999): ’Supporting awareness and interaction through collaborative virtual interfaces’, in Proc. UIST 1999, ACM Press, pp. 27–36.
Gergle, D., Kraut, R. E., and Fussell, S. R. (2004): ’Action as language in a shared visual space’, in Proc. CSCW 2004, ACM Press, pp. 487–496.
Greenhalgh, C., and Benford, S. (1995): ’MASSIVE: a collaborative virtual environment for teleconferencing’, ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 239–261.
Heldal, I., Steed, A., Spante, M., Schroeder, R., Bengtsson, S., and Partanen, M. (2005): ’Successes and Failures in Co-Present Situations’, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 563–579.
Hindmarsh, J., Fraser, M., Heath, C., Benford, S., and Greenhalgh, C. (1998): ’Fragmented interaction: establishing mutual orientation in virtual environments’, in Proc. CSCW 1998, ACM Press, pp. 217–226.
Kelly, J. W., Beall, A. C., and Loomis, J. M. (2004): ’Perception of Shared Visual Space: Establishing Common Ground in Real and Virtual Environments’, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 442–450.
Kraut, R., Fussell, S. R., Brennan, S. E., and Siegel, J. (2002): ’Understanding the effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work’, in P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (eds.): Distributed Work (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002, pp. 137–162.
Kraut, R., Fussell, S. R., and Siegel, J. (2003): ’Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasks’, Hum.-Comput. Interact., vol. 18, pp. 13–49.
Sellen, A., Buxton, B., and Arnott, J. (1992): ’Using spatial cues to improve videoconferencing’, in Proc. CHI 1992, ACM Press, pp. 651–652.
Traum, D., and Rickel, J. (2002): ’Embodied agents for multi-party dialogue in immersive virtual worlds’, in Proc. AAMAS 2002, ACM Press, pp. 766–773.
Veinott, E. S., Olson, J., Olson, G. M., and Fu, X. (1999): ’Video helps remote work: speakers who need to negotiate common ground benefit from seeing each other’, in Proc. CHI 1999, ACM Press, pp. 302–309.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
Shami, N.S., Erickson, T., Kellogg, W.A. (2011). Common Ground and Small Group Interaction in Large Virtual World Gatherings. In: Bødker, S., Bouvin, N., Wulf, V., Ciolfi, L., Lutters, W. (eds) ECSCW 2011: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 24-28 September 2011, Aarhus Denmark. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-913-0_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-913-0_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-912-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-913-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)