Abstract
When optimizing with evolutionary algorithms in a continuous search space, mutations usually are distributed according to a Gaussian. A Gaussian distribution decays exponentially, i. e. very large mutations are highly unlikely. This bears the risk of the optimization getting caught in local extrema. A more slowly decaying distribution, e. g. a Cauchy distribution, may circumvent this problem. A Cauchy distribution allows for rare large mutations. In this paper the performance of Gaussian and Cauchy distributed mutations, in particular their robustness and rate of progress, are compared analytically and numerically in a number of examples. It turns out that, in one dimension, an algorithm working with Cauchy distributed mutations is both more robust and faster. This result cannot easily be generalized to higher dimensions, where the additional problem of finding the right direction for leaving a saddle point appears. The analysis of a simple two dimensional problem does not yet allow to draw final conclusions concerning which kind of mutations, if any, is preferable in higher dimensions.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
I. Rechenberg, “Evolutionsstrategie, Optimierung technischer Systeme nach Prinzipien der biologischen Evolution”, Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart (1973)
I. Rechenberg, “Evolutionsstrategie '94”, Vol. 1 of Werkstatt Bionik und Evolution-stechnik, Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart (1994)
H.-P. Schwefel, “Evolution and optimum seeking”, John Wiley & Sons Inc. (1995)
J.-P. Bouchard and A. Georges, “Anomalous diffusion in disordered media: statistical mechanics, models and physical applications”, Phys. Rep. 195, 127 (1990)
H. Szu and R. Hartley, “Fast simulated annealing”, Phys. Lett. A 122, 157 (1987)
L. Ingber “Very fast simulated re-annealing”, J. Math. Comp. Modelling 12, 967 (1989)
An evolutionary algorithm without cross over is characterized by (Μ 355-01 λ), where Μ is the number of parents, and λ the number of children in each generation. In a (Μ, λ) strategy, the Μ parents of the next generation are the Μ best of the λ children. In a (Μ+λ) strategy, the parents of the next generation are the Μ best of both parents and children of the last generation. See also Refs. [1, 2, 3].
C. W. Gardiner “Handbook of stochastic methods”, 2nd ed., Springer (1994)
M. Conrad, W. Ebeling “M. V. Volkenstein, evolutionary thinking and the structure of fitness landscapes”, BioSystems 27, 125 (1992)
Z. Michalewicz “Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures=Evolution Programs”, Springer (1992).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kappler, C. (1996). Are evolutionary algorithms improved by large mutations?. In: Voigt, HM., Ebeling, W., Rechenberg, I., Schwefel, HP. (eds) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN IV. PPSN 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1141. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61723-X_999
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61723-X_999
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61723-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70668-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive