Abstract
As a form of knowledge acquisition from data, we consider the problem of deciding whether there exists an extension of a partially defined Boolean function with missing data \((\tilde T,\tilde F)\), where \(\tilde T\) (resp., \(\tilde F\)) is a set of positive (resp., negative) examples. Here, “*” denotes a missing bit in the data, and it is assumed that \(\tilde T \subseteq\) {0,1,*}n and \(\tilde F \subseteq\) {0,1,*}n hold. A Boolean function f: {0,1}n → {0,1} is an extension of \((\tilde T,\tilde F)\) if it is true (resp., false) for the Boolean vectors corresponding to positive (resp., negative) examples; more precisely, we define three types of extensions called consistent, robust and most robust, depending upon how to deal with missing bits. We then provide polynomial time algorithms or prove their NP-hardness for the problems under various restrictions.
This research was partially supported by ONR (Grants N00014-92-J-1375 and N00014-92-J-4083), and the Scientific Grants in Aid by the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan. The visit of the first author to Kyoto University was made possible by Grant 06044112 of the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan. The third author is supported by Research Fellowships of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angluin, D.: Queries and concept learning. Machine Learning 2 (1988) 319–342
Apswall, B., Plass, M.F., Tarjan, R.E.: A linear-time algorithm for testing the truth of certain quantified Boolean formulas. Information Processing Letters 8 (1979) 121–123
Boros, E., Hammer, P. L., Hooker, J. N.: Predicting cause-effect relationships from incomplete discrete observations. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 7 (1994) 531–543
Boros, E., Ibaraki, T., Makino, K.: Error-free and best-fit extensions of a partially defined Boolean function. RUTCOR Research Report RRR 14–95, Rutgers University (1995)
Boros, E., Ibaraki, T., Makino, K.: Extensions of partially defined Boolean functions with missing data. RUTCOR Research Report RRR 06–96, Rutgers University (1996)
Crama, Y., Hammer, P. L., Ibaraki, T.: Cause-effect relationships and partially defined boolean functions. Annals of Operations Research 16 (1988) 299–326
Dechter, R., Pearl, J.: Structure identification in relational data. Artificial Intelligence 58 (1992) 237–270
Ford, L. R., Fulkerson, D. R.: Flows in Networks. Princeton University Press (1962)
Garey, M. R., Johnson, D. S.: Computers and Intractability. Freeman, New York (1979)
Quinlan, J. R.: Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning 1 (1986) 81–106
Valiant, L. G.: A theory of the learnable. Communications of the ACM 27 (1984) 1134–1142
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Boros, E., Ibaraki, T., Makino, K. (1996). Boolean analysis of incomplete examples. In: Karlsson, R., Lingas, A. (eds) Algorithm Theory — SWAT'96. SWAT 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1097. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61422-2_152
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61422-2_152
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61422-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68529-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive