Designing multimedia interfaces | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Designing multimedia interfaces

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human-Computer Interaction (EWHCI 1993)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 753))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Multimedia interfaces are currently created by intuition. Development of a method for analysis and design of multimedia presentation interfaces is described. The study investigates task based information analysis, persistence of information, selection attention and concurrency in presentation. The method gives an agenda of issues, diagrams and techniques for specification, and guidelines for media selection and presentation scripting. Use of the method is illustrated with a case study of shipboard emergency management.

The help of Lloyds Register, UK is gratefully acknowledged. Thanks in particular to Clive Bright, John Hobday and Derek Rhoden of Lloyds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Alty & C.D.C. McCartney: Design of a Multi-media Presentation System for a Process Control Enviroment. Eurographics Multimedia workshop: Stockholm (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Andre & T. Rist: Generating Illustrated Documents: A plan based approach. InfoJapan 90, Vol 2, 163–170 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. D.J. Bartram: Comprehending spatial information: The relative efficiency of different methods of presenting information about bus routes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 103–110 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Becklem & D. Cervone: Selective looking and the noticing of unexpected events. Memory & Cognition, 11(6), 601–608 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  5. G.R. Bieger & M.D. Glock: The Information Content of Picture-Text Instructions. Journal of Experimental Education, 53, 68–76 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  6. H.R. Booher: Relative Comprehensibility of Pictorial Information and Printed word in Proceduralized Instructions. Human Factors, 17(3), 266–277 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Fiener & K.R. McKeown: Generating Co-ordinated Multimedia Explanations. In 6th IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications (Santa Barbara CA) (Pg 290–296) (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. Grimes: Mild Auditory-Visual dissonance in TV News may exceed viewer attention. Human Communication Research 18(2) 268–298 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. G.J. Hitch: Working memory. In B. Christie & M. Gardiner (eds.): Applying cognitive psychology to user interface design. London: J. Wiley (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Johnson, H. Johnson, R. Waddington, & A. Shouls: Task-Related Knowledge Structures: Analysis. Modelling and Application. In D.M. Jones, R. Winder (eds.): People and Computers IV. Cambridge University Press. (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.B. Long & J. Dowell: Conceptions of the Discipline of HCI: Craft, Applied Science and Engineering. In A.G. Sutcliffe, L. Macaulay (eds.): People and Computers V., Cambridge University Press. (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  12. W.C. Mann & S.A Thompson: Rhetorical Structure Theory — Toward a functional theory of text organisation. Text, 8(3), 243–281 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Maybury: Planning Multimedia Explanations Using Communicative Acts. In Proceedings of 9th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Pg 61–66) (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Miller: Timecourse of coactivation in bimodal divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(5), 331–343 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Navon & J. Miller: Role of Outcome Conflict in Dual Task Interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13(3), 435–448(1987)

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Petre & T.R.G. Green: Is graphical notation really superior to text, or just different ? Some claims by logic designers about graphics in notation. In Fifth European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (Urbino, Italy) (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Posner: Visual Dominance: An Information Processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review, 83, 157–171 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  18. L.P. Rieber: Animation in Computer Based Instruction. Educational Technology Research & Development, 38, 77–86 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.R Searle: Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  20. C.D. Wickens: Processing Resources in Attention. In R. Pararsuraman & D. Davies (eds.): Varieties of Attention (Pg 63–102). New York: Academic Press (1983)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for HCI Design, School of Informatics, City University, Northampton Square, EC1 0HB, London, UK

    Alistair Sutcliffe & Peter Faraday

Authors
  1. Alistair Sutcliffe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Faraday
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Leonard J. Bass Juri Gornostaev Claus Unger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sutcliffe, A., Faraday, P. (1993). Designing multimedia interfaces. In: Bass, L.J., Gornostaev, J., Unger, C. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. EWHCI 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 753. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57433-6_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57433-6_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57433-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48152-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation