Abstract
Information visualizations have become popular tools for extracting knowledge from large bodies of information. Very little is known on the usability of such ‘visual knowledge tools’ for information access. The goal of this paper is to show the usability of the spatial metaphor ‘scale’ to access a large semantic document space. An experiment was conducted to examine whether different user groups can associate graphical changes in resolution in spatialized views with changes of level of detail in an index hierarchy of a digital document collection. Test participants were asked to utilize zoom tools to explore a spatialized subset of the GeoRef database, an extensive collection of geology and earth sciences documents. The outcomes of the experiment suggest that people are able to associate graphical changes in resolution of spatialized views (zooms) with changes in levels of detail of a document collection (hierarchical order). These results are independent of user group membership, but for some displays it takes people longer to make a decision.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D., and Shneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in Information Visualization. Using Vision to Think, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.
Catarci, T. (2000). What’s New in Visual Query Systems? Proceedings, First International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Savannah, GA, Oct. 28–31, 2000. (http://www.giscience.org/GIScience2000/invited/Catarci.pdf)
Chen, C., Czerwinski, M., (Eds.) (2000). Special Issue on Empirical Evaluation of Information Visualisations. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 53(5).
Chen, C., Czerwinski, M., and Macredie R. (Eds.) (2000). Special Issue on Individual Differences in Virtual Environments. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 51(6).
Chen, C. and Yue, Y. (2000). Empirical Studies of Information Visualization: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53: 851–866.
Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., and Derman, D. (1976). Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests. Princeton, NJ, Educational Testing Service.
Fabrikant, S. I. and Buttenfield, B. P. (2001). Formalizing Semantic Spaces For Information Access. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91: 263–280.
Fabrikant, S. I. (2000). Spatial Metaphors for Browsing Large Data Archives. Unpublished Disseration, University of Colorado-Boulder, Department of Geography, Boulder, CO.
Freundschuh, S. M. and Egenhofer, M. J. (1997). Human Conceptions of Spaces: Implications for GIS. Transactions in GIS, 2: 361–374.
Golledge, R. G. (1995). Primitives of Spatial Knowledge. In Cognitive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction for Geographic Information Systems, Nyerges, T. L., Mark, D. M., Laurini, R., and Egenhofer, M. J. (eds.), Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic: 29–44.
Goodman, B. A. (1997). GeoRef Thesaurus. Alexandria, VA, American Geological Institute.
Knoke, D. and Burke, P. J. (1980). Log-Linear Models. Sage University Paper Number 20. Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publications.
Kraak, M. J. (1988). Computer-Assited Cartographical Three-Dimensional Imaging Techniques. Dissertation. Delft, The Netherlands, Delft University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, And Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About The Mind. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.
Lewis, C. (1991). Inner and Outer Theory in HCI. In Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interaction Interface, Carroll, J. M. (ed.), Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press: 154–161.
McNamara, T. P., Hardy, J. K., and Hirtle, S. C. (1989). Subjective Hierarchies in Spatial Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15: 211–227.
Montello, D. R., Golledge, R. G. (1999). Scale and Detail in the Cognition of Geographic Information. Varenius Project Report, Specialist Meeting, May 14–16, 1998, Santa Barbara, CA.
Morse, E., Lewis, M., and Olsen, K. A. (2000). Evaluating Visualizations: Using a Taxonomic Guide. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 53: 637–662.
Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. Boston, MA, Academic Press.
Norman, D. A. (1993). Things That Make Us Smart. Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.
Pirolli, P., Card, S. K., and Van Der Wege, M. M. (2000). Visual Information Foraging in a Focus + Context Visualization. Xerox PARC, Technical Report, IR-R-2000-14. URL: http://www.parc.xerox.com/istl/projects/uir/pubs/pdf/UIRR-2000-14-Pirolli-TechReport-VIFinFocusContext.pdf (Jan. 2001).
Robertson, G. (1998). Keynote Address: Leveraging Human Capabilities in Information Perceptualizationd. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis’ 98), Oct. 19–20, 1998, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. URL: http://www.research.microsoft.com/~ggr/infovis98.ppt (Jan. 2001).
Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.
Stasko, J., Catrambone, R., Guzdial, M., and McDonald, K. (2000). An Evaluation of Space-Filling Information Visualizations for Depicting Hierarchical Structures. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53: 663–694.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fabrikant, S.I. (2001). Evaluating the Usability of the Scale Metaphor for Querying Semantic Spaces. In: Montello, D.R. (eds) Spatial Information Theory. COSIT 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2205. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45424-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45424-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42613-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45424-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive