Comparison of Ten Methods for the Solution of Large and Sparse Linear Algebraic Systems | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Comparison of Ten Methods for the Solution of Large and Sparse Linear Algebraic Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Numerical Methods and Applications (NMA 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2542))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The treatment of systems of linear algebraic equations is very often the most time-consuming part when large-scale applications arising in different fields of science and engineering are to be handled on computers. These systems can be very large, but in the most of the cases they are sparse (i.e. many of the elements in their coefficient matrices are zeros). Therefore, it is very important to select fast, robust and sufficiently accurate methods for the solution of large and sparse systems of linear algebraic equations. Tests with ten well-known methods have been carried out. Most of the methods are preconditioned conjugate gradient-type methods. Two important issues are mainly discussed: (i) the problem of finding automatically a good preconditioner and (ii) the development of robust and reliable stopping criteria. Numerical examples, which illustrate the efficiency of the developed algorithms for finding the preconditioner and for stopping the iterations when the required accuracy is achieved, are presented. The performance of the different methods for solving systems of linear algebraic equations is compared. Several conclusions are drawn, the main of them being the fact that it is necessary to include several different methods for the solution of large and sparse systems of linear algebraic equations in software designed to be used in the treatment of large-scale scientific and engineering problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 11439
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 14299
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eirola, T. and Nevanlinna, O.: Accelerating with rank-one updates. Lin. Alg. Appl., Vol. 121 (1989) 511–520.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Freund, R. W.: A transpose-free quasi-minimal residual algorithm for non-Hermitian linear systems. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., Vol. 14 (1993) 470–482.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Gallivan, K. A., Sameh, A. H., and Zlatev, Z.: A parallel hybrid sparse linear system solver. Computing Systems in Engineering, Vol. 1 (1990) 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Saad, Y. and Schultz, M. H.: GMRES: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., Vol. 7 (1986) 856–869.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Sonneveld, P.: CGS, a fast Lanczos-type solver for nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., Vol. 10 (1989) 36–52.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Vinsome, P.: ORTHOMIN, an iterative method for solving sparse sets of simultaneous linear equations. Proc. Fourth Sympos. on Reservoir Simulation, Society of Petr. Eng. of AIME (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  7. van der Vorst, H. A.: BI-CGSTAB: A fast and smoothly converging variant of BICG for the solution of nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., Vol. 13 (1992) 631–644.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Vuik, C. and van der Vorst, H. A.: A comparison of some GMRES-like methods. Lin. Alg. Appl., Vol. 160 (1992) 131–160.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang, U. Meier and Gallivan, K.: A Family of Preconditioned Iterative Solvers for Sparse Linear Systems. Applied Numerical Mathematics, Vol. 30 (1999) 155–173.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Zlatev, Z.: On some pivotal strategies in Gaussian elimination by sparse technique. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., Vol. 17 (1980) 18–30.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Zlatev, Z.: Use of iterative refinement in the solution of sparse linear systems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., Vol. 19 (1982) 381–399.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Zlatev, Z.: Computational methods for general sparse matrices. Mathematics and Its Applications, Vol. 65, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht-Boston-London (1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gallivan, K.A., Sameh, A.H., Zlatev, Z. (2003). Comparison of Ten Methods for the Solution of Large and Sparse Linear Algebraic Systems. In: Dimov, I., Lirkov, I., Margenov, S., Zlatev, Z. (eds) Numerical Methods and Applications. NMA 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2542. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36487-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36487-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00608-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36487-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics