Comparison of Reasoning for Fuzzy Control | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Comparison of Reasoning for Fuzzy Control

  • Conference paper
Computational Intelligence, Theory and Applications

Part of the book series: Advances in Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 33))

  • 775 Accesses

Abstract

Researchers proposed many reasoning methods. However, many of the methods are suitable neither for fuzzy control nor for fuzzy modeling. In the paper some possible reasoning methods are compared from this point of view. The most popular approach to fuzzy control and modeling is based on if ... then rules. Using this approach four general problems must be solved:

  • what interpretations of sentence connectives “and” “or” and negation “not” may be used for if part

  • what implication or other operation may be used for conclusion (then) part

  • what interpretation to use for rule aggregator “also”

  • what defuzzification procedure can be applied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 34319
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 42899
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Butnariu D., Klement E.P., Zafrany S. (1995). On triangular norm-based prepositional fuzzy logics. Fuzzy Sets and Systems v. 69, pp. 241–255.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Butkiewicz B.S. (1998). Steady-State Error of a System with Fuzzy Controller. IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B: Cybernetics, 6, 855–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Butkiewicz B.S. (2001). Fuzzy Control System with B-operations. In: R. John, R. Birkenhead (eds.), Advances in Soft Computing, Developments in Soft Computing, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, New York, pp. 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Butkiewicz B.S. (2001). About Robustness of Fuzzy Logic PD and PID Controller under Changes of Reasoning Methods. In: Advances in Computational Intelligence and Learning Methods and Applications, H-J. Zimmermann, G. Tselentis, M. van Someren, G. Dounias (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 307–318.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Butkiewicz B. S. (2004). Comparison of Reasoning Methods for Fuzzy Control. In: L. Rutkowski, J. Siekmann, R. Tadeusiewicz, L. Zadeh (eds.), Springer, pp. 278–283.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen C.-L., Chen P.-C., Chen C.-K. (1993). Analysis and Design of Fuzzy Control System. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, v. 57, pp. 125–140.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Cao Z., Kandel A. (1989). Applicability of Some Fuzzy Implications Operators. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, v. 31, pp. 151–186.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Czogaa E., ski J. (2201). On equivalence of approximate reasoning results using different interpretations of fuzzy if-then rules. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, v. 117, pp. 279–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dyckhoff H., Pedrycz W. (1984). Generalized means as model of compensative connectives. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, v. 14, 143–154.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta M.M., Qi J. (1991). Theory of t-norms and fuzzy inference methods. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, v. 40, No. 3, pp. 431–450.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Kerre E. (1992). A comparative study of the behavior of some popular fuzzy implication operators on the generalized modus ponens. In Zadeh L., Kacprzyk J. (eds.) Fuzzy logic for management of uncertainty. Wiley, New York, pp. 281–295.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klement E.P., Mesiar R., Pap E. (2000). Triangular norms. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Larsen P.M. (1980). Industrial Applications of Fuzzy Logic Control. Int. J. Man Machine Stud., v. 12, No. 1, 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee E.S., Zhu Q. (1995). Fuzzy and Evidence Reasoning. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Li Z. (1999). Suitability of fuzzy reasoning methods. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, v. 108, pp.299–311.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Mizumoto M. (1985). Extended fuzzy reasoning. In: Approximate Reasoning in Decision Analysis, M.M. Gupta, A. Kandel, W. Bandler, J.B. Kiszka (eds.), North-Holland, New York, pp. 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mizumoto M. (1995). Improvement of Fuzzy Control Method. In: Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems, Li H. Gupta M. (ed.), Kluwer Acad. Publishers, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pedrycz W. (1996). Fuzzy Control and Fuzzy Systems. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pedrycz W. (1980). On the use of fuzzy ukasiewicz logic for fuzzy control. Arch. Autom., v. 3, pp. 301–313.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schwartz D.G. (1989). Fuzzy inference in a formal theory of semantic equivalence. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, v. 31, pp. 205–216.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Takagi T., Sugeno M. (1985). Fuzzy Identification of Systems and its Application to Modeling and Control. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, v. 15, No.1, 116–132.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Butkiewicz, B. (2005). Comparison of Reasoning for Fuzzy Control. In: Reusch, B. (eds) Computational Intelligence, Theory and Applications. Advances in Soft Computing, vol 33. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31182-3_67

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31182-3_67

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22807-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31182-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics