Directed Model Checking with Distance-Preserving Abstractions | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Directed Model Checking with Distance-Preserving Abstractions

  • Conference paper
Model Checking Software (SPIN 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3925))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In directed model checking, the traversal of the state space is guided by an estimate of the distance from the current state to the nearest error state. This paper presents a distance-preserving abstraction for concurrent systems that allows one to compute an interesting estimate of the error distance without hitting the state explosion problem. Our experiments show a dramatic reduction both in the number of states explored by the model checker and in the total runtime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Behrmann, G., Fehnker, A., Hune, T., Larsen, K.G., Pettersson, P., Romijn, J.: Efficient guiding towards cost-optimality in uppaal. In: Margaria, T., Yi, W. (eds.) TACAS 2001. LNCS, vol. 2031, pp. 174–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bloem, R., Ravi, K., Somenzi, F.: Symbolic guided search for CTL model checking. In: Design Automation Conference, pp. 29–34 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dierks, H.: Comparing model checking and logical reasoning for real-time systems. Formal Aspects of Computing 16(2), 104–120 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Edelkamp, S., Leue, S., Lluch-Lafuente, A.: Directed explicit-state model checking in the validation of communication protocols. Software Tools for Technology Transfer (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edelkamp, S., Lluch-Lafuente, A.: Abstraction databases in theory and model checking. In: Proc. ICAPS Workshop on Connecting Planning Theory with Practice (June 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Edelkamp, S., Lluch-Lafuente, A., Leue, S.: Directed explicit model checking with HSF-SPIN. In: Dwyer, M.B. (ed.) SPIN 2001. LNCS, vol. 2057, pp. 57–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Edelkamp, S., Lluch-Lafuente, A., Leue, S.: Trail-directed model checking. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 55(3) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Graf, S., Steffen, B., Lüttgen, G.: Compositional minimization of finite state systems using interface specifications. Formal Aspects of Computing 8, 607–616 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Groce, A., Visser, W.: Heuristics for model checking Java programs. In: Bošnački, D., Leue, S. (eds.) SPIN 2002. LNCS, vol. 2318, pp. 242–245. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaltenbach, M., Misra, J.: A theory of hints in model checking. In: Aichernig, B.K., Maibaum, T. (eds.) Formal Methods at the Crossroads. From Panacea to Foundational Support. LNCS, vol. 2757, pp. 423–438. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Krieg-Brückner, B., Peleska, J., Olderog, E.-R., Baer, A.: The UniForM workbench, a universal development environment for formal methods. In: Wing, J., Woodcock, J., Davies, J. (eds.) FM 1999. LNCS, vol. 1709, p. 1186. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kupferschmid, S., Hoffmann, J., Dierks, H., Behrmann, G.: Adapting an AI planning heuristic for directed model checking. In: Valmari, A. (ed.) SPIN 2006. LNCS, vol. 3925, pp. 35–52. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Lafuente, A.L.: Directed Search for the Verification of Communication Protocols. PhD thesis, Institute of Computer Science, University of Freiburg (June 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Larsen, K., Petterson, P., Yi, W.: Uppaal in a nutshell. STTT – International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer 1(1, 2), 134–152 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsumoto, M., Nishimura, T.: Mersenne Twister: A 623-dimensionally equidistributed uniform pseudo-random number generator. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation 8(1), 3–30 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Pearl, J.: Heuristics. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1983)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Qian, K., Nymeyer, A.: Guided invariant model checking based on abstraction and symbolic pattern databases. In: Jensen, K., Podelski, A. (eds.) TACAS 2004. LNCS, vol. 2988, pp. 497–511. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Sabnani, K.K., Lapone, A.M., Uyar, M.Ü.: An algorithmic procedure for checking safety properties of protocols. IEEE Trans. Commun. 37(9), 940–948 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Seitz, C.: Ideas about arbiters. Lambda, 10–14 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yang, C.H., Dill, D.L.: Validation with guided search of the state space. In: Design Automation Conference, pp. 599–604 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dräger, K., Finkbeiner, B., Podelski, A. (2006). Directed Model Checking with Distance-Preserving Abstractions. In: Valmari, A. (eds) Model Checking Software. SPIN 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3925. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11691617_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11691617_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-33102-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33103-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics