An Interstage Change Model for Sandbox Geography | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

An Interstage Change Model for Sandbox Geography

  • Conference paper
GeoSpatial Semantics (GeoS 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3799))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 730 Accesses

Abstract

Formal models for incremental ontologies are needed in geographic information systems. While there are methods to describe ontologies for a certain purpose, it is still an open question, how to link different geographic ontologies. Observing children in a sandbox can motivate a new way of designing dynamic spatio-temporal ontologies. Contemporary developmental psychology provides evidence that knowledge about the world is acquired in piecemeal fashion. Infants form theory like concepts of the world that are revised in the light of new evidence [12]. We take these findings to build multi tiered ontologies grounded in children’s spatial experience. Questions of how to structure and connect the ontologies will be addressed. The formalization of spatial concepts are investigated in an agent based approach using an algebraic framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baillargeon, R.: Infants’ reasoning about hidden objects: evidence for event-general and event-specific expectations. Developmental Science 7(4), 391–424 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bower, T.G.R.: The Rational Infant - Learning In Infancy. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carey, S.: Bootstrap knowledge, Deadalus, Winter, pp. 59–68 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Casati, R.: The structure of shadows. In: Time and Motion of Socio-Economic Units, pp. 99–109. Taylor and Francis, Abington (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Couclelis, H., Gale, N.: Space and Spaces. Geografiska Annaler 68B(1), 1–12 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Egenhofer, M.J., Mark, D.M.: Naive Geography. In: Frank, A.U., Kuhn, W. (eds.) COSIT 1995. LNCS, vol. 988, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Egenhofer, M.J., Rodriguez, A.M.: Relation Algebras over Containers and Surfaces: An Ontological Study of a Room Space. Journal of Spatial Cognition and Computation 1(2), 155–180 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Frank, A.U.: Specifications for interoperability: formalizing spatial relations ’in’, ’auf’ and ’an’ and the corresponding image schemata ’container’, ’surface’ and ’link’. Internal report, Dept. of Geoinformation, Technical University Vienna (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frank, A.U.: One Step Up the Abstraction Ladder: Combining Algebras - From Functional Pieces to a Whole. In: Freksa, C., Mark, D.M. (eds.) COSIT 1999, vol. 1661, pp. 95–107. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Frank, A.U.: Tiers of ontology and consistency constraints in geographic information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 5(7 (Special Issue on Ontology of Geographic Information)), 667–678 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Freundschuh, S.M., Egenhofer, M.J.: Human Conceptions of Spaces: Implications for Geographic Information Systems. Transactions in GIS 2(4), 361–375 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A.N.: Words, thoughts, and theories. In: Learning, Development, and Conceptual Change. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hart, R.A., Moore, G.T.: The development of spatial cognition of large scale environments: a review. Technical report, Clark University (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hiraki, K., Sashima, A., Phillips, S.: From Egocentric to Allocentric Spatial Behavior: A Computational Model of Spatial Development. Adaptive Behaviour 6(3/4), 371–391 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuhn, T.S.: Die Struktur wissenschaftlicher Revolutionen. suhrkamp taschenbuch wissenschaft, Frankfurt (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kuipers, B.: Modeling spatial knowledge. Cognitive Science 2(2), 129–153 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Loeckx, J., Ehrich, H.-D., Markus, W.: Specification of abstract data types. John Wiley and B.G. Teubner, Chichester (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Luger, G.F., Wishart, J.G., Bower, T.G.R.: Modelling the stages of the identity theory of object-concept development in infancy. Perception 13, 97–115 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Luo, Y., Baillargeon, R.: When the ordinary seems unexpected: evidence for rule-based physical reasoning in young infants. Cognition 95(3), 297–328 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lynch, K.: The image of the city. MIT Press, Cambridge (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mark, D., Freksa, C., Hirtle, S., Lloyd, R., Tversky, B.: Cognitive models of geographical space. IJGIS 13(8), 747–774 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Montello, D.R.: Scale and multiple psychologies of space. In: Cosit, pp. 312–321 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Newcombe, N.S., Huttenlocher, J.: Making space: the development of spatial representation and reasoning. In: Learning, Development, and Conceptual Change. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Piaget, J.P., Inhelder, B.: Die Entwicklung des räumlichen Denkens beim Kinde, 3rd edn., vol. 6. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart (1999) (translated by Heipcke, R.)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Siegel, A.W., White, S.H.: The Development of Spatial Representations of Large-Scale Environments. In: Advances in Child Development and Behavior, vol. 10, ch. 2, pp. 9–55. Academic Press, London (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Spelke, E.S.: Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science 14, 29–56 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Geoinformation and Cartography, Technical University Vienna, Gusshausstrasse 27 – 29, 1040, Vienna, Austria

    Florian A. Twaroch

Authors
  1. Florian A. Twaroch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Web Research, Chile

    M. Andrea Rodríguez

  2. Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, 851 South Morgan Street (M/C 152), 60607, Chicago, IL, USA

    Isabel Cruz

  3. National Polytechnic, Institute, Mexico, Centro de Investigacion en Computacion, Mexico

    Sergei Levashkin

  4. National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis and Department of Spatial Information Science and Engineering, University of Maine, Boardman Hall, 04469-5711, Orono, ME, USA

    Max J. Egenhofer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Twaroch, F.A. (2005). An Interstage Change Model for Sandbox Geography. In: Rodríguez, M.A., Cruz, I., Levashkin, S., Egenhofer, M.J. (eds) GeoSpatial Semantics. GeoS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3799. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11586180_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11586180_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30288-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32283-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation