An Evolutionary Game-Theoretic Comparison of Two Double-Auction Market Designs | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3435))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we describe an analysis of two double auction markets—the clearing house auction and the continuous double auction. The complexity of these institutions is such that they defy analysis using traditional game-theoretic techniques, and so we use heuristic-strategy approximation to provide an approximated game-theoretic analysis. As well as finding heuristic-strategy equilibria for these mechanisms, we subject them to an evolutionary game-theoretic analysis which allows us to quantify which equilibria are more likely to occur. We then weight the design objectives for each mechanism according to the probability distribution over equilibria, which allows us to provide more realistic estimates for the efficiency of each mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angeline, P.J., Pollack, J.B.: Competitive environments evolve better solutions for complex tasks. In: Forrest, S. (ed.) Genetic Algorithms: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference (GA 1993) (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bryant, W.D.A.: Information, adjustment and the stability of equilibrium. Technical Report 6/2000, Department of Economics. Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cliff, D.: Evolution of market mechanism through a continuous space of auction-types. Technical Report HPL-2001-326, HP Labs (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cliff, D., Bruten, J.: Minimal-intelligence agents for bargaining behaviors in market-based environments. Technical report, HP Labs (1997), http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/97/HPL-97-91.html

  5. Erev, I., Roth, A.E.: Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria. American Economic Review 88(4), 848–881 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Friedman, D.: The double auction market institution: A survey. In: Friedman, Rust (eds.) The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories and Evidence, Santa Fe Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Westview. ch. 1, pp. 3–26 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Friedman, D., Rust, J. (eds.): The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories and Evidence, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, vol. XIV, Westview (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gjerstad, S., Dickhaut, J.: Price formation in double auctions. Games and Economic Behaviour 22, 1–29 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Klemperer, P.: How (not) to run auctions: the European 3G telecom auctions. European Economic Review 46(4-5), 829–845 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. MacKenzie, D.A.: An equation and its worlds: Bricolage, exemplars, disunity and performativity in financial economics. Social Studies of Science 33, 831–868 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Matsumoto, M., Nishimura, T.: Mersenne twister: A 623-dimensionally equidistributed uniform pseudo-random number generator. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation 8(1), 3–30 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Mirowski, P.: Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Myerson, R.B., Satterthwaite, M.A.: Efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading. Journal of Economic Theory 28, 265–281 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Nicolaisen, J., Petrov, V., Tesfatsion, L.: Market power and efficiency in a computational electricity market with discriminatory double-auction pricing. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 5(5), 504–523 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ockenfels, A., Roth, A.E.: The timing of bids in internet auctions: market design, bidder behaviour, and artificial agents. AI Magazine (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Phelps, S., McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Sklar, E.: Co-evolutionary mechanism design: a preliminary report. In: Padget, J., Parkes, D.C., Sadeh, N.M., Shehory, O., Walsh, W.E. (eds.) Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce IV. AAMAS 2002, Bologna, Italy (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Phelps, S., Parsons, S., Sklar, E., McBurney, P.: Using genetic programming to optimise pricing rules for a double auction market. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Agents for Electronic Commerce, Pittsburgh (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Preist, C., van Tol, M.: Adaptive agents in a persistent shout double auction.Technical Report HPL-2003-242, Hewlett Packard Labs (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Satterthwaite, M.A., Williams, S.R.: The Bayseian theory of the k-double auction. In: Friedman, Rust (eds.) The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories and Evidence, Santa Fe Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Westview, ch. 4, pp. 99–123 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Smith, J.M.: Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith, V.L.: An experimental study of competitive market behaviour. The Journal of Political Economy 70(2), 111–137 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tesauro, G., Das, R.: High-performance bidding agents for the continuous double auction. In: Third ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 206–209 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Walsh, W.E., Das, R., Tesauro, G., Kephart, J.O.: Analyzing complex strategic interactions in multi-agent games. In: AAAI 2002 Workshop on Game Theoretic and Decision Theoretic Agents (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Walsh, W.E., Parkes, D.C., Das, R.: Choosing samples to compute heuristic-strategy nash equilibrium. In: Faratin, P., Parkes, D.C., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.-A., Walsh, W.E. (eds.) AMEC 2003. LNCS, vol. 3048, pp. 109–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Phelps, S., Parsons, S., McBurney, P. (2006). An Evolutionary Game-Theoretic Comparison of Two Double-Auction Market Designs. In: Faratin, P., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A. (eds) Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce VI. Theories for and Engineering of Distributed Mechanisms and Systems. AMEC 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3435. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11575726_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11575726_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29737-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33166-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics