Building and Using Quorums Despite any Number of Process of Crashes | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Building and Using Quorums Despite any Number of Process of Crashes

  • Conference paper
Dependable Computing - EDCC 5 (EDCC 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 3463))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Failure detectors of the class denoted \(\mathcal{P}^t\) eventually suspect all crashed processes in a permanent way (completeness) and ensure that, at any time, no more than nt – 1 alive processes are falsely suspected (accuracy), n being the total number of processes. This paper first shows that a simple combination of such a failure detector with a two-step communication pattern can provide the processes with an interesting intersection property on sets of values. As an example illustrating the benefit and the property that such a combination can provide when designing protocols, a leader-based consensus protocol whose design relies on its systematic use is presented. Then the paper presents a \(\mathcal{P}^t\)-based protocol that builds quorums in systems where up to t processes can crash with t < n.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anceaume, E., Fernandez, A., Mostéfaoui, A., Neiger, G., Raynal, M.: Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Transforming Limited Accuracy Failure Detectors. Journal of Computer and System Science (JCSS) 68, 123–133 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Attiya, H., Bar-Noy, A., Dolev, D.: Sharing Memory Robustly in Message Passing Systems. Journal of the ACM 42(1), 121–132 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bermond, J.-C., Koenig, J.-C., Raynal, M.: Generalized and Efficient Decentralized Consensus Protocols. In: van Leeuwen, J. (ed.) WDAG 1987. LNCS, vol. 312, pp. 41–56. Springer, Heidelberg (1988)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Chandra, T., Hadzilacos, V., Toueg, S.: The Weakest Failure Detector for Solving Consensus. Journal of the ACM 43(4), 685–722 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Chandra, T.D., Toueg, S.: Unreliable Failure Detectors for Reliable Distributed Systems. Journal of the ACM 43(2), 225–267 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Chu, F.: Reducing Ω to \(\diamondsuit\) W. Information Processing Letters 76(6), 293–298 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Delporte-Gallet, C., Fauconnier, H., Guerraoui, R.: A Realistic Look at Failure Detectors. In: Proc. Int. Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN 2002), pp. 354–353 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Delporte-Gallet, C., Fauconnier, H., Guerraoui, R.: Failure Detection Lower Bounds on Registers and Consensus. In: Malkhi, D. (ed.) DISC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2508, pp. 237–251. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Delporte-Gallet, C., Fauconnier, H., Guerraoui, R.: Shared Memory vs Message Passing. Technical Report, IC/2003/77, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Delporte-Gallet, C., Fauconnier, H., Guerraoui, R., Hadzilacos, V., Kouznetzov, P., Toueg, S.: The Weakest Failure Detectors to Solve Certain Fundamental Problems in Distributed Computing. In: 23th ACM Int. Symp. on Principles of Distributed Computing, pp. 338–346 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fischer, M.J., Lynch, N., Paterson, M.S.: Impossibility of Distributed Consensus with One Faulty Process. Journal of the ACM 32(2), 374–382 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Friedman, R., Mostéfaoui, A., Raynal, M.: A Weakest Failure Detector-Based Asynchronous Consensus Protocol for f < n. Information Processing Letters 90(1), 39–46 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Guerraoui, R.: Non-Blocking Atomic Commit in Asynchronous Distributed Systems with Failure Detectors. Distributed Computing 15, 17–25 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guerraoui, R., Kouznetsov, P.: On the Weakest Failure Detector for Non-Blocking Atomic Commit. In: Proc. 2nd Int. IFIP Conf. on Theoretical Computer Science, pp. 461–473 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guerraoui, R., Raynal, M.: The Information Structure of Indulgent Consensus. IEEE Transactions on Computers 53(4), 453–466 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Keidar, I., Dolev, D.: Increasing the Resilience of Distributed and Replicated Database Systems. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 57(3), 309–324 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Lakshman, T.V., Agrawala, A.K.: Efficient Decentralized Consensus Protocols. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering SE12(5), 600–607 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lamport, L.: The Part-Time Parliament. ACM TOCS 16(2), 133–169 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lo, W.-K., Hadzilacos, V.: Using Failure Detectors to Solve Consensus in Asynchronous Shared-Memory Systems. In: Tel, G., Vitányi, P.M.B. (eds.) WDAG 1994. LNCS, vol. 857, pp. 280–295. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Mostéfaoui, A., Raynal, M.: Solving Consensus Using Chandra-Toueg’s Unreliable Failure Detectors: a General Quorum-Based Approach. In: Jayanti, P. (ed.) DISC 1999. LNCS, vol. 1693, pp. 49–63. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Mostéfaoui, A., Raynal, M.: Leader-Based Consensus. Parallel Processing Letters 11(1), 95–107 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Skeen, D.: Non-Blocking Commit Protocols. In: Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conference on Management of Data, pp. 133–142. ACM Press, New York (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thomas, R.H.: A Majority Consensus Approach to Concurrency Control for Multiple Copies Databases. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 4(2), 180–209 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Friedman, R., Mostefaoui, A., Raynal, M. (2005). Building and Using Quorums Despite any Number of Process of Crashes. In: Dal Cin, M., Kaâniche, M., Pataricza, A. (eds) Dependable Computing - EDCC 5. EDCC 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3463. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11408901_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11408901_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25723-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32019-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics