Abstract
This paper addresses the issue of qualitative reasoning in imprecise spatial domains. In particular, the uncertainty in the nature of the spatial relationships between objects in space is represented by a set of possibilities. The approach to spatial reasoning proposed here is carried out in three steps. First, a transformation is carried out on the disjunctive set of possible relationships to derive their corresponding set of spatial constraints. Reasoning formulae are developed to propagate the set of identified constraints and finally a transformation is carried out on the resulting constraints to map them back to the domain of spatial relations to identify the result of the spatial composition. Two general equations form the basis for the propagation of the spatial constraints. A major advantage of this method is that reasoning with incomplete knowledge can be done by direct application of the reasoning formulae on the spatial objects considered, and thus eliminates the need for utilising the inordinate number of composition tables which must be built for specific object types and topology. The method is applied on spatial objects of arbitrary complexity and in a finite definite number of steps controlled by the complexity needed in the representation of objects and the granularity of the spatial relations required.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
B. Bennett, A. Isli, and A. Cohn. When does a composition table provide a complete and tractable proof procedure for a relational constraint language, 1997.
S. Chen. Advances in Spatial Reasoning. Ablex, 1990.
A G Cohn and S M Hazarika. Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning: An overview. Fundamenta Informaticae, 46(1–2):1–29, 2001.
A.G. Cohn and A.C. Varzi. Modes of Connection: A Taxonomy of Qualitative Topological Relations. In Proceeding of the Internation Conference on Spatial Information Theory COSIT’99, volume LNCS 1329, pages 299–314. Springer Verlag, 1999.
M.J. Egenhofer and J.R. Herring. A Mathematical Framework for the Definition of Topological Relationships. In Proceedings of the 4th international Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, volume 2, pages 803–13, 1990.
B.A. El-Geresy and A.I. Abdelmoty. SPARQS: Automatic Rasoning in Qualitative Space. In Proc. of AI-2003, the Twenty-third SGAI Int. Conf. on Innovative Techniques and Applications of Artificial Intelligence, pages 243–254. Springer, 2003.
C. Freksa. Conceptual Neighborhood and its Role in Temporal and Spatial Reasoning. In Decision Support Systems and Qualitative Reasoning, pages 181–187, 1991.
C. Freksa. Temporal Reasoning based on Semi-Intervals. Artificial Intelligence, 54:199–227, 1992.
M.F. Goodchild and S. Gopal, editors. Accuracy of Spatial Databases. Taylor & Francis, London, 1989.
D. Hernandez. Qualitative Representation of Spatial Knowledge, volume 804. Springer Verlag, 1994.
D. Randell and M. Wikowski. Building Large Composition Tables via Axiomatic Theories. In Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference (KR-2002), pages 26–35. AAAI Press, 2002.
M.F. Worboys and E. Clementini. Integration of imperfect spatial information. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 12:61–80, 2001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
El-Geresy, B.A., Abdelmoty, A.I. (2005). Imprecise Qualitative Spatial Reasoning. In: Bramer, M., Coenen, F., Allen, T. (eds) Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXI. SGAI 2004. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-102-4_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-102-4_22
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-907-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-102-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)