乐胖代购免代理版

general

source: openssl (main)
version: 3.4.1-1
maintainer: Debian OpenSSL Team (archive) (DMD)
uploaders: Kurt Roeckx [DMD] – Christoph Martin [DMD] – Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [DMD]
arch: all any
std-ver: 4.6.2
VCS: Git (Browse, QA)

versions [more versions can be listed by madison] [old versions available from snapshot.debian.org]

[pool directory]

o-o-stable: 1.1.1n-0+deb10u3
o-o-sec: 1.1.1n-0+deb10u6
oldstable: 1.1.1w-0+deb11u1
old-sec: 1.1.1w-0+deb11u2
stable: 3.0.15-1~deb12u1
stable-sec: 3.0.14-1~deb12u2
testing: 3.4.0-2
unstable: 3.4.1-1

versioned links

1.1.1n-0+deb10u3: [.dsc, use dget on this link to retrieve source package] [changelog] [copyright] [rules] [control]
1.1.1n-0+deb10u6: [.dsc, use dget on this link to retrieve source package] [changelog] [copyright] [rules] [control]
1.1.1w-0+deb11u1: [.dsc, use dget on this link to retrieve source package] [changelog] [copyright] [rules] [control]
1.1.1w-0+deb11u2: [.dsc, use dget on this link to retrieve source package] [changelog] [copyright] [rules] [control]
3.0.14-1~deb12u2: [.dsc, use dget on this link to retrieve source package] [changelog] [copyright] [rules] [control]
3.0.15-1~deb12u1: [.dsc, use dget on this link to retrieve source package] [changelog] [copyright] [rules] [control]
3.4.0-2: [.dsc, use dget on this link to retrieve source package] [changelog] [copyright] [rules] [control]
3.4.1-1: [.dsc, use dget on this link to retrieve source package] [changelog] [copyright] [rules] [control]

binaries

libcrypto3-udeb
libssl-dev
libssl-doc (1 bugs: 0, 0, 1, 0)
libssl3-udeb
libssl3t64 (1 bugs: 0, 1, 0, 0)
openssl (51 bugs: 0, 29, 22, 0)
openssl-provider-fips (1 bugs: 0, 1, 0, 0)
openssl-provider-legacy

action needed

The VCS repository is not up to date, push the missing commits. high

vcswatch reports that the current version of the package is not in its VCS.
Either you need to push your commits and/or your tags, or the information about the package's VCS are out of date. A common cause of the latter issue when using the Git VCS is not specifying the correct branch when the packaging is not in the default one (remote HEAD branch), which is usually "master" but can be modified in salsa.debian.org in the project's general settings with the "Default Branch" field). Alternatively the Vcs-Git field in debian/control can contain a "-b <branch-name>" suffix to indicate what branch is used for the Debian packaging.

Created: 2024-08-20 Last update: 2025-02-17 15:02

2 security issues in trixie high

There are 2 open security issues in trixie.

2 important issues:

CVE-2024-12797: Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate a server may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because handshakes don't abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode is set. Impact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may be vulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is not detected by clients. RPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers. The issue only arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the server, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate chain. The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to fail when the server's RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys, by setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER. Clients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw public key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those that do, and take appropriate action, are not affected. This issue was introduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2. The FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.
CVE-2024-13176: Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow recovering the private key exists in the ECDSA signature computation. Impact summary: A timing side-channel in ECDSA signature computations could allow recovering the private key by an attacker. However, measuring the timing would require either local access to the signing application or a very fast network connection with low latency. There is a timing signal of around 300 nanoseconds when the top word of the inverted ECDSA nonce value is zero. This can happen with significant probability only for some of the supported elliptic curves. In particular the NIST P-521 curve is affected. To be able to measure this leak, the attacker process must either be located in the same physical computer or must have a very fast network connection with low latency. For that reason the severity of this vulnerability is Low.

Created: 2025-01-20 Last update: 2025-02-12 18:00

5 security issues in buster high

There are 5 open security issues in buster.

1 important issue:

CVE-2024-5535: Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an empty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to be sent to the peer. Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling application. The OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS applications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN (Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and is deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more widely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of protocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns the first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the client list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the first item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap between the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is called with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and returns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports that there was no overlap in the lists). This function is typically called from a server side application callback for ALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list of protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in length. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the SSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list supplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the application will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has accidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has accidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len parameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a "no overlap" response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it will be vulnerable to this problem. In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select a protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol in the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. However if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a client_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the application uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of confidentiality will occur. This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most likely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not widely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error. Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active exploitation unlikely. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they become available.

4 issues postponed or untriaged:

CVE-2023-5678: (postponed; to be fixed through a stable update) Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking excessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to generate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications that use DH_check_pub_key(), DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. While DH_check() performs all the necessary checks (as of CVE-2023-3817), DH_check_pub_key() doesn't make any of these checks, and is therefore vulnerable for excessively large P and Q parameters. Likewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an excessively large P, it doesn't check for an excessively large Q. An application that calls DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. DH_generate_key() and DH_check_pub_key() are also called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_pub_key_ex(), EVP_PKEY_public_check(), and EVP_PKEY_generate(). Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey command line application when using the "-pubcheck" option, as well as the OpenSSL genpkey command line application. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.
CVE-2024-0727: (postponed; to be fixed through a stable update) Issue summary: Processing a maliciously formatted PKCS12 file may lead OpenSSL to crash leading to a potential Denial of Service attack Impact summary: Applications loading files in the PKCS12 format from untrusted sources might terminate abruptly. A file in PKCS12 format can contain certificates and keys and may come from an untrusted source. The PKCS12 specification allows certain fields to be NULL, but OpenSSL does not correctly check for this case. This can lead to a NULL pointer dereference that results in OpenSSL crashing. If an application processes PKCS12 files from an untrusted source using the OpenSSL APIs then that application will be vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL APIs that are vulnerable to this are: PKCS12_parse(), PKCS12_unpack_p7data(), PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata(), PKCS12_unpack_authsafes() and PKCS12_newpass(). We have also fixed a similar issue in SMIME_write_PKCS7(). However since this function is related to writing data we do not consider it security significant. The FIPS modules in 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.
CVE-2024-2511: (postponed; to be fixed through a stable update) Issue summary: Some non-default TLS server configurations can cause unbounded memory growth when processing TLSv1.3 sessions Impact summary: An attacker may exploit certain server configurations to trigger unbounded memory growth that would lead to a Denial of Service This problem can occur in TLSv1.3 if the non-default SSL_OP_NO_TICKET option is being used (but not if early_data support is also configured and the default anti-replay protection is in use). In this case, under certain conditions, the session cache can get into an incorrect state and it will fail to flush properly as it fills. The session cache will continue to grow in an unbounded manner. A malicious client could deliberately create the scenario for this failure to force a Denial of Service. It may also happen by accident in normal operation. This issue only affects TLS servers supporting TLSv1.3. It does not affect TLS clients. The FIPS modules in 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is also not affected by this issue.
CVE-2024-4741: (postponed; to be fixed through a stable update)

Created: 2024-06-27 Last update: 2024-06-29 19:18

1 bug tagged patch in the BTS normal

The BTS contains patches fixing 1 bug, consider including or untagging them.

Created: 2025-01-06 Last update: 2025-02-17 15:00

lintian reports 7 warnings normal

Lintian reports 7 warnings about this package. You should make the package lintian clean getting rid of them.

Created: 2025-01-07 Last update: 2025-01-07 03:31

RFH: The maintainer is looking for help with this package. normal

The current maintainer is looking for someone who can help with the maintenance of this package. If you are interested in this package, please consider helping out. One way you can help is offer to be a co-maintainer or triage bugs in the BTS. Please see bug number #332498 for more information.

Created: 2017-12-02 Last update: 2017-12-02 00:26

1 low-priority security issue in bookworm low

There is 1 open security issue in bookworm.

1 issue left for the package maintainer to handle:

CVE-2024-13176: (needs triaging) Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow recovering the private key exists in the ECDSA signature computation. Impact summary: A timing side-channel in ECDSA signature computations could allow recovering the private key by an attacker. However, measuring the timing would require either local access to the signing application or a very fast network connection with low latency. There is a timing signal of around 300 nanoseconds when the top word of the inverted ECDSA nonce value is zero. This can happen with significant probability only for some of the supported elliptic curves. In particular the NIST P-521 curve is affected. To be able to measure this leak, the attacker process must either be located in the same physical computer or must have a very fast network connection with low latency. For that reason the severity of this vulnerability is Low.

You can find information about how to handle this issue in the security team's documentation.

Created: 2025-01-20 Last update: 2025-02-12 18:00

debian/patches: 8 patches to forward upstream low

Among the 8 debian patches available in version 3.4.1-1 of the package, we noticed the following issues:

8 patches where the metadata indicates that the patch has not yet been forwarded upstream. You should either forward the patch upstream or update the metadata to document its real status.

Created: 2023-02-26 Last update: 2025-02-12 10:30

Build log checks report 2 warnings low

Build log checks report 2 warnings

Created: 2021-01-18 Last update: 2022-05-21 09:05

Standards version of the package is outdated. wishlist

The package should be updated to follow the last version of Debian Policy (Standards-Version 4.7.0 instead of 4.6.2).

Created: 2024-04-07 Last update: 2025-02-12 06:33

testing migrations

excuses:
- Migration status for openssl (3.4.0-2 to 3.4.1-1): BLOCKED: Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regression
- Issues preventing migration:
- ∙ ∙ autopkgtest for libnet-ssleay-perl/1.94-2: amd64: Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻), arm64: Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻), armel: Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻), armhf: Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻), i386: Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻), ppc64el: Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻), riscv64: Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻), s390x: Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻)
- ∙ ∙ autopkgtest for openssl/3.4.1-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armel: Pass, armhf: Pass, i386: Pass, ppc64el: Pass, riscv64: Pass, s390x: Pass
- Additional info:
- ∙ ∙ Updating openssl will fix bugs in testing: #1095765
- ∙ ∙ Piuparts tested OK - https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/o/openssl.html
- ∙ ∙ Reproducible on amd64 - info ♻
- ∙ ∙ Reproducible on arm64 - info ♻
- ∙ ∙ Reproducible on armhf - info ♻
- ∙ ∙ Reproducible on i386 - info ♻
- ∙ ∙ 5 days old (needed 5 days)
- Not considered

news

[rss feed]

[2025-02-11] Accepted openssl 3.4.1-1 (source) into unstable (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
[2025-01-16] openssl 3.4.0-2 MIGRATED to testing (Debian testing watch)
[2025-01-06] Accepted openssl 3.4.0-2 (source) into unstable (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
[2024-11-03] Accepted openssl 1.1.1w-0+deb11u2 (source) into oldstable-security (Sean Whitton)
[2024-11-02] openssl 3.3.2-2 MIGRATED to testing (Debian testing watch)
[2024-10-31] Accepted openssl 3.0.15-1~deb12u1 (source) into proposed-updates (Debian FTP Masters) (signed by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
[2024-10-31] Accepted openssl 1.1.1n-0+deb11u6 (source) into oldstable-security (Sean Whitton)
[2024-10-27] Accepted openssl 3.3.2-2 (source) into unstable (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
[2024-10-23] Accepted openssl 3.4.0-1 (source) into experimental (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
[2024-10-13] Accepted openssl 3.4.0~~beta1-2 (source) into experimental (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
[2024-10-07] Accepted openssl 3.4.0~~beta1-1 (source) into experimental (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
[2024-09-09] openssl 3.3.2-1 MIGRATED to testing (Debian testing watch)
[2024-09-03] Accepted openssl 3.0.14-1~deb12u2 (source) into proposed-updates (Debian FTP Masters) (signed by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
[2024-09-03] Accepted openssl 3.3.2-1 (source) into unstable (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
[2024-09-03] Accepted openssl 3.0.14-1~deb12u2 (source) into stable-security (Debian FTP Masters) (signed by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
[2024-08-27] openssl 3.3.1-7 MIGRATED to testing (Debian testing watch)
[2024-08-22] Accepted openssl 3.0.14-1~deb12u1 (source) into proposed-updates (Debian FTP Masters) (signed by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
[2024-08-19] Accepted openssl 3.3.1-7 (source) into unstable (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
[2024-08-14] Accepted openssl 3.0.13-1~deb12u2 (source) into proposed-updates (Debian FTP Masters) (signed by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
[2024-08-13] Accepted openssl 3.3.1-6 (source) into unstable (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
[2024-08-09] Accepted openssl 3.3.1-5 (source amd64 all) into experimental (Debian FTP Masters) (signed by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
[2024-08-03] Accepted openssl 3.3.1-2 (source) into unstable (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
[2024-06-26] openssl 3.2.2-1 MIGRATED to testing (Debian testing watch)
[2024-06-04] Accepted openssl 3.3.1-1 (source) into experimental (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
[2024-06-04] Accepted openssl 3.2.2-1 (source) into unstable (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
[2024-04-25] openssl 3.2.1-3 MIGRATED to testing (Debian testing watch)
[2024-04-11] Accepted openssl 3.3.0-1 (source) into experimental (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
[2024-04-05] Accepted openssl 3.3.0~beta1-1 (source) into experimental (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
[2024-04-04] Accepted openssl 3.2.1-3 (source) into unstable (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
[2024-03-25] Accepted openssl 3.0.13-1~deb12u1 (source) into proposed-updates (Debian FTP Masters) (signed by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)

bugs [bug history graph]

all: 58
RC: 0
I&N: 34
M&W: 24
F&P: 0
patch: 1

links

homepage
lintian (0, 7)
buildd: logs, checks, reproducibility, cross
popcon
browse source code
edit tags
other distros
security tracker
screenshots
debian patches
debci

ubuntu

[Information about Ubuntu for Debian Developers]

version: 3.4.0-1ubuntu2
27 bugs (2 patches)
patches for 3.4.0-1ubuntu2