Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
   • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
   • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
   • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
   • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
   • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:

   {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/(name of page to be deleted)}}

4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review

• The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
• Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
• Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
• Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
• New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
• Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
• Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete keep".
• If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
• Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
• Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

• All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Ramkripalyadavg

Ramkripalyadavg (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Only a few references in the article are independent, not very notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 18:30, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nom, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 21:04, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:30, 30 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

City of federal subject significance

City of federal subject significance (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI-Generated content, How users like this Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 13:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:28, 30 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kherai Puja

Kherai Puja (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article doesn't have any sources and Unreferenced. How Users Created Their New Articles Like this without references. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 11:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep as notable topic - See en:Kherai, Obviously meets GNG. --–Davey2010^Talk 11:45, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

   Comment: @Davey2010, I see Kherai Puja in English it met but Simple English just Unreferenced Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 12:45, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

  Being unsourced isn't a reason to nominate an article for deletion especially if the subject is at the English Wikipedia, Also you're supposed to do a WP:BEFORE search before nominating which I'm assuming you've not done, Many thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 13:25, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

  Thank you, Happy editing! Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 13:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:13, 30 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Salman Malik

Salman Malik (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

DIVINE has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: It appears that the individual does not meet the WP:GNG criteria for notability. They have completed one comedy tour, which is mentioned in Arab News, but this alone is not enough to establish notability. DIVINE (talk) 09:13, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete One good source isn't enough to show that WP:NBIO is met, right now Malik doesn't meet notability requirements. Ravensfire (talk) 05:21, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:13, 29 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Carrier-sense multiple access with collision avoidance

Carrier-sense multiple access with collision avoidance (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI/LLM Generated Article, How users created their new articles like this. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 03:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• This is a page with a long history. There are versions of this page before the most recent, that we can revert to (look at this version: here). So no need for deletion.--Eptalon (talk) 04:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Eptalon, Whoops i didn't look at history Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 04:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment: I have reverted back to the last known good version fr33kman 10:24, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep since history has been reverted. Ternera (talk) 21:53, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 03:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Koreapas

Koreapas (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable homepage to a uni, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG –Davey2010^Talk 22:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:56, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Alliebrack National School

Alliebrack National School (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NSCHOOL and GNG –Davey2010^Talk 22:53, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Non-Notable Ireland's School, How users created their new articles about school like this. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 07:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

African–American Indigenous solidarity

African–American Indigenous solidarity (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fr33kman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nonsense term that doesn't exist. Not QD-able fr33kman 22:22, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Sources say it does. Sources including entire books dedicated to the subject. Invasive Spices (talk) 22:27, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

  I've read the sources and can find the phrase no where in them or on Google. fr33kman 10:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

• I considered several synonyms and neighbor–synonyms before creating it,

• African–American Indigenous intersectionality
• Afro–Indigenous intersectionality (USA)
• Afro–Indigenous solidarity (USA)
• Black–Indigenous intersectionality (USA)
• Black–Indigenous solidarity (USA)
• Afro–American Indigenous solidarity
• Afro–American Indigenous intersectionality

but I prefered this option. The most common is Black–Indigenous intersectionality but that violates and so should be Black–Indigenous intersectionality (USA). I don't like it but perhaps we should ignore my aesthetic preferences and use Black–Indigenous intersectionality (USA). Invasive Spices (talk) 22:05, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

• As the source I've just added http://nativephilanthropy.org/blog/2022/02/01/intersectional-indigenous-identities-afro-indigenous-and-black-indigenous-peoples points out, the terms are not always obvious to everyone. Invasive Spices (talk)

This request is due to close on 22:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Amteka

Amteka (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable village, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG –Davey2010^Talk 18:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Per nominator. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 19:07, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep I searched on Google Books for "Amteka" "chirang" and I found a lot of results, so probably people have written about this place. This article is actually better than most of the stubs about villages here, because it gives some information. Oholiba (talk) 20:11, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

  A lot of results means nothing, from what I can gather these books are 2 bit mentions and some books don't appear to be related to this village at all, If you could provide books from that list that demonstrate notability that would be fantastic, Many Thanks –Davey2010^Talk 20:34, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

List of Garja gods

List of Garja gods (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable subject, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG –Davey2010^Talk 18:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Per nominator. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 01:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:14, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Bad (Bodo culture)

Bad (Bodo culture) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable culture, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails DICDEF and GNG –Davey2010^Talk 18:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep: In addition to the cited source, I also found this described in a book online by B.C. Basumatary. There may also be other sources which can't be found online. As an anthropological topic, which is likely the subject of research, I believe we should allow an article about this. (Unless the article seemed to plagiarism or POV-pushing, which this doesn't seem to be.) Oholiba (talk) 20:08, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

  The cited source just gives definitions, it doesn't demonstrate any notability. There may be sources offline however on the other hand there may be none at all..., "likely the subject of research" - says who?,

  Without being disrespectful your !vote is pretty much clutching at straws. You've not offered any substantial or indepth sources that demonstrate any notability, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 21:43, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

  "Demonstrating notability" is an indeterminate concept here. It makes sense for a person, movie, or company, but what does it mean to say that a cultural belief demonstrates notability. It's covered in sources, which is enough for Wikipedia. WP:GNG Oholiba (talk) 22:00, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

  Well I mean being important enough to have an article by having coverage in a number of independent reliable sources, One source doesn't make this pass GNG unfortunately, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 22:15, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:10, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Hapsa Hatarnai

Hapsa Hatarnai (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable ceremony, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG –Davey2010^Talk 18:08, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep It's found in many search results in Google Books. It's a notable topic, and probably has been studied by researchers. Oholiba (talk) 20:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

  This tells you a snippet of what it is, this and this appear to be copypastes from somewhere (or it's a huge coincidence they've included this and other ceremonies in the exact same order), this is fine, The rest of the books don't appear to even mention Hapsa Hatarnai. I'm still not seeing any evidence of any notability here, The books I've mentioned just confirms it exists but there's nothing indepth or substantial, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 21:53, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:08, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Practical High School

Practical High School (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NSCHOOL and GNG –Davey2010^Talk 17:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete can't find any reliable sources that show notability fr33kman 18:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete non-notable school, probably there so somebody can point at it and say "Hey look, it's our school on Wikipedia!".- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 14:14, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Gurudev Kalicharan Brahma Academy

Gurudev Kalicharan Brahma Academy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NSCHOOL and GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 17:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete can't find any reliable sources for it. fr33kman 10:41, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Multirate signal processing

Multirate signal processing (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced, LLM-generated article. Ternera (talk) 17:32, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

TXEX Exchange

TXEX Exchange (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Two references have nothing to do with the subject and TrustPilot suggests it's a scam website: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/txex.pro Ternera (talk) 15:15, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete scam site fr33kman 18:21, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete as scam site. –Davey2010^Talk 20:57, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:15, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mohammad Zaid Khan

Mohammad Zaid Khan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Full of paid/sponsored articles used as sources, highly questionable "award" (youngest entrepreneur of Uttarakhand at age 22? I highly doubt that). Even the one source left after my trimming is more of a blog post from a company than a good source. Nothing here to show WP:NBIO is met. Ravensfire (talk) 13:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nominator Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 13:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete fails WP:GNG. Ternera (talk) 14:54, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Pixel 9

Pixel 9 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced Mobile Phone Article, Underdeveloped Article Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 13:36, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep Article has a reference, and even if it's short, a stub template can be placed. Also please know that [an] Unreferenced [article] and an Underdeveloped Article are not reasons to delete an article. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 13:39, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Asteralee, Whoops i see it wrong Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 13:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep just because an article is a stub does not mean it should be deleted. Ternera (talk) 14:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

  I agreed you, Keep i Improved Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 07:20, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

• keep clearly notable subject. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep - Makes no sense to me why you'd nominate an article for deletion on the basis that it's Unreferenced Mobile Phone Article, Underdeveloped Article and then you proceed to reference and develop it?!, Nonetheless thanks for sourcing/expanding it, Keep per improvements made. –Davey2010^Talk 20:55, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ghostfuckers

Ghostfuckers (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable as a standalone episode. We don't have a List of Helluva Boss episodes that this article can redirect to. I don't really see the point of redirecting this article to Helluva Boss. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 11:07, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete not notable on its own. fr33kman 10:36, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete per nom and Freekman, Even if the episode list existed I still would've gone with delete, Should be deleted at enwiki too. –Davey2010^Talk 20:51, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete The title also contains a bad word in it and the whole page is like nonsense. thetree284 (talk) 20:55, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:07, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

SYLBEATZ

SYLBEATZ (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Tanbiruzzaman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No significant coverage, doesn’t pass WP:GNG, Page creator blocked in enwiki for sock. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 10:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 10:28, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Anti-aliasing filter

Anti-aliasing filter (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

FusionSub has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:NOT. Essay and AI generated. - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:53, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete It is looking like an AI content, also it is a WP:NOT, it should delete. - Centella Gold • (Talk) 21 November 2024
•  Delete content appears to be LLM-generated spam. Ternera (talk) 14:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Edward Harte

Edward Harte (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. No reliable sources in the article and overall reads very promotional of the subject (take Edward worked hard on improving his sightreading. As a result, Edward's sightreading is surprisingly sharp as an example). No reliable and significant sources elsewhere. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 02:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 02:45, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Oceanic International Yoga School Goa (2nd nomination)

Oceanic International Yoga School Goa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Sources in the article are all SELFPUBLISHED, Fails NCORP and GNG, (Just noting NSCHOOL would be irrelevant as it's a yoga place not a high school)

Article was previously deleted per G11 and it was also A4'd at Yoga International School Goa, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 15:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Nom in previous RFD withdrew and I had closed it without looking at the article. –Davey2010^Talk 15:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete clear UPE advertising. Before trimming, article had a lot of sources that didn't mention the company and a lot of promotional fluff. Afterwards, it's primary sources and nothing to show that NCORP is met here. Ravensfire (talk) 15:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete No Notability and written as promotional --Ksy 15:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete entirely promotional. Sources are self-serving fr33kman 16:13, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete fails WP:GNG. Ternera (talk) 17:32, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:42, 27 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Category:Thomas and Friends movies

Category:Thomas and Friends movies (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Only one article. content should be moved to Category:Thomas and Friends QuantumFoam66 (talk) 23:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep - Created a redirect which has added another entry to the category, Someone will create a Thomas and friends movie soon enough. –Davey2010^Talk 20:48, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:44, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ryan T. White

Ryan T. White (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. BRP ^ever 20:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Per nominator. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 22:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Not Notable at all --Ksy 16:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Not notable - sources are garbage, two different obituaries for different people were used as sources for socalled awards. No. Ravensfire (talk) 16:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:27, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Raja Usmani

Raja Usmani (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. BRP ^ever 20:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete clear promotional article with fake awards, paid articles as sources and nothing to support notability. Ravensfire (talk) 16:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:26, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Abdulwahab Office

Abdulwahab Office (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Promotional. BRP ^ever 20:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Not Notable Delete as per Nominator--Ksy 17:06, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:25, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Manigandan Manjunathan

Manigandan Manjunathan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: There are Guinness World Record for almost everything these days. This alone can not make the page notable. BRP ^ever 20:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:16, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Deer Jade

Deer Jade (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Not notable. BRP ^ever 20:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Did a Quick research and could not find any notable sources for the subject --Ksy 17:13, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:10, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Amit Chakraborty

Amit Chakraborty (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable person, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, I believe the sources that are on a Amit Chakraborty is a completely different person, Fails NPERSON and GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 19:59, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Sources are bio blurbs on connected websites or press-releases. No indepenent reliable source with significant coverage about Chakraborty. Ravensfire (talk) 21:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kislay Panday

Kislay Panday (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The source look unreliable and quite promotional. The article on times of India looks like it's there for his promotion and nothing else. Fails notability criteria. BRP ^ever 19:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete This was pretty obviously created as a promotional article by a paid editor. Highly promotional in tone, full of paid/sponsored articles, unsourced/fake awards and a lot of unsupported content. From the sources, there's a few less than complimentary things that could be added to the article. I've removed the obviously bad sources but question some of the rest. The overall tone of this is just terrible. I don't think this is worth saving, the notability is questionable. Combine everything and I'm in favor of deleting. Ravensfire (talk) 04:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:58, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Chirag Bhandari

Chirag Bhandari (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable person, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NPERSON and GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 19:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 19:58, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Apt Pay

Apt Pay (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable company, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NCORP and GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 19:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Sources are a mix of AI generated and paid/sponsored articles, with maybe one iffy-to-good source hiding in there. Not enough to show NCORP is met. Ravensfire (talk) 14:30, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Fails WP:GNG. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 14:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
• delete non-notable.Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:56, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sahil Luthra

Sahil Luthra (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable person, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NPERSON and GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 19:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Sources lack significant in depth coverage of the person. Article was over-the-top promotional in tone, suggesting there's some UPE here. Not enough to show they are notable. Ravensfire (talk) 04:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:56, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Abdul Wahab Al Maimani

Abdul Wahab Al Maimani (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable person, Found [1] and [2] and that's it, No evidence of any notability, Fials NPERSON and GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 19:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Delete as per Nom, Not at all Notable subject.—This unsigned comment was added by Kuskrey (talk • changes) 17:17, November 20, 2024 (UTC) (UTC)
•  Delete Several paid/sponsored articles, not enough good sources to show notability. Ravensfire (talk) 16:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Non-Notable Omani People, How users created new article like this Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 03:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:55, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

R. Edward Grant

R. Edward Grant (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional article with no valid sources that would meet WP:NBIO. I see four sources in this article and at least two of them don't even mention this person. Depextual (talk) 17:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Obit that doesn't match the DOB in the article? And the sources get worse from there. Delete this promotional garbage. Ravensfire (talk) 21:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:03, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Harrison Gwinnett

Harrison Gwinnett (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional article. No reliable sources that would meet WP:NBIO. In fact, all the sources are either promotional, or don't mention the subject at all. Depextual (talk) 16:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Sources don't mention this person or aren't reliable. This is clearly a promotional article created by someone paid to create it who just made up sources as needed. Ravensfire (talk) 21:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Role of Fourier transform in quantum mechanics

Role of Fourier transform in quantum mechanics (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not simple, not encyclopedic, reads like it was generated using an LLM. I'm not sure where to begin merging this with an existing article. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 12:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• QD - for any of the reasons above. 2001:2020:321:C7DB:38C5:F86B:7404:2754 (talk) 16:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:11, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Chirag Gajera

Chirag Gajera (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The nominator's reason for doing this is: I do not see this person's name in any of the sources. Non-notable person and promotional article. Depextual (talk) 19:54, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Sources that don't mention the person or have at best a passing mention, award list with no sources that actually support it - this is promotional UPE. Ravensfire (talk) 21:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:54, 25 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Vedic Legal

Vedic Legal (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional article, but QD was declined. All of these references are either some kind of press release or otherwise promotional, so they don't qualify for WP:NORG. Depextual (talk) 19:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Comment: I wouldn't say the QD was declined. The IP who removed the QD template didn't give a reason, and I think they just didn't want the page deleted. That's not the same as declining a QD. A decline is an admin saying the reason given isn't valid. I'll leave it for another admin to QD if they want to. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

  I am also agree with Auntof6 because QD removed by an IP user so RFD is not required QD is the better option. Symonds Gerother (talk) 19:46, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete, but I'd support QD as G11, this is over-the-top promotional with paid/sponsored articles, promotional tone and some creative writing. Ravensfire (talk) 18:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Parvez Sultan Rupani

Parvez Sultan Rupani (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional article, QD was declined. The sources are all promotional, and I don't believe they qualify for notability according to WP:NBIO. Depextual (talk) 19:09, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep The article on Parvez Sultan Rupani is supported by significant coverage from independent sources, as evidenced by the references provided. Additionally, the content does not contain any promotional language, ensuring a neutral and factual representation of his achievements and career.--Symonds Gerother (talk) 19:30, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Too many of these sources are sponsored articles, not reliable sources (and basically spam/marketing/SEO sites) or don't support the information where used. One "award" is left that is sourced, but nothing I can see about it is actually notable. Promotional article that doesn't support notability. Ravensfire (talk) 21:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete poorly sourced, no RS fr33kman 22:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Promotional sources. Non-notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 22:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:09, 25 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

NBC November 24, 2003 Program Lineup

NBC November 24, 2003 Program Lineup (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Like a directory, not relevant for Wikipedia. Depextual (talk) 18:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete un-encyclopedic and unreferenced article, how they created their new articles like this, I found it NBC Daily list it's not allowed in Wikipedia article guidelines because readers looking a article and found it's un-encyclopedic Fails Wikipedia Guidelines Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 18:43, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete un-encyclopedic program listing.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 09:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete as we're not a TV guide. –Davey2010^Talk 20:19, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:27, 25 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

STARZ! NOVEMBER 04, 2000 LINEUP

STARZ! NOVEMBER 04, 2000 LINEUP (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

FusionSub has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Another one of these TV listing type pages, not encyclopedic and cant be turned into anything of encyclopedic value - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Quick Delete un-encyclopedic and no references article, daily list is not allowed in Wikipedia Guidelines because readers will looking is not found information how they created new article like this Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 12:28, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

  Note:There is no QD criteria for un-encyclopedic articles or unreferenced articles.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 14:06, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

  I understood, i think daily list Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 18:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete as we're not a TV guide. –Davey2010^Talk 20:19, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:08, 25 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Grant Palmer

Grant Palmer (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Absolutiva has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable actor it fails WP:GNG. Absolutiva (talk) 08:59, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Comment: @Absolutiva Is your RFD Requests that you created? I voted  Delete because Non Notable Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 09:50, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Oludotun Akinbobola

Oludotun Akinbobola (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Lee Vilenski has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable businessman. Fails WP:GNG Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Unreferenced Article how IP Created Their new article like this, It's article with Un-encyclopedic and No References Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 13:43, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Per nominator. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 13:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete no significant coverage fr33kman 13:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete as no significant coverage, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 20:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Anglican Adam Preaching Society

Anglican Adam Preaching Society (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-independent sources. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 02:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep - Because several independent sources have already been added by me. 102.89.22.201 (talk) 12:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Alone (Marshmello song)

Alone (Marshmello song) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Un-encyclopedic tone, non-notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 23:45, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Comment: I spent 20 minutes on the page, please do not delete it. I can fix it, just tell me what I need to change. 2601:80:C67F:73D0:1593:D13B:CCF2:EB11 (talk) 23:48, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Not Notable Music Article, Unencyclopedic tone, How Users Created Their New Article like this! Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 03:35, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Non- Notable --Ksy 20:33, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
• Redirect per W:WP:TNT. As this musician has other notable song, it's possible this one is too. However, the quality is far too bad, and we would be better off starting from scratch if references can be found. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:09, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
• Either redirect to Marshmello or delete. Definitely a notable song, but the presentation here is not the best.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 13:32, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep as replaced the entire article, expanded and cited too –Davey2010^Talk 19:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:45, 22 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Paolo Petrocelli

Paolo Petrocelli (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ethn23 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: It's probably a spam interwiki. Deleted also on itwiki and enwiki. This page is exactly the page that was cancelled on enwiki. Read also, if you want, this RdF of itwiki. Ethn23 (talk) 14:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep. No valid reason to remove the article. The article includes numerous cited sources that adhere to Simple Wiki's guidelines:

WP:GNG, if a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be notable

WP:PEOPLE, a person can be notable if they have been written about in many published secondary sources. These must be reliable, independent of each other, and independent of the subject. 46.36.115.202 (talk) 18:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Further comment. Just because it was removed from another wiki, cross-wiki doesn't mean it should be removed here, especially when these are two different articles (with different text and used sources). See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. 46.36.115.202 (talk) 18:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:53, 22 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Archives

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Archives (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Hi, we currently have Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/archives and this template. This one is a bit hard to maintain, while the other one is much easier. I think we can simply use Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/archives on the archive page for navigation. If deleted, I think it will be best if we move the the other list of archive to this title. BRP ^ever 14:11, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep because everything links to it[3] but even if nothing linked to it I'd still go with keep as it was created in 21 January 2008 so imho should be marked as historical, Imho mot really causing any harm existing and it's not hosting TB of data so yeah keep, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 19:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:11, 22 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sigma male

Sigma male (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 13:43, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Neutral - En-wiki has an article.--Merging into other article, is an idea.--'Nuke' is also an idea, so that one does not have to waste time, evaluating the sources. (Our sources seem to 'not have a good ring' , for now.) 2001:2020:32B:F22A:BC9D:9EA2:D8C1:9CBA (talk) 14:15, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

  A couple of questions:

  • What is the significance of enwiki having an article?
  • What article do you think this could be merged to?

  -- Auntof6 (talk) 18:27, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

  • I added a 'new, first sentence/line', in the article.--I expect to 'sink in', cirka zero more 'effort' into the article (or the Delete discussion).--For now, I am neutral if the article has got to go.--Will the article get 'enough improvements' before this discussion is over? Not likely.--If this post is regarded as somewhat helpful, then fine. 2001:2020:301:DC0D:355B:BD48:51CF:E14A (talk) 22:35, 13 November 2024 (UTC) /2001:2020:32B:F22A:BC9D:9EA2:D8C1:9CBA

•  Comment: - "To become a sigma male you need to help 10 people in a maximum of 1 hour", the article says.--Time to have a closer look at 'the [[Nuclear football]'/ Nuclear Football? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:2020:32B:F22A:BC9D:9EA2:D8C1:9CBA (talk • contribs)
•  Delete. Notable but not encyclopedic in its current form.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 22:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep I have changed the article. I did not have the motivation to continue adding more information so if others would like to contribute that is greatly appreciated. I vote keep due to its rise and use within today's culture. – Angerxiety^! 14:35, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep - I've expanded and cited the article, It's not as simple as I would like but it's a start, In my humble opinion as it has its little section on enwiki it should have an article here too (I can't say "it should have its own section" because Alpha and beta male doesn't exist here) - I appreciate not everyone shares the same enwiki views but that's my view. Anyway keep as imho notable subject. –Davey2010^Talk 19:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kamaria

Kamaria (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I wanted to improve this article but there are barely any reliable source with information that can fix or grow this page. I'd say this needs to be redirected to Yadav due to clear lack of general information. The content not written with NPOV. BRP ^ever 15:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep:@BRPever No sir/ma’am there is no need for the deletion of this page. All the sources I’ve put in are reliable and I’ve also cross checked all the sources that I’ve put in the article, on ground level. They are all a 110% correct. Also the content is written with NPOV as all the things I’ve written is either facts(with backed sources) or an assumption which is almost close to correct. Nlkyair012 (talk) 16:23, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment: This article was moved to Kamariya Ahir (Yadav), with a redirect left behind. @Nlkyair012: Please do not move articles when there is an active RfD. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:30, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

  Case was due to close on 16 nov 2024 i thought it was deleted already im sorry Nlkyair012 (talk) 06:55, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:55, 16 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:1925-26 NHL season by team

Template:1925-26 NHL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominating a group of navigation templates that each have either zero or only one relevant blue link. With so few relevant links, a navbox can't do its job of navigating between pages.

Templates included in this request:

• Template:1925-26 NHL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:2000 NFL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:2002 NFL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:2004 NFL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:2006 NFL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:2010 NFL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:2015 NFL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:2016 NFL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:NCAA football season navbox (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:NFL team season lists (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Notes to closing admin:

• None of these templates appear to have any subpages.
• All of these templates are transcluded on at least one page.

-- Auntof6 (talk) 05:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nom Yelromcc (talk) 16:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
• Delete the NHL and NCAA ones but Keep the NFL ones as there are 5 blue links on all of them. Remember the headers are valid navigation targets also in a navbox. That being said I feel like we have had discussions in the past that said as long as we have one bluelink in a navbox they are good to go. I can't be bothered to go look for it though thus this comment. -Djsasso (talk) 03:23, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

  The purpose of the NFL templates is to navigate between pages related to different teams. The other blue links are not helpful for that. That's why I said relevant blue links. Blue links in a navbox's headers are often not helpful for its main purpose. -- Auntof6 (talk) 07:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Ozhan Akcakaya

Ozhan Akcakaya (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Promotional in tone. Awards are not mentioned in the sources and given by sources whose reliability is questionable. No significant, reliable coverage elsewhere. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 14:01, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Did the quite re-search Non the sources mentioned about subject --Ksy 18:25, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep The subjecy is a notable figure in the sports technology industry, recognized for founding HITNMOVE and introducing innovative training equipment widely used by professional athletes and trainers. His multiple awards, including Innovator of the Year (2022) and independent media coverage, establish his significant impact on the field, meeting Wikipedia's notability guidelines through verifiable contributions and global recognition 1.--Symonds Gerother (talk) 10:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment: - Symonds Gerother is the article creator and has been blocked for using multiple accounts. Ravensfire (talk) 16:27, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
    •  Comment: Symonds Gerother is also globally locked for cross-wiki abuse. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 16:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Minimal coverage of article subject in the sources, several paid/sponsored articles used as sources, promotional tone in article text. Ravensfire (talk) 16:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Jay Feldman

Jay Feldman (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Sources are not independent (as clearly written at the end of source 5: This article was written in cooperation with Dr. Jay Feldman), otherwise I found no significant coverage of this subject. Awards don't really make a case for notability either. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 13:52, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete No significant coverage. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 13:42, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep The subject is slightly notable. Content is need to be rewrite in neutral way. By Quick google search i found lots of article that not used in reference section. --Symonds Gerother (talk) 18:53, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete unable to find any reliable Coverage for subject.--Ksy 20:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Mutliple paid/sponsored sources, not enough significant coverage from decent sources to show notability. Ravensfire (talk) 21:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:52, 23 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. per discussion below, Article moved to Soap on a rope –Davey2010^Talk 19:29, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Soap on a Rope

Soap on a Rope (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Symonds Gerother has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Encyclopedic content on Wikipedia is expected to have a neutral and formal tone. Terms like "absolute knee-slapper" and references to sensitive topics such as "Prison rape" used for humor are inappropriate and do not align with Wikipedia’s guidelines on tone and sensitivity. Such language could make the article feel biased or trivializing rather than factual. Symonds Gerother (talk) 06:26, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep The article is sourced and I have removed the offending text. The capitalization should be changed, however. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:53, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep The Article is notable.--Ksy 18:54, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 06:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. /Withdrawn as per discussion below –Davey2010^Talk 14:42, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Burn Hall Srinagar

Burn Hall Srinagar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, cannot find any evidence of any notability, As far as I can see en:Burn Hall School is a completely different school as that article doesn't mention Baramula. Fails NSCHOOL and GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 17:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

If both schools are the same then I'll withdraw but I don't think they are ? –Davey2010^Talk 17:51, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

I think they are both the same school. Perhaps it should be moved to the enwiki name and expanded. fr33kman 10:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Fr33kman, I think so too tbh, I was comparing both articles and the Simple one omitted things the Enwiki had but both articles mention the sister schools in Abbottabad so I'm now slightly more confident this is the same school,

I just didn't want to move these in case this was another school so thanks for your reply and confirming it's not :), Many thanks, Warmest Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 14:40, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:45, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 10:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Reb3l

Reb3l (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable and fails WP:GNG. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 01:02, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Unreferenced, References Selection are that not references, How users created their articles like this. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 02:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

  i refereneced website Ichamara (talk) 02:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Ichamara, You don't referenced website, Please improve your article during discussion Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 04:58, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

• Mr. Asteralee

I hope this message finds you well.

My name is Isuru Chamara, and I am the electronic music producer known as REB3L.I understand that Wikipedia has strict notability guidelines, and I have been working diligently to ensure that my page meets those standards. I have made several revisions to the page to improve its tone, structure, and content, and I believe it now provides a more accurate and neutral representation of my career.

I have also been actively seeking more independent sources to strengthen the page's notability, and I am confident that I will be able to provide further evidence of significant coverage in the near future.

I kindly request that you take a look at the revised page and consider my efforts to comply with Wikipedia's guidelines. I am committed to maintaining a neutral and informative page that adheres to Wikipedia's standards.

Thank you

Isuru Chamara Ichamara (talk) 02:06, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Promotional, Unreferenced BLP.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:46, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

  yes i changed the promotional tone and added more references. Ichamara (talk) 17:24, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Ichamara, FusionSub Voted you Delete because you don't improve your articles during discussion, Your article Is Not Notable. your article will deleted in 7 Days when Request is Closed, thank you Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 17:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

  What do u mean by not notable? Ichamara (talk) 22:40, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Ichamara Please see Wikipedia:Notability (people) for more information. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 22:42, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

  His music is in famous techno spotify playlist in Sri Lanka . so pepoles looking for him in google sometimes. He is famous or popular in a small circle. Here is the definition of popular in oxford dictionary (liked or admired by many people or by a particular person or group). Ichamara (talk) 02:48, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

• He is a known artists in sri lankan techno community. 2402:4000:2180:DC4C:553F:338A:69B5:3184 (talk) 04:30, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:02, 22 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 10:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Wahhabi Attacks on Najaf (1802-1805)

Wahhabi Attacks on Najaf (1802-1805) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I have done a re-search and could not find any reality on this. Other please check if I am not wrong, Ksy 17:53, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Non-Notable Conflicts, How they created their article like this, It's not notable Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 05:59, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:53, 21 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Trump Unyielding

Trump Unyielding (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: not-notable book. The sources don't appear independent of the subject. Depextual (talk) 15:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• KEEP The book passes Wikipedia:Notability (books) Specifically Rule 1. I find PML Daily Notable and I also Verified and found that the eBook is still on the amazon bestseller list Editeur16 (talk) 21:36, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 10:53, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

NBC June 04, 2002 Schedule Lineup

NBC June 04, 2002 Schedule Lineup (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: like a directory, not relevant for Wikipedia Depextual (talk) 21:49, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete WP:NOT.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 12:44, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 10:52, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Aladdin and Jasmine

Aladdin and Jasmine (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No need to have a single article covering two characters, and poor grammar Depextual (talk) 19:37, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nom - We don't have articles for just 2 characters..... Would be better as separate articles, not enough content to separate, thanks, --–Davey2010^Talk 19:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Agreed with nominator.--Ksy 21:20, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 10:52, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Ram Mani Pandey

Ram Mani Pandey (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability and Some Self Published Articles Ksy 18:59, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Non-Notable Article, how users created their new articles like this. Delete article Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 06:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Two sources for another person, the rest aren't actual sources. Ravensfire (talk) 21:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:59, 20 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Soft delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:51, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Oladipupo Tijani

Oladipupo Tijani (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This page is just Like a CV with ton of advertisement of Oladipupo seem like editor has close relation with subject with Zero Notability Ksy 18:51, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 10:50, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Mjrhoades

User:Mjrhoades (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

DaneGeld has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: User is using their userpage as a CV, possibly in preparation to write an article about themselves. Not covered by QD so sending to RFD. DaneGeld (talk) 17:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Quick Delete G11 as an advert. --–Davey2010^Talk 18:20, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

User has since blanked the majority of their page so I'd have no objections to their userpage just being blanked. –Davey2010^Talk 21:42, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

• Hello DaneGeld,

As you probably realize, I am very new to creating a Wiki article. This one was my first attempt to test the waters as it were.

Can you tell me what "Not covered by QD" refers to? Any suggestions?

I do have a full CV on my web site so that is not the intention of my Wiki... however, I am sure I am now yet aware of the flavor of it.

Does this mean my user is deleted or just the page I was working on?

Thanks for your help,

Michael Mjrhoades (talk) 18:16, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi Mjrhoades. QD is an abbreviated name for one of our processes for removing things from the site, it refers to "Quick Deletion". Items can only be deleted in this way, if they fall into certain categories, such as not being written in English, if they are written again after being deleted, and so on.

Because this article doesn't fit into those categories, I put it here so that others can make a decision on what they think. Your userpage hasn't been deleted yet, but it will be for other members of the site to vote on, based on what you have on your user page. You however, as a user, will not be deleted because of this.

I hope you will continue to edit here - it can be a little disheartening for someone to see their work being voted on to possibly be removed. Please don't take it personally! Regards to you, Christian DaneGeld (talk) 21:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

• Quick Delete Per Davey2010. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 02:00, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete A user's page can be used as a sandbox, and by the user page content, it's clearly not copyrighted material, or anything that could get it deleted or the user blocked. per the reply. RiggedMint 16:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

  @RiggedMint, "A user's page can be used as a sandbox" - Indeed it can but this isn't a sandbox and doesn't even come close to being one.

  "it's clearly not copyrighted material, or anything that could get it deleted - Well that's wrong because G11 applies here as it's quite clearly an advert..... The lead begins with "Dr. Michael Rhoades" and the creator is User:Mjrhoades ....,

  There's no evidence of any notability for this subject so keeping is pointless, If there was any evidence of any notability or if this subject was at enwiki then that would be a different matter but they're not. Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 17:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

  I see, I saw through myself on this one; I will change it to a delete vote. RiggedMint 17:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

  No worries @RiggedMint we all do that from time to time so don't worry you're good :), Thank you for amending your !vote, Happy editing, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 17:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 10:48, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Joseph Williams (singer)

Joseph Williams (singer) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article is about Joseph Williams but all the sources are about Sam Williams. There's no proof that Joseph is notable. Depextual (talk) 13:34, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep Notable Article --Scollball92 (talk) 08:17, 15 November 2024 (UTC) user has been globally locked --Lymantria (talk) 13:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete LTA target --Lymantria (talk) 13:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Notable — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diplediple (talk • contribs) 02:20, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

  — This user has made few or no contributions outside of this page. Depextual (talk) 07:30, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Soft delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Mk Timothy

Mk Timothy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

আফতাবুজ্জামান has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable. The article has some refs, but all of them are basically interview masquerading as article, WP:PRIMARY. There is no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, fails WP:GNG. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 10:50, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

• Also note that the article has been deleted multiple times from enwiki for various reasons. And the article creator is a sock (see their enwiki contribution). আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 10:52, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 10:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 10:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Bhikitia

Bhikitia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Tanbiruzzaman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable per WP:GNG & WP:ORG. First source used in the article is MENAFN, which is paid news, rest other bengali sources aren’t reliable itself, like random news sites created by random people. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 04:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete Zero WP:SIGCOV. There is no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. This site was created 1 month ago by a Bengali en:WP:LTA name "Parvej Husen Talukder" (see their SPI page bn:উইকিপিডিয়া:সকপাপেট তদন্ত/মোঃ পারভেজ হুসেন তালুকদার & en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Parvej096388. Their main account and sock accouts are globally locked multiple times). They also run a local paid news for that and they are trying to use simple english wikipedia to promote their website. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 23:22, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
• Keep I find that it's founder is a en:WP:LTA But this article is not promotional, we can remove promotional-type content from this article. News are not paid may be, paid news be tagged as "Notice" "Press release" etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.142.80.118 (talk) 03:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep: A governing body running this site, we should not think only founder's matter. See on this page and news references are reliable, significant and independent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2400:C600:4722:9D81:1C9E:DCFF:FEA2:BF08 (talk) 03:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment: I'm pretty sure the above two IPs are sockpuppet. Anyway, as i said, there is no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The cited four sources are local website and not reliable source. Not only that, they are either paid news or press release. Just use https://text-compare.com/ and compare source 1 with 2 and source 3 with 4, strangely they are almost same text (with some editing). --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

• Delete. The article is undoubtedly non-notable. There is no significant description for this article in the newspaper. And Aftabuzzaman mention above that this work done by a sock. It is clear fact and already twice comment done by that sock. DeloarAkram (talk) 05:51, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

  Aftabujjaman also emailed to Jalapabad Newspaper to delete their news, this is a notable encyclopaedia. [4] 42.0.7.232 (talk) 10:17, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 10:45, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Tombstone (character)

Tombstone (character) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article has been created from Ban User Ksy 20:04, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete - regardless of who created this, it doesn't meet GNG. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Page is now a dab. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Warkany syndrome

Warkany syndrome (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: May have been copied from another website. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 17:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete AI Generated and Unreferenced Articles, How users create their articles like this! Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 18:03, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment: @Asteralee Not they just copied another website, It's an AI Generated Article, You can detect AI Using AI Detector like ZeroGPT or GPT Zero Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 18:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete LLM generated, can we just write it in guideline that we can't use AIs/LLMs?- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 12:48, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Replaced it with a common disambiguation page. No, not AI generated...--Eptalon (talk) 11:41, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
• keep now it's been fixed into a dab page. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:49, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Soft delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:41, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Ahmad J. Naous

Ahmad J. Naous (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and NPROF. Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. BRP ^ever 17:15, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 10:40, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Shaik AllaBakashu

Shaik AllaBakashu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

131.109.227.10 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: These sources all seem to be paid coverage. They are all promotional, and so the subject does not seem to be notable enough for an article here. I also searched on Google and Google News, but found minimal coverage. 131.109.227.10 (talk) 15:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep This article should remain on Wikipedia because Shaik AllaBakashu is a notable figure in the Telugu film industry, recognized for his dual contributions as an actor and producer under SAB Creations. His prominent roles in films like Kaveri (2024 movie) and Manoharam, along with his impact on regional cinema and upcoming projects, establish his cultural significance and enduring influence in Indian entertainment [5].
•  Keep Likely Notable. --QwErTyUiOpaSDg20 (talk) 19:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
• (Non-checkuser observation) Both of the users who voted keep have been blocked for sockpuppetry. Depextual (talk) 17:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Article is full of short blog / spam articles that were virtually identical. This feels like a UPE article and was pretty promotional. There's not enough to show how they meet WP:NACTOR. Ravensfire (talk) 14:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 10:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Vijay Naidu

Vijay Naidu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

131.109.227.10 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The sources all appear to be paid coverage, and are promotional. The subject is likely not notable enough for an article here. I have searched Google News and there are some more results, but they are also promotional. 131.109.227.10 (talk) 15:37, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete no significant coverage that is not promotional in nature Yelromcc (talk) 15:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep The article on Vijay Naidu should be retained due to his significant impact as a fintech entrepreneur and network marketing leader in India, recognized through multiple awards like "Entrepreneur of the Year - Fintech." His company, True Vision Training and Consultancy Pvt. Ltd., has reached over 100,000 individuals, providing financial literacy and mentorship in underserved communities, which meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for impactful business figures[6].--Symonds Gerother (talk) 15:55, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The subject is notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuskrey (talk • contribs) 19:14, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep it looks better article and notable, We don't delete article i voted keep Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 02:12, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
• Comment please extend this for another day or two. There are some troubling aspects here with sources that I'm trying to go through plus raise at an AN discussion that may affect this discussion. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 20:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

  Ahh, they've now been blocked for multiple accounts. [7] QD as G5 might be an option here.

  The reason I was asking for a pause was several of the sources are very clear paid/sponsored articles [8] and [[9]] have very, very obvious disclaimers and should not be used as sources for anything other than the most basic of facts. Multiple other sources were exactly the same. Several interviews all published on October 1 or 2 2024 - all puff interviews, that's a paid marketing push.

  I've removed a lot of what wasn't supported (all of the awards - shocking!), and trimmed other areas. Ravensfire (talk) 20:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

   Delete given the article after the removal of much of the sources and the creator blocked for multiple accounts. I've got concerns about the remaining sources so overall, delete the article as not notable. Ravensfire (talk) 20:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 10:38, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Dr. Joseph Goodman

Dr. Joseph Goodman (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Sounds like an advertisement and barely any independent sources. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 13:19, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Non-notable dentist. The sources are all promotional or not independent. Depextual (talk) 21:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Soft delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:36, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Battle of Dali

Battle of Dali (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Mr.Hanes has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: "The article is not notable, the term "battle of Dali" seems to be an invented term, it barely cites WP:RS sources, none of the sources exclusively call it a "Pakistani victory" Heavy POV pushing, it neither cites neutral sources nor neutral views, the entire conclusion of the article is based on what Pakistani media thinks and portraits Mr.Hanes (talk) 08:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Soft delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:36, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Battle of Jassar Bridge

Battle of Jassar Bridge (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Mr.Hanes has nominated this page for deletion:"The article is not notable, the term "battle of jassar bridge" seems to be an invented term, it barely cites neutral and WP:RS sources, none of the sources exclusively call it a "Pakistani victory"Mr.Hanes (talk) 08:28, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Soft delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:35, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Capture of Kishangarh Fort

Capture of Kishangarh Fort (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Mr.Hanes has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Heavy POV pushing, it neither cites neutral sources nor neutral views, the entire conclusion of the article is based on what Pakistani media thinks and portrays Mr.Hanes (talk) 07:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:33, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Kadhalan

Kadhalan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I dig a quite digging but could not found any notability Ksy 16:52, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep Needs a bit of cleaning up but this is definitely a notable movie. See the enwiki article, there are some good sources there.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 13:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 10:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Operation Kahuta

Operation Kahuta (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not enough notability for page Ksy 21:18, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Yeah I don't think this is significant enough for its own article. It might be mergeable but I'm not sure where and how. If anyone wants to merge it, go ahead.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 13:21, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pages

• All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
• Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
• Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
• Wikipedia:Deletion policy
• Wikipedia:Quick deletion
• Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
• Category:Deletion requests
• Category:Quick deletion requests