Comparison of fixed and adjustable window width and level settings in the CT evaluation of diffuse lung disease - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1993 Nov-Dec;17(6):847-52.
doi: 10.1097/00004728-199311000-00002.

Comparison of fixed and adjustable window width and level settings in the CT evaluation of diffuse lung disease

W M Maguire  1 , P G Herman, A Khan, R H Smith, S Noma, T M Eacobacci, D M Barlev, N Mandell, A Sunshine, M Carlin
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of fixed and adjustable window width and level settings in the CT evaluation of diffuse lung disease

W M Maguire et al. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1993 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this investigation was to assess the utility of allowing free adjustment of window width and level in comparison with the use of a fixed lung window in the CT evaluation of diffuse lung disease.

Materials and methods: Six radiologists each judged 36 cases (28 diffuse lung disease and 8 normal) using a standardized form. In half of the sessions, images were viewed in a fixed lung window (level = -500 HU; width = 2,000 HU). In the other sessions, the observer was able to adjust the window and level freely while viewing the images. Each case was seen twice in separate sessions: once in a fixed lung window and once with window width and level adjusted by the reader. A variety of diagnostic features were evaluated using a 5 point scale. These included visibility of fine lung structures, abnormalities of the lung parenchyma, and overall evaluation of the lung.

Results: The visibility of lung structures was not improved with adjustable window settings. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed fixed windows to be superior to adjustable windows for overall evaluation of the cases [fixed A(z) = 0.90, adjustable A(z) = 0.84, p < 0.05, jackknife method]. Time to rate each case was increased by 15% with window width and level adjustment.

Conclusion: Free adjustment of window width and level produced no improvement in reader performance over that achieved with fixed window width and level.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms