Effect of a deep learning-based system on the miss rate of gastric neoplasms during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a single-centre, tandem, randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 34297944
- DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00216-8
Effect of a deep learning-based system on the miss rate of gastric neoplasms during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a single-centre, tandem, randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Background: White light endoscopy is a pivotal first-line tool for the detection of gastric neoplasms. However, gastric neoplasms can be missed during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy due to the subtle nature of these lesions and varying skill among endoscopists. Here, we aimed to evaluate the effect of an artificial intelligence (AI) system designed to detect focal lesions and diagnose gastric neoplasms on reducing the miss rate of gastric neoplasms in clinical practice.
Methods: This single-centre, randomised controlled, tandem trial was done at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, China. We recruited consecutive patients (≥18 years old) undergoing routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for screening, surveillance, or investigation of symptoms. Same-day tandem upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was done where patients first underwent either AI-assisted (AI-first) or routine (routine-first) white light endoscopy, followed immediately by the other procedure, with targeted biopsies for all detected lesions taken at the end of the second examination. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the AI-first or routine-first group using a computer-generated random numerical series and block randomisation (block size of four). Endoscopists were not blinded to randomisation status, whereas patients and pathologists were. The primary endpoint was the miss rate of gastric neoplasms and the analysis was done per protocol. This trial is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000034453, and has been completed.
Findings: Between July 6, 2020, and Dec 11, 2020, 907 patients were randomly assigned to the AI-first group and 905 to the routine-first group. The gastric neoplasm miss rate was significantly lower in the AI-first group than in the routine-first group (6·1%, 95% CI 1·6-17·9 [3/49] vs 27·3%, 15·5-43·0 [12/44]; relative risk 0·224, 95% CI 0·068-0·744; p=0·015). The only reported adverse event was bleeding from a target lesion after biopsy.
Interpretation: The use of an AI system during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy significantly reduced the gastric neoplasm miss rate. AI-assisted endoscopy has the potential to improve the yield of gastric neoplasms by endoscopists.
Funding: The Project of Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision and the Hubei Province Major Science and Technology Innovation Project.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests.
Comment in
-
Early detection of gastric neoplasia: is artificial intelligence the solution?Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Sep;6(9):678-679. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00254-5. Epub 2021 Jul 21. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021. PMID: 34297943 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effect of an artificial intelligence-assisted system on endoscopic diagnosis of superficial oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and precancerous lesions: a multicentre, tandem, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Jan;9(1):34-44. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00276-5. Epub 2023 Nov 10. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024. PMID: 37952555 Clinical Trial.
-
Lower Adenoma Miss Rate of Computer-Aided Detection-Assisted Colonoscopy vs Routine White-Light Colonoscopy in a Prospective Tandem Study.Gastroenterology. 2020 Oct;159(4):1252-1261.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.06.023. Epub 2020 Jun 17. Gastroenterology. 2020. PMID: 32562721 Clinical Trial.
-
Detection of colorectal adenomas with a real-time computer-aided system (ENDOANGEL): a randomised controlled study.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Apr;5(4):352-361. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30413-3. Epub 2020 Jan 22. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020. PMID: 31981518 Clinical Trial.
-
Artificial Intelligence in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.Dig Dis. 2022;40(4):395-408. doi: 10.1159/000518232. Epub 2021 Jul 21. Dig Dis. 2022. PMID: 34348267 Review.
-
Striving for quality improvement: can artificial intelligence help?Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun-Aug;52-53:101722. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2020.101722. Epub 2020 Dec 29. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2021. PMID: 34172249 Review.
Cited by
-
Risk factors of missed early gastric cancer in endoscopic resected population: a retrospective, case-control study.Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4380-4389. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10970-0. Epub 2024 Jun 17. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 38886230
-
Aggregation-Induced Emission Luminogen: Role in Biopsy for Precision Medicine.Chem Rev. 2024 Oct 23;124(20):11242-11347. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00244. Epub 2024 Oct 8. Chem Rev. 2024. PMID: 39380213 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Randomized Clinical Trials of Machine Learning Interventions in Health Care: A Systematic Review.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2233946. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33946. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 36173632 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy: Umbrella Review.JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Jul 15;12:e56361. doi: 10.2196/56361. JMIR Med Inform. 2024. PMID: 39093715 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Deep Learning Models for Anatomical Location Classification in Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Images and Videos: A Quantitative Evaluation with Clinical Data.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 23;14(21):2360. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14212360. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39518328 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials