Deep learning-based differentiation of invasive adenocarcinomas from preinvasive or minimally invasive lesions among pulmonary subsolid nodules
- PMID: 33555355
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07620-z
Deep learning-based differentiation of invasive adenocarcinomas from preinvasive or minimally invasive lesions among pulmonary subsolid nodules
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate a deep learning-based model using model-generated segmentation masks to differentiate invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma (IPA) from preinvasive lesions or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) on CT, making comparisons with radiologist-derived measurements of solid portion size.
Methods: Four hundred eleven subsolid nodules (SSNs) (120 preinvasive lesions or MIAs and 291 IPAs) in 333 patients who underwent surgery between June 2010 and August 2016 were retrospectively included to develop the model (370 SSNs in 293 patients for training and 41 SSNs in 40 patients for tuning). Ninety SSNs of 2 cm or smaller (45 preinvasive lesions or MIAs and 45 IPAs) resected in 2018 formed a validation set. Six radiologists measured the solid portion of each nodule. Performances of the model and radiologists were assessed using receiver operating characteristics curve analysis.
Results: The deep learning model differentiated IPA from preinvasive lesions or MIA with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.914, 0.956, and 0.833 for the training, tuning, and validation sets, respectively. The mean AUC of the radiologists was 0.835 in the validation set, without significant differences between radiologists and the model (p = 0.97). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the model were 71% (32/45), 87% (39/45), and 79% (71/90), respectively, whereas the corresponding values of the radiologists were 75.2% (203/270), 76.7% (207/270), and 75.9% (410/540) with a 5-mm threshold for the solid portion size.
Conclusions: The performance of the model for differentiating IPA from preinvasive lesions or MIA was comparable to that of the radiologists' measurements of solid portion size.
Key points: • A deep learning-based model differentiated IPA from preinvasive lesions or MIA with AUCs of 0.914 and 0.956 for the training and tuning sets, respectively. • In the validation set including subsolid nodules of 2 cm or smaller, the model showed an AUC of 0.833, being on par with the performance of the solid portion size measurements made by the radiologists (AUC, 0.835; p = 0.97). • SSNs with a solid portion measuring > 10 mm on CT showed a high probability of being IPA (positive predictive value, 93.5-100.0%).
Keywords: Adenocarcinoma of lung; Deep learning; Neoplasm; Tomography, X-ray computed.
© 2021. European Society of Radiology.
Similar articles
-
A simple prediction model using size measures for discrimination of invasive adenocarcinomas among incidental pulmonary subsolid nodules considered for resection.Eur Radiol. 2019 Apr;29(4):1674-1683. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5739-x. Epub 2018 Sep 25. Eur Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30255253
-
Validation of prediction models for risk stratification of incidentally detected pulmonary subsolid nodules: a retrospective cohort study in a Korean tertiary medical centre.BMJ Open. 2018 May 24;8(5):e019996. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019996. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 29794091 Free PMC article.
-
A comparative study to evaluate CT-based semantic and radiomic features in preoperative diagnosis of invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas manifesting as subsolid nodules.Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 18;11(1):66. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79690-4. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33462251 Free PMC article.
-
Subsolid pulmonary nodules: imaging evaluation and strategic management.Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2012 Jul;18(4):304-12. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e328354a5f2. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2012. PMID: 22575798 Review.
-
Pulmonary subsolid nodules: what radiologists need to know about the imaging features and management strategy.Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):47-57. doi: 10.5152/dir.2013.13223. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24100062 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
An ensemble deep learning model for risk stratification of invasive lung adenocarcinoma using thin-slice CT.NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Jul 5;6(1):119. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00866-z. NPJ Digit Med. 2023. PMID: 37407729 Free PMC article.
-
A deep learning approach for predicting visceral pleural invasion in cT1 lung adenocarcinoma.J Thorac Dis. 2024 Sep 30;16(9):5675-5687. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-601. Epub 2024 Sep 19. J Thorac Dis. 2024. PMID: 39444851 Free PMC article.
-
3D deep learning versus the current methods for predicting tumor invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma based on high-resolution computed tomography images.Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 21;12:995870. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.995870. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36338695 Free PMC article.
-
Utilizing Synthetic Nodules for Improving Nodule Detection in Chest Radiographs.J Digit Imaging. 2022 Aug;35(4):1061-1068. doi: 10.1007/s10278-022-00608-9. Epub 2022 Mar 18. J Digit Imaging. 2022. PMID: 35304676 Free PMC article.
-
A radiomics nomogram for invasiveness prediction in lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as part-solid nodules with solid components smaller than 6 mm.Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 11;12:900049. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.900049. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36033463 Free PMC article.
References
-
- MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM et al (2017) Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology 284:228–243 - DOI
-
- Cho J, Ko SJ, Kim SJ et al (2014) Surgical resection of nodular ground-glass opacities without percutaneous needle aspiration or biopsy. BMC Cancer 14:838 - DOI
-
- Lee SM, Park CM, Song YS et al (2017) CT assessment-based direct surgical resection of part-solid nodules with solid component larger than 5 mm without preoperative biopsy: experience at a single tertiary hospital. Eur Radiol 27:5119–5126 - DOI
-
- Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Muller NL, Remy J (2008) Fleischner society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology 246:697–722 - DOI
-
- Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R et al (2002) CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1053–1057 - DOI
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical