Gestational weight gain and foetal acidosis in vaginal and caesarean deliveries: The Japan Environment and Children's Study - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 23;10(1):20389.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77429-9.

Gestational weight gain and foetal acidosis in vaginal and caesarean deliveries: The Japan Environment and Children's Study

Collaborators, Affiliations

Gestational weight gain and foetal acidosis in vaginal and caesarean deliveries: The Japan Environment and Children's Study

Tsuyoshi Murata et al. Sci Rep. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Inappropriate gestational weight gain (GWG), either above or below the recommended values, has been associated with an increased risk of adverse obstetric outcomes. To evaluate the risks of GWG for foetal acidosis according to pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and mode of delivery, we analysed women with singleton pregnancies between 2011 and 2014 in the Japan Environment and Children's Study. Participants (n = 71,799) were categorised according to pre-pregnancy BMI. GWG was categorised into insufficient, appropriate, or excessive. Foetal acidosis was defined as umbilical artery pH (UmA-pH) < 7.20 or < 7.10. Multiple logistic regressions were performed for each BMI category to identify the risks of GWG for foetal acidosis, accounting for the mode of delivery. Excessive GWG was significantly associated with increased foetal acidosis in overweight women and in women whose pre-pregnancy BMI was 23.0-25.0 kg/m2 especially in those with vaginal deliveries. Conversely, excessive GWG was not significantly associated with increased foetal acidosis in obese women and in women whose pre-pregnancy BMI was ≥ 25.0 kg/m2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of study enrolment.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Goldstein RF, et al. Association of gestational weight gain with maternal and infant outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2017;317:2207–2225. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.3635. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Nutritional Status During Pregnancy and Lactation . Nutrition During Pregnancy: Part I: Weight Gain, Part II Nutrient Supplements. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1990. - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine (US), National Research Council (US) Committee to reexamine IOM pregnancy weight guidelines. In: Rasmussen K, Yaktine AL, editors. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009. - PubMed
    1. Physical status: The use and interpretation of anthropometry: Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ. Tech. Rep. Ser.854, 1–452 (1995). - PubMed
    1. Persson M, Johansson S, Cnattingius S. Inter-pregnancy weight change and risks of severe birth-asphyxia-related outcomes in singleton infants born at term: A nationwide Swedish cohort study. PLoS Med. 2016;13:e1002033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002033. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms