Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study
- PMID: 31679945
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32591-7
Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study
Erratum in
-
Department of Error.Lancet. 2020 Jan 25;395(10220):272. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30116-1. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 31982072 No abstract available.
-
Department of Error.Lancet. 2020 Feb 22;395(10224):564. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30254-3. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 32087792 No abstract available.
-
Department of Error.Lancet. 2021 Jun 12;397(10291):2252. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01119-3. Lancet. 2021. PMID: 34119067 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Pembrolizumab is active in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression associated with improved response.
Methods: KEYNOTE-048 was a randomised, phase 3 study of participants with untreated locally incurable recurrent or metastatic HNSCC done at 200 sites in 37 countries. Participants were stratified by PD-L1 expression, p16 status, and performance status and randomly allocated (1:1:1) to pembrolizumab alone, pembrolizumab plus a platinum and 5-fluorouracil (pembrolizumab with chemotherapy), or cetuximab plus a platinum and 5-fluorouracil (cetuximab with chemotherapy). Investigators and participants were aware of treatment assignment. Investigators, participants, and representatives of the sponsor were masked to the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) results; PD-L1 positivity was not required for study entry. The primary endpoints were overall survival (time from randomisation to death from any cause) and progression-free survival (time from randomisation to radiographically confirmed disease progression or death from any cause, whichever came first) in the intention-to-treat population (all participants randomly allocated to a treatment group). There were 14 primary hypotheses: superiority of pembrolizumab alone and of pembrolizumab with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for overall survival and progression-free survival in the PD-L1 CPS of 20 or more, CPS of 1 or more, and total populations and non-inferiority (non-inferiority margin: 1·2) of pembrolizumab alone and pembrolizumab with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for overall survival in the total population. The definitive findings for each hypothesis were obtained when statistical testing was completed for that hypothesis; this occurred at the second interim analysis for 11 hypotheses and at final analysis for three hypotheses. Safety was assessed in the as-treated population (all participants who received at least one dose of allocated treatment). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02358031.
Findings: Between April 20, 2015, and Jan 17, 2017, 882 participants were allocated to receive pembrolizumab alone (n=301), pembrolizumab with chemotherapy (n=281), or cetuximab with chemotherapy (n=300); of these, 754 (85%) had CPS of 1 or more and 381 (43%) had CPS of 20 or more. At the second interim analysis, pembrolizumab alone improved overall survival versus cetuximab with chemotherapy in the CPS of 20 or more population (median 14·9 months vs 10·7 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0·61 [95% CI 0·45-0·83], p=0·0007) and CPS of 1 or more population (12·3 vs 10·3, 0·78 [0·64-0·96], p=0·0086) and was non-inferior in the total population (11·6 vs 10·7, 0·85 [0·71-1·03]). Pembrolizumab with chemotherapy improved overall survival versus cetuximab with chemotherapy in the total population (13·0 months vs 10·7 months, HR 0·77 [95% CI 0·63-0·93], p=0·0034) at the second interim analysis and in the CPS of 20 or more population (14·7 vs 11·0, 0·60 [0·45-0·82], p=0·0004) and CPS of 1 or more population (13·6 vs 10·4, 0·65 [0·53-0·80], p<0·0001) at final analysis. Neither pembrolizumab alone nor pembrolizumab with chemotherapy improved progression-free survival at the second interim analysis. At final analysis, grade 3 or worse all-cause adverse events occurred in 164 (55%) of 300 treated participants in the pembrolizumab alone group, 235 (85%) of 276 in the pembrolizumab with chemotherapy group, and 239 (83%) of 287 in the cetuximab with chemotherapy group. Adverse events led to death in 25 (8%) participants in the pembrolizumab alone group, 32 (12%) in the pembrolizumab with chemotherapy group, and 28 (10%) in the cetuximab with chemotherapy group.
Interpretation: Based on the observed efficacy and safety, pembrolizumab plus platinum and 5-fluorouracil is an appropriate first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic HNSCC and pembrolizumab monotherapy is an appropriate first-line treatment for PD-L1-positive recurrent or metastatic HNSCC.
Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
PD-1 immunotherapy for recurrent or metastatic HNSCC.Lancet. 2019 Nov 23;394(10212):1882-1884. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32539-5. Epub 2019 Nov 1. Lancet. 2019. PMID: 31679948 No abstract available.
-
PD-1 inhibition enters the frontline.Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb;17(2):69. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0303-4. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31729474 No abstract available.
-
Keynote 48: Is it really for everyone?Oral Oncol. 2020 Jun;105:104762. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104762. Epub 2020 May 4. Oral Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32381470 No abstract available.
-
Further clinical interpretation and implications of KEYNOTE-048 findings.Lancet. 2020 Aug 8;396(10248):378. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30903-X. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 32771101 No abstract available.
-
Further clinical interpretation and implications of KEYNOTE-048 findings.Lancet. 2020 Aug 8;396(10248):378-379. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30904-1. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 32771102 No abstract available.
-
Further clinical interpretation and implications of KEYNOTE-048 findings.Lancet. 2020 Aug 8;396(10248):379. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30907-7. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 32771103 No abstract available.
-
Translating KEYNOTE-048 into practice recommendations for head and neck cancer.Ann Transl Med. 2020 Aug;8(15):975. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.164. Ann Transl Med. 2020. PMID: 32953775 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Reply to "Keynote 48: Is it really for everyone?".Oral Oncol. 2021 Jan;112:104983. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104983. Epub 2020 Oct 6. Oral Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33032941 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.Lancet. 2021 Aug 28;398(10302):759-771. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01234-4. Lancet. 2021. PMID: 34454674 Clinical Trial.
-
Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (KEYNOTE-355): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial.Lancet. 2020 Dec 5;396(10265):1817-1828. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32531-9. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 33278935 Clinical Trial.
-
Pembrolizumab alone or combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (KEYNOTE-361): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jul;22(7):931-945. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00152-2. Epub 2021 May 26. Lancet Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34051178 Clinical Trial.
-
Pembrolizumab for Previously Treated Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Jan;37(1):19-27. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0689-3. Pharmacoeconomics. 2019. PMID: 30030817 Review.
-
Pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma with disease progression during or following platinum-containing chemotherapy. A Cochrane Rapid Review.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 23;7(7):CD012838. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012838.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30036453 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Low PD-L1 expression, MAP2K2 alterations, and enriched HPV gene signatures characterize brain metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.J Transl Med. 2024 Oct 22;22(1):960. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05761-z. J Transl Med. 2024. PMID: 39438862 Free PMC article.
-
Tracking the dropout patients of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with locally advanced oral cavity cancer.BMC Cancer. 2021 Jun 3;21(1):663. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08420-4. BMC Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34078311 Free PMC article.
-
Current Management and Progress in Radiotherapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer.Front Oncol. 2020 Jul 14;10:1146. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01146. eCollection 2020. Front Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32760673 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Single-cell transcriptomic profiling for inferring tumor origin and mechanisms of therapeutic resistance.NPJ Precis Oncol. 2022 Oct 10;6(1):71. doi: 10.1038/s41698-022-00314-3. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36210388 Free PMC article.
-
Capecitabine for Salvage Treatment of Patients With Heavily Pretreated Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharynx Cancer With Distant Metastases.J Adv Pract Oncol. 2023 Nov;14(7):571-575. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2023.14.7.2. Epub 2023 Nov 1. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2023. PMID: 38196671 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous