Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr;23(2):60-63.
doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110853. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports

Affiliations

Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports

Mohammad Hassan Murad et al. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Case reports and case series are uncontrolled study designs known for increased risk of bias but have profoundly influenced the medical literature and continue to advance our knowledge. In this guide, we present a framework for appraisal, synthesis and application of evidence derived from case reports and case series. We propose a tool to evaluate the methodological quality of case reports and case series based on the domains of selection, ascertainment, causality and reporting and provide signalling questions to aid evidence-based practitioners and systematic reviewers in their assessment. We suggest using evidence derived from case reports and case series to inform decision-making when no other higher level of evidence is available.

Keywords: epidemiology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Herrick JB. Peculiar elongated and sickle-shaped red blood corpuscles in a case of severe anemia. Arch Intern Med 1910;VI:517 10.1001/archinte.1910.00050330050003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meyer H, Lundberg G. Landmark articles in medicine. Chicago: American Medical Association, 1985.
    1. Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, et al. . The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. J Med Case Rep 2013;7:223 10.1186/1752-1947-7-223 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Descriptive studies: what they can and cannot do. Lancet 2002;359:145–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07373-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abu-Zidan FM, Abbas AK, Hefny AF. Clinical “case series”: a concept analysis. Afr Health Sci 2012;12:557–62. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources