Major Depression Detection from EEG Signals Using Kernel Eigen-Filter-Bank Common Spatial Patterns - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 14;17(6):1385.
doi: 10.3390/s17061385.

Major Depression Detection from EEG Signals Using Kernel Eigen-Filter-Bank Common Spatial Patterns

Affiliations

Major Depression Detection from EEG Signals Using Kernel Eigen-Filter-Bank Common Spatial Patterns

Shih-Cheng Liao et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) has become a leading contributor to the global burden of disease; however, there are currently no reliable biological markers or physiological measurements for efficiently and effectively dissecting the heterogeneity of MDD. Here we propose a novel method based on scalp electroencephalography (EEG) signals and a robust spectral-spatial EEG feature extractor called kernel eigen-filter-bank common spatial pattern (KEFB-CSP). The KEFB-CSP first filters the multi-channel raw EEG signals into a set of frequency sub-bands covering the range from theta to gamma bands, then spatially transforms the EEG signals of each sub-band from the original sensor space to a new space where the new signals (i.e., CSPs) are optimal for the classification between MDD and healthy controls, and finally applies the kernel principal component analysis (kernel PCA) to transform the vector containing the CSPs from all frequency sub-bands to a lower-dimensional feature vector called KEFB-CSP. Twelve patients with MDD and twelve healthy controls participated in this study, and from each participant we collected 54 resting-state EEGs of 6 s length (5 min and 24 s in total). Our results show that the proposed KEFB-CSP outperforms other EEG features including the powers of EEG frequency bands, and fractal dimension, which had been widely applied in previous EEG-based depression detection studies. The results also reveal that the 8 electrodes from the temporal areas gave higher accuracies than other scalp areas. The KEFB-CSP was able to achieve an average EEG classification accuracy of 81.23% in single-trial analysis when only the 8-electrode EEGs of the temporal area and a support vector machine (SVM) classifier were used. We also designed a voting-based leave-one-participant-out procedure to test the participant-independent individual classification accuracy. The voting-based results show that the mean classification accuracy of about 80% can be achieved by the KEFP-CSP feature and the SVM classifier with only several trials, and this level of accuracy seems to become stable as more trials (i.e., <7 trials) are used. These findings therefore suggest that the proposed method has a great potential for developing an efficient (required only a few 6-s EEG signals from the 8 electrodes over the temporal) and effective (~80% classification accuracy) EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI) system which may, in the future, help psychiatrists provide individualized and effective treatments for MDD patients.

Keywords: brain-computer interface (BCI); common spatial pattern (CSP); electroencephalography (EEG); machine learning; major depressive disorder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustration of the EEG feature extraction method of kernel eigen-filter-bank common spatial pattern (KEFB-CSP).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Six different montages selected for comparison in this study. The montages from I to VI cover the frontal, central, temporal, parietal, occipital, and entire scalp areas of the brain.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of average classification accuracies over 54-trial EEGs among different classifiers.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Voting-based individual classification accuracy versus the number of the first nt trials. The KEFB-CSP features were all extracted from the eight electrodes over the temporal scalp area.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kupfer D.J., Frank E., Phillips M.L. Major depressive disorder: New clinical, neurobiological, and treatment perspectives. Lancet. 2012;379:1045–1055. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60602-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV-TR Washington 2000. American Psychiatric Association; Arlington, VA, USA: 2000.
    1. Murray C.J.L., Lopez A.D. Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: Global burden of disease study. Lancet. 1997;349:1498–1504. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07492-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vos T., Flaxman A.D., Naghavi M., Lozano R., Michaud C., Ezzati M., Shibuya K., Salomon J.A., Abdalla S., Aboyans V., et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2163–2196. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Papakostas G.I., Fava M. Does the probability of receiving placebo influence clinical trial outcome? A meta-regression of double-blind, randomized clinical trials in MDD. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009;19:34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2008.08.009. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources