Interneuron cell types are fit to function - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jan 16;505(7483):318-26.
doi: 10.1038/nature12983.

Interneuron cell types are fit to function

Adam Kepecs  1 , Gordon Fishell  2
Affiliations
Review

Interneuron cell types are fit to function

Adam Kepecs et al. Nature. .

Abstract

Understanding brain circuits begins with an appreciation of their component parts - the cells. Although GABAergic interneurons are a minority population within the brain, they are crucial for the control of inhibition. Determining the diversity of these interneurons has been a central goal of neurobiologists, but this amazing cell type has so far defied a generalized classification system. Interneuron complexity within the telencephalon could be simplified by viewing them as elaborations of a much more finite group of developmentally specified cardinal classes that become further specialized as they mature. Our perspective emphasizes that the ultimate goal is to dispense with classification criteria and directly define interneuron types by function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of interneuron diversity across the brain
Within each of the distinct anatomical regions of the brain exist discrete interneuron populations. In some of these cases the paralog relationships between subtypes within specific regions are obvious (such as the fast-spiking basket cells), while in others such as the hippocampal CCK basket populations they appear to uniquely population specific structures.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Interneurons subtypes are generated from discrete proliferative regions within the subpallium
On the Left side of this figure we show the progressive development of the telencephalon from being an undifferentiated epithelium to being divided up into discrete proliferative zones that produce particular interneuron populations. On the Right side we show a more anatomically accurate cross-section of the progenitor zones and then for illustration show a schematic of interneuron diversity in the cortex in the top panel. Interestingly, while common proliferative zone produce the entire diversity of interneurons across all telencephalic structures, unique cell types and gene expression are seen in interneuron populations that reside in particular telencephalic structures.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Two faces of interneuron function
A cortical circuit from the perspective of a VIP interneuron. The recruitment of VIP interneurons is constrained by the inputs it receives. The afferents can be long-range from other cortical areas and also neuromodulatory from the dorsal raphe (DR) and nucleus basalis (NB) via ionotropic receptors. The circuit impact of VIP interneurons is constrained by its outputs. The efferents are mostly to SST interneurons and to a smaller degree to PV interneurons, which lead to the disinhibition of a functional subset of principal cells (black).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Coordination and flow control hypotheses of recruitment
Left, Coordination hypothesis. The bottom trace shows a local field potential representing the network state in the hippocampus. The firing of different neuron types can be described in reference the LFP, both in terms of overall activity level and phase-relationship. Right, Flow control hypothesis. The bottom arrows mark the timing of three behavioral events, exit, entry and reward. The firing of different neurons can be described in reference to these events.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Group PIN, et al. Petilla terminology: nomenclature of features of GABAergic interneurons of the cerebral cortex. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008;9:557–68. (Comment: the best effort to date by physiologists, anatomists and developmental neurobiologists to come to a common nomenclature for GABAergic interneurons).

    1. Freund TF, Buzsáki G. Interneurons of the hippocampus. Hippocampus. 1996;6:347–470. - PubMed
    1. Markram H, et al. Interneurons of the neocortical inhibitory system. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2004;5:793–807. - PubMed
    1. Parra P, Gulyás AI, Miles R. How Many Subtypes of Inhibitory Cells in the Hippocampus? Neuron. 1998;20:983–993. - PubMed
    1. Brody T, Odenwald WF. Regulation of temporal identities during Drosophila neuroblast lineage development. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2005;17:672–675. - PubMed

Publication types