Optimal design for hetero-associative memory: hippocampal CA1 phase response curve and spike-timing-dependent plasticity - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 24;8(10):e77395.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077395. eCollection 2013.

Optimal design for hetero-associative memory: hippocampal CA1 phase response curve and spike-timing-dependent plasticity

Affiliations

Optimal design for hetero-associative memory: hippocampal CA1 phase response curve and spike-timing-dependent plasticity

Ryota Miyata et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Recently reported experimental findings suggest that the hippocampal CA1 network stores spatio-temporal spike patterns and retrieves temporally reversed and spread-out patterns. In this paper, we explore the idea that the properties of the neural interactions and the synaptic plasticity rule in the CA1 network enable it to function as a hetero-associative memory recalling such reversed and spread-out spike patterns. In line with Lengyel's speculation (Lengyel et al., 2005), we firstly derive optimally designed spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) rules that are matched to neural interactions formalized in terms of phase response curves (PRCs) for performing the hetero-associative memory function. By maximizing object functions formulated in terms of mutual information for evaluating memory retrieval performance, we search for STDP window functions that are optimal for retrieval of normal and doubly spread-out patterns under the constraint that the PRCs are those of CA1 pyramidal neurons. The system, which can retrieve normal and doubly spread-out patterns, can also retrieve reversed patterns with the same quality. Finally, we demonstrate that purposely designed STDP window functions qualitatively conform to typical ones found in CA1 pyramidal neurons.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Outline of our approach.
We derive pairs of PRCs and STDP window functions optimally recalling normal, reversed, and spread-out memory spike patterns.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Structure of hetero-associative memory model.
(A) Schematic diagram of a feedforward network with neural oscillators. Presynaptic neurons numbered formula image are characterized by their initial phases, formula image, representing their individual spiking timings. The angle of the radius line in the circle represents the initial phase. Postsynaptic neurons numbered formula image are characterized by their initial phases, formula image. The pre- and postsynaptic neurons are fully connected by formula image synaptic connections. (B) Phase response curves (PRCs) of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons recorded in vitro , . The abscissa represents the phase of a perturbation arrival, and the ordinate represents the phase shift of the postsynaptic spike in response to the perturbation current. (C) Typical STDP window functions observed in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. In the storage process, synaptic weights formula image are determined in accordance with an STDP learning rule depending on the phase difference between the pre- and postsynaptic spikes. Left: Symmetric plasticity rule . Right: Asymmetric plasticity rule .
Figure 3
Figure 3. Performance of hetero-associative memory model with typical parameters.
We use a typical STDP window function (left panel of Fig. 2C [16]) and the PRC (cell formula image1 in Fig. 2B [18]) measured from hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. In this simulation, formula image. Given a retrieval key pattern similar to formula image, formula image is to be retrieved (i.e., normal spike pattern retrieval). (A) Amplitudes of the overlaps formula image (formula image denotes the wavenumber) at equilibrium as a function of the noise intensity formula image when formula image. As defined in Eq. (26), formula image is the overlap between the first memory output pattern formula image and the retrieval output pattern formula image in the formula image-th frequency component: formula image. formula image represents the characteristic function of the postsynaptic phase distribution formula image at each wavenumber formula image. Solid curves are theoretical results obtained from Eq. (27); The plotted points are from numerical simulations using LPE (13). (B) An example of the PDF (19) and a histogram of phase difference formula image obtained by numerically solving the LPE (13) at equilibrium. formula image and formula image. (C) Amplitudes of the overlaps formula image (formula image) as a function of the concentration parameter formula image. As defined in Eq. (12), formula image is the overlap between the first memory key pattern formula image and the retrieval key pattern formula image in the formula image-th frequency component: formula image. formula image represents the characteristic function of the presynaptic phase distribution formula image at each wavenumber formula image. Solid curves are theoretical results obtained from Eq. (15); Plots are obtained from a retrieval key pattern randomly generated with the von Mises PDF (14). (D) Amplitudes of the overlaps formula image (formula image) at equilibrium as a function of formula image. formula image. Solid curves are theoretical results obtained from Eq. (27); The plots are from numerical simulations using LPE (13).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Examples of STDP window functions optimally matched to PRCs of five hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons shown in Fig. 2B.
(A–D) By maximizing the objective function formula image defined in Eq. (25), we searched for STDP window functions that are optimal for retrieving normal patterns. (A′–D′) By maximizing the objective function formula image defined in Eq. (24), we searched for ones that are optimal for both retrieving normal and doubly spread-out patterns. In all cases, formula image, formula image. We obtained connected sets of optimal STDP window functions, as described in the main article. Each of the four panels in the upper and lower rows plots examples of optimal STDP window functions with different phases. The numbers assigned to each line correspond to the cell indexes in Fig. 2B. All sets of optimal STDP window functions except for cell #1 have the same form. (A, A′) STDP window functions when formula image, which corresponds to the symmetric STDP rule. (B, B′) STDP window functions when formula image (B) and formula image (B′), which correspond to the asymmetric STDP rule. (C, C′) STDP window functions when formula image, which corresponds to the inverted symmetric STDP rule. (D, D′) STDP window functions when formula image (D) and formula image (D′), which correspond to the inverted asymmetric STDP rule.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Comparison of purposely designed STDP window functions (Figs. 4A′–D′) and those reported for the hippocampal CA1 region.
We computed the Fourier series of symmetric and asymmetric STDP window functions in Fig. 2C and compared the first two frequency components of the STDP window functions in Fig. 2C with those in Figs. 4A′–D′. (A) Symmetric and asymmetric STDP window functions composed of only the fundamental and second frequency components of the ones in Fig. 2C. Left: Symmetric plasticity rule . Right: Asymmetric plasticity rule . (B) Rates of fundamental and second frequency components of STDP window functions in Fig. 5A and the purposely designed ones in Figs. 4A′–D′. We compared the amplitudes between the two Fourier coefficients of each STDP window function, i.e., formula image and formula image. Symmetric: left panel of Fig. 5A . Asymmetric: right panel of Fig. 5A .
Figure 6
Figure 6. Confirmation that the system with the STDP window functions in Figs. 4(A′–D′) can function as intended.
The synaptic weight formula image was determined using the STDP window function (cell formula image5 in Fig. 4A′) to store three pairs of random phase patterns, formula image and formula image (formula image), and when presented with the retrieval key pattern generated with the conditional PDF (Eq. (14)) given formula image, the retrieval performance of the system with the determined synaptic weight and the measured PRC (cell #5 in Fig. 2B) was verified by using numerical simulations (formula image, formula image, formula image). (A) Normal spike pattern retrieval (formula image). (B) Reversed pattern retrieval (formula image). (C) Doubly spread-out pattern retrieval (formula image). Left column: Time evolution of the amplitude of the overlap between the formula image-th frequency component of formula image and the formula image-th frequency component of formula image, formula image. Center column: An example of the memory output pattern as originally stored, formula image. Right column: The retrieval output pattern formula image at equilibrium (corresponding to formula image in left column).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Skaggs WE, McNaughton BL (1996) Replay of neuronal firing sequences in rat hippocampus during sleep following spatial experience. Science 271: 1870–1873. - PubMed
    1. Nadasdy Z, Hirase H, Czurko A, Csicsvari J, Buzsaki G (1999) Replay and time compression of recurring spike sequences in the hippocampus. J Neurosci 19: 9497–9507. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee AK, Wilson MA (2002) Memory of sequential experience in the hippocampus during slow wave sleep. Neuron 36: 1183–1194. - PubMed
    1. Diba K, Buzsáki G (2007) Forward and reverse hippocampal place-cell sequences during ripples. Nat Neurosci 10: 1241–1242. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ji D, Wilson MA (2007) Coordinated memory replay in the visual cortex and hippocampus during sleep. Nat Neurosci 10: 100–107. - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Fellows [No. 12J09230 (RM)] and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) [No. 23500375 (TA)] from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.