On the costs of self-interested economic behavior: how does stinginess get under the skin?
- PMID: 20460419
- DOI: 10.1177/1359105309356366
On the costs of self-interested economic behavior: how does stinginess get under the skin?
Abstract
The present study examined how financial decisions 'get under the skin'. Participants played an economic game in which they could donate some of their payment to another student. Affect was measured afterward and salivary cortisol was measured before and afterward. Participants who kept more money for themselves reported less positive affect, more negative affect, and more shame. Shame predicted higher levels of post-game cortisol, controlling for pre-game cortisol; stingy economic behavior therefore produced a significant indirect effect on cortisol via shame. Thus, shame and cortisol represent plausible emotional and biological pathways linking everyday decisions with downstream consequences for health.
Similar articles
-
Acute threat to the social self: shame, social self-esteem, and cortisol activity.Psychosom Med. 2004 Nov-Dec;66(6):915-24. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000143639.61693.ef. Psychosom Med. 2004. PMID: 15564358 Clinical Trial.
-
Optimism, positive affectivity, and salivary cortisol.Br J Health Psychol. 2005 Nov;10(Pt 4):467-84. doi: 10.1348/135910705X26083. Br J Health Psychol. 2005. PMID: 16238860
-
Trait anxiety moderates the impact of performance pressure on salivary cortisol in everyday life.Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2006 May;31(4):459-72. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.11.003. Epub 2005 Dec 27. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2006. PMID: 16377094 Clinical Trial.
-
Expressed emotion, attribution, and control in parents of schizophrenic patients.Psychiatry. 2004 Summer;67(2):197-207. doi: 10.1521/psyc.67.2.197.35959. Psychiatry. 2004. PMID: 15262588
-
When the social self is threatened: shame, physiology, and health.J Pers. 2004 Dec;72(6):1191-216. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00295.x. J Pers. 2004. PMID: 15509281 Review.
Cited by
-
Prosocial reputation and stress among contemporary hunter-gatherers: the Hadza case.Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 13;14(1):21403. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72238-w. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39271949 Free PMC article.
-
Why do people spend money to help vulnerable people?PLoS One. 2019 Mar 15;14(3):e0213582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213582. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30875386 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Multiple Social Identities Enhance Health Post-Retirement Because They Are a Basis for Giving Social Support.Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 17;7:1519. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01519. eCollection 2016. Front Psychol. 2016. PMID: 27799916 Free PMC article.
-
Prosocial bonuses increase employee satisfaction and team performance.PLoS One. 2013 Sep 18;8(9):e75509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075509. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24058691 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
It's the recipient that counts: spending money on strong social ties leads to greater happiness than spending on weak social ties.PLoS One. 2011 Feb 10;6(2):e17018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017018. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 21347326 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources