Transition from paper to electronic inpatient physician notes - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):108-11.
doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3173.

Transition from paper to electronic inpatient physician notes

Thomas H Payne  1 , Aharon E tenBroek, Grant S Fletcher, Mardi C Labuguen
Affiliations

Transition from paper to electronic inpatient physician notes

Thomas H Payne et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

UW Medicine teaching hospitals have seen a move from paper to electronic physician inpatient notes, after improving the availability of workstations, and wireless laptops and the technical infrastructure supporting the electronic medical record (EMR). The primary driver for the transition was to unify the medical record for all disciplines in one location. The main barrier faced was the time required to enter notes, which was addressed with data-rich templates tailored to rounding workflow, simplified login and other measures. After a 2-year transition, nearly all physician notes for hospitalized patients are now entered electronically, approximately 1500 physician notes per day. Remaining challenges include time for note entry, and the perception that notes may be more difficult to understand and to find within the EMR. In general, the transition from paper to electronic notes has been regarded as valuable to patient care and hospital operations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of partially written note using Clinical Note Editor (A) and PowerNote (B) demonstrating differences in the end user experience. Clinical Note Editor has a familiar text editor appearance. PowerNote has the ability to run macros, insert needed paragraph headings, and other features. Both permit automatic inclusion of patient-specific data such as current medication lists. The patient data in this figure are fictitious.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Van Eaton EG, Horvath KD, Lober WB, et al. Organizing the transfer of patient care information: The development of a computerized resident sign-out system. Surgery 2004;136:5–13 - PubMed
    1. Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, et al. Use of electronic health records in US hospitals. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1628–38 - PubMed
    1. American Hospital Association Continued progress: hospital use of information technology. Chicago: American Hospital Association, 2007
    1. Clayton PD, Naus SP, Bowes WA, 3rd, et al. Physician use of electronic medical records: issues and successes with direct data entry and physician productivity. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2005:141–5 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Payne TH, Perkins M, Kalus R, et al. The transition to electronic documentation on a teaching hospital medical service. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006:629–33 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types