Automated model-based vertebra detection, identification, and segmentation in CT images - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jun;13(3):471-82.
doi: 10.1016/j.media.2009.02.004. Epub 2009 Feb 20.

Automated model-based vertebra detection, identification, and segmentation in CT images

Tobias Klinder  1 , Jörn Ostermann, Matthias Ehm, Astrid Franz, Reinhard Kneser, Cristian Lorenz
Affiliations

Automated model-based vertebra detection, identification, and segmentation in CT images

Tobias Klinder et al. Med Image Anal. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

For many orthopaedic, neurological, and oncological applications, an exact segmentation of the vertebral column including an identification of each vertebra is essential. However, although bony structures show high contrast in CT images, the segmentation and labelling of individual vertebrae is challenging. In this paper, we present a comprehensive solution for automatically detecting, identifying, and segmenting vertebrae in CT images. A framework has been designed that takes an arbitrary CT image, e.g., head-neck, thorax, lumbar, or whole spine, as input and provides a segmentation in form of labelled triangulated vertebra surface models. In order to obtain a robust processing chain, profound prior knowledge is applied through the use of various kinds of models covering shape, gradient, and appearance information. The framework has been tested on 64 CT images even including pathologies. In 56 cases, it was successfully applied resulting in a final mean point-to-surface segmentation error of 1.12+/-1.04mm. One key issue is a reliable identification of vertebrae. For a single vertebra, we achieve an identification success of more than 70%. Increasing the number of available vertebrae leads to an increase in the identification rate reaching 100% if 16 or more vertebrae are shown in the image.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

MeSH terms