Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial
- PMID: 19007693
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.031
Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of electrocardiographically gated 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) in individuals without known coronary artery disease (CAD).
Background: CCTA is a promising method for detection and exclusion of obstructive coronary artery stenosis. To date, no prospective multicenter trial has evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of 64-multidetector row CCTA in populations with intermediate prevalence of CAD.
Methods: We prospectively evaluated subjects with chest pain at 16 sites who were clinically referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA). CCTAs were scored by consensus of 3 independent blinded readers. The ICAs were evaluated for coronary stenosis based on quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). No subjects were excluded for baseline coronary artery calcium score or body mass index.
Results: A total of 230 subjects underwent both CCTA and ICA (59.1% male; mean age: 57 +/- 10 years). On a patient-based model, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values to detect > or =50% or > or =70% stenosis were 95%, 83%, 64%, and 99%, respectively, and 94%, 83%, 48%, 99%, respectively. No differences in sensitivity and specificity were noted for nonobese compared with obese subjects or for heart rates < or =65 beats/min compared with >65 beats/min, whereas calcium scores >400 reduced specificity significantly.
Conclusions: In this prospective multicenter trial of chest pain patients without known CAD, 64-multidetector row CCTA possesses high diagnostic accuracy for detection of obstructive coronary stenosis at both thresholds of 50% and 70% stenosis. Importantly, the 99% negative predictive value at the patient and vessel level establishes CCTA as an effective noninvasive alternative to ICA to rule out obstructive coronary artery stenosis. (A Study of Computed Tomography [CT] for Evaluation of Coronary Artery Blockages in Typical or Atypical Chest Pain; NCT00348569).
Comment in
-
Coronary computed tomography angiography: our time has come, but there are miles to go before we sleep.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 18;52(21):1733-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.034. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008. PMID: 19007694 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive 64-row Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography (CCTA) Compared with Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI): The PICTURE Study, A Prospective Multicenter Trial.Acad Radiol. 2017 Jan;24(1):22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Oct 19. Acad Radiol. 2017. PMID: 27771227
-
Relationship of coronary artery plaque composition to coronary artery stenosis severity: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY trial.Atherosclerosis. 2011 Dec;219(2):573-8. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.05.032. Epub 2011 May 31. Atherosclerosis. 2011. PMID: 21696739 Clinical Trial.
-
Sex comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the multicenter ACCURACY trial.J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2012 Jul-Aug;6(4):246-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.12.009. Epub 2012 May 30. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2012. PMID: 22732197 Clinical Trial.
-
Coronary computed tomographic angiography: current role in the diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease.Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2009 Jun;119(6):381-90. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2009. PMID: 19694220 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography for the evaluation of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2022 Aug;32(8):5189-5200. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08603-y. Epub 2022 Feb 22. Eur Radiol. 2022. PMID: 35192010 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Diagnostic Performance of On-Site Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Patient-specific Lumped Parameter Models.Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2019 Oct 31;1(4):e190036. doi: 10.1148/ryct.2019190036. eCollection 2019 Oct. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2019. PMID: 33778519 Free PMC article.
-
Toward evidence-based decisions in diagnostic radiology: a research and rating process for multiple decision-makers.Acad Radiol. 2012 Sep;19(9):1049-54. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.04.009. Epub 2012 Jun 23. Acad Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22727624 Free PMC article.
-
Potential for coronary CT angiography to tailor medical therapy beyond preventive guideline-based recommendations: insights from the ROMICAT I trial.J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015 May-Jun;9(3):193-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Feb 18. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015. PMID: 25846248 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Myocardial hypo-enhancement on resting computed tomography angiography images accurately identifies myocardial hypoperfusion.J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011 Nov-Dec;5(6):412-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.10.006. Epub 2011 Oct 24. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011. PMID: 22146500 Free PMC article.
-
Deep Learning-based Prediction of Percutaneous Recanalization in Chronic Total Occlusion Using Coronary CT Angiography.Radiology. 2023 Nov;309(2):e231149. doi: 10.1148/radiol.231149. Radiology. 2023. PMID: 37962501 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous