Spatial and temporal independent component analysis of functional MRI data containing a pair of task-related waveforms - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 May;13(1):43-53.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.1024.

Spatial and temporal independent component analysis of functional MRI data containing a pair of task-related waveforms

Affiliations

Spatial and temporal independent component analysis of functional MRI data containing a pair of task-related waveforms

V D Calhoun et al. Hum Brain Mapp. 2001 May.

Erratum in

Abstract

Independent component analysis (ICA) is a technique that attempts to separate data into maximally independent groups. Achieving maximal independence in space or time yields two varieties of ICA meaningful for functional MRI (fMRI) applications: spatial ICA (SICA) and temporal ICA (TICA). SICA has so far dominated the application of ICA to fMRI. The objective of these experiments was to study ICA with two predictable components present and evaluate the importance of the underlying independence assumption in the application of ICA. Four novel visual activation paradigms were designed, each consisting of two spatiotemporal components that were either spatially dependent, temporally dependent, both spatially and temporally dependent, or spatially and temporally uncorrelated, respectively. Simulated data were generated and fMRI data from six subjects were acquired using these paradigms. Data from each paradigm were analyzed with regression analysis in order to determine if the signal was occurring as expected. Spatial and temporal ICA were then applied to these data, with the general result that ICA found components only where expected, e.g., S(T)ICA "failed" (i.e., yielded independent components unrelated to the "self-evident" components) for paradigms that were spatially (temporally) dependent, and "worked" otherwise. Regression analysis proved a useful "check" for these data, however strong hypotheses will not always be available, and a strength of ICA is that it can characterize data without making specific modeling assumptions. We report a careful examination of some of the assumptions behind ICA methodologies, provide examples of when applying ICA would provide difficult-to-interpret results, and offer suggestions for applying ICA to fMRI data especially when more than one task-related component is present in the data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Visual depiction of SICA and TICA of fMRI. The matrix representation of the SICA (a) and TICA (b) approaches. In each case, the spatial information is flattened into one dimension and the temporal information is one dimension. In SICA, the algorithm attempts to find spatially independent components with associated (unconstrained) time courses whereas in TICA the algorithm attempts to find temporally independent time courses with associated spatial maps.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graphical depiction of paradigms. The same basic paradigms were used for both the simulations and the fMRI experiments. The time courses represent the 6‐min experiment and the squares illustrate what the subjects were seeing in the scanner at each indicated time. The simulated data was created by adding the represented time courses (after convolution with a hemodynamic response function) to random noise.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Results of analyses of simulated data. Thresholded activation maps are overlaid on a gray square using colors as follows: red corresponding to areas that produced the red time course, blue for areas that produced the blue time course, and green indicating areas that matched both time courses. Figures are arranged in a 3‐by‐4 grid where columns are SICA, regression, and TICA results, respectively, and rows are successive experiments. Note that SICA was “successful” in extracting the true answer in experiments (a) and (c), whereas TICA was “successful” in extracting the true answer in experiments (a) and (b). Regression was successful in all cases (to be expected since the exact model is known).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Results of analyses of fMRI data (one subject). Thresholded activation maps for one slice are overlaid on the EPI image using colors as follows: red corresponding to areas that produced the red time course, blue for areas that produced the blue time course, and green indicating areas that matched both time courses. Figures are arranged in a 3‐by‐4 grid where columns are SICA, regression, and TICA results, respectively, and rows are successive experiments. Note that SICA agreed with the regression results in experiments (a) and (c), whereas TICA agreed with the regression results in experiments (a) and (b).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bell AJ, Sejnowski TJ (1995): An information maximisation approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Computation 7: 1129–1159. - PubMed
    1. Biswal BB, Ulmer JL (1999): Blind source separation of multiple signal sources of fMRI data sets using independent component analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23: 265–271. - PubMed
    1. Biswal BB, Van Kylen J, Hyde JS (1997): Simultaneous assessment of flow and BOLD signals in resting‐state functional connectivity maps. NMR Biomed 10: 165–170. - PubMed
    1. Boynton GM, Engel SA, Glover GH, Heeger DJ (1996): Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1. J Neurosci 16: 4207–4221. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Calhoun V, Golay X, Pearlson G (2000a): Improved fMRI slice timing correction: interpolation errors and wrap around effects. In: Proceedings ISMRM, Ninth Annual Meeting, Denver.

LinkOut - more resources