Steward requests/Permissions/2007-06 - Meta Jump to content

Steward requests/Permissions/2007-06

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Administrator access

Latest comment: 17 years ago83 comments45 people in discussion

Uzbek Wikipedia

I request Admin access for Abdulla on Uzbek Wikipedia.

Thank you for attention. Abdulla 07:46, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Done guillom 14:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Romanian Wikisource

I request sysop access for Mvelam on the Romanian Wikisource, as there is no local bureaucrat to grant it.

Thank you. Rebel 18:56, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Done guillom 14:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Cherokee Wiktionary

I request Administrator access for the User:Cherokeekid in Cherokee Wiktionary.

  • Language Code:chr
  • Local Request Link:None?
  • Local User Page:Cherokeekid

Thank you. --Cherokeekid (June 15 2007)

Please make a request to the local community first. If there is no local community, you may request temporary adminship below.--Shanel 04:15, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
There is no local community, so I'm putting a request below for temp. adminship, will I be able to permanentize it later? --Cherokeekid
You can only receive permanent adminship by making a request to the local community; since one does not currently exist, you can only have temporary adminship. That request will be granted.--Shanel 03:43, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Tetum

I request sysop access, but note: I have it yet. I got temporary adminship (see here) which didn't expire.

Thank you. MF-Warburg(de) 17:34, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Done--Shizhao 14:58, 22 June 2007 (UTC)


Novial Wikipedia

A few weeks ago I requested sysop status for Wayne. I was told to hold an election; I waited for people to vote but other than my own vote for my nomination of him and Wayne's vote for himself, nobody else bothered to vote. (See [1]) And the original request seems to have been deleted. What do I do? -- BRG 13:33, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Gah, congratulate him on adminship! Done. MaxSem 15:48, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Akan Wikibooks

I request sysop access.

The only sysop there's inactive, and I need to go in and delete the junk. Thank you. Ralsurr 11:40, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Not done
You can apply for a temp adminship on this page, last section (Temporary permissions for emergency or technical purposes). Thank you,
--M/ 12:03, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Catalan Wikiquote

I request administrator access.

  • Language Code: ca
  • Local Request Link: [2]
  • Local User Page: [3]

Thank you. Ula 13:18, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

As we currently don't have any sysop in wikiquote; maybe better if he becomes a bureaucrat.--Iradigalesc 13:25, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
According to the page, the voting is supposed to continue until May 31 (date set by the candidate himself [4]). That is more than the usual 7 days, considering that the voting started on May 20, but the projects are free to determine the duration of the selection process — and if we were to adhere to the 7 days usual, we'd still be 2 days shy of the deadline. As it stands, however, we will need to wait until May 31.
As for making the user a Bureaucrat, for that to happen there would need to be a vote specific for that end. We cannot use the result of a vote for another position (namely, administrator) to grant the user any other access level. If the local community feels that there should be a local Bureaucrat, please hold a vote locally, and once someone gains consensus to hold that flag, please post the request here. Thank you. Redux 20:03, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
You can made me administrator! Today is May 31. --Ula 19:08, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Done - will do. Congratulations. Effeietsanders 21:13, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Sanskrit Wikipedia

I request sysop access.

Thank you. (The voting has been open since 19th April 2007 and the only voter is the sysop of the project) Eukesh 15:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

When you're admin, could you please remove the sitenotice? Very out of date... MF-Warburg(de) 15:38, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Sure--Eukesh 17:31, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Done--Shanel 20:12, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Igbo Wikipedia

I request sysop access.

Thank you. Voting started May 25 and ended June 1. -- Kerowren 01:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Done — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shanel (talk)

Yiddish Wikipedia

I request sysop access.

  1. This user was sysop already and burocrat. he abused his power day and night to block articles and users which with whom he was in edit fights and he made himself 2 times sysop without votes nor consensus of teling others about it [5]. Danny wool has taken away his power of sysop and bureaucrat because of his abuse. [6]. Please consider that our project is too small to put up with abusers like him. Especially when we have 3 respected sysops who were brought in to replace 20 sysops that were dysyoped only just last month. Danny and Dror. Now he wants to be again sysop without the others who just relinquished their power for peace this is ridicules. I ask all stewards to exercise great caution and responsibility. To not act upon his intention that he says openly to block me. He has no real support in the local wiki thats why he comes here.--יודל 02:07, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Why don't you (concerned users) vote against him on [7] ? We don't decide, if he gets enough support, he'll get promoted. (And I suggest you guys start using symbols like Done and Not done to make things easier for us) drini [es:] [commons:] 03:39, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
We have enough support. but user:זלמן לייב delete all the time this page. so you can see also here. THX Jiddisch 03:49, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I would like to ask to wait for confirmation by Harel, Dror or Dannyisme, as there have been quite some irregularities in this community. I would like to ask them to look at this vote, and if needed, to ask for a checkuser. (See the last vote on the same page, there were sockpuppets used too... ) Further I guess that this vote is only on for a few days, to wait at least a week might be better. Best regards, Effeietsanders 07:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

According to Requests for permissions and Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Yiddish Wikipedia.

User:Jiddisch as Sysop
We have a problem to make this election on our wiki. Because we have not any active admin, and some guy delete that election page all the time. Therfore we orginize it here.


Candidate
Jiddisch 01:07, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Agree

  1. DMY 16:24, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  2. --Jose77 21:32, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  3. --Shmaltz 05:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  4. --[user: Anataderet] I Agree that Grinberg will be the manager of Yiddish_Wikipedia Anataderet 18:51, 3 June 2007 (UTC).
  5. Very importane to grant sysope rights to רוני--אלץ ווייסער 21:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  6. --Joel.m 14:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  7. --Jeo100 17:40, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  8. -- ----Yiddish man 19:49, 4 June 2007 (UTC)74.36.29.130 19:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)I am now, but I am willing to try, I give my vote for רוני I thing he will be a good one.( יודישע שרייבער this voters user page in YIWIKI) me neme in the יודישע וויקיis יודישער שרייבער
  9. -- --Ylebovits 01:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  10. Agree --הרוצה בעילום שמו 16:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  11. --Mechuel 17:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  12. --אלזוז 14:40, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
==This vote has ended. Currently waiting the results should be confirmed==

Disagree

  1. This user was sysop already and burocrat. he abused his power day and night to block articles and users which with whom he was in edit fights and he made himself 2 times sysop without votes nor consensus of teling others about it [8]. Danny wool has taken away his power of sysop and bureaucrat because of his abuse [9]. Please consider that our project is too small to put up with abusers like him. Especially when we have 3 respected sysops who were brought in to replace 20 sysops that were dysyoped only just last month. Danny and Dror. Now he wants to be again sysop without the others who just relinquished their power for peace this is ridicules. I ask all stewards to exercise great caution and responsibility. To not act upon his intention that he says openly to block me. He has no real support in the local wiki thats why he comes here.--יודל 02:07, 3 June 2007 (UTC
  2. I am an avid reader and was once an editor of this Yiddish wiki (different name though) I went through so much trouble to write an objective article about a specific rabbi, רוני\jiddisch kept deleting my changes, facts that I worked so hard to gather, because רוני\jiddisch claimed I didn’t write the proper title for the rabbi and another time he claimed I’m educating the Yiddish speaking public too much, I gave up writing here pretty fast, (I have a job too) I made a vow not to write here until these shenanigans are blocked out, user יודל helped me out a little, but after waisting so many hours on a stupid selfish political objective I realized its not worth it, רוני\jiddisch with all his sockpuppet names and his shenanigan group are well equipped and a lot of money at their disposal to drive their totalitarian agenda, giving this shenanigans power will ultimately be a death sentence for this beautiful yiddish wiki, oddly enough this is the only place a Yiddish speaking person could educate and learn about many different worldly subjects objectively, so the integrity of this wiki is of extreme importance to the Yiddish speaking community, please do not give user רוני\jiddisch sysup or any other power for this wiki…please I’m begging you --Itche Ber 18:11, 3 June 2007 (UTC) see TALK
  3. --Amsgila123 00:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  4. --Yiddish wikipedia 15:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC) this is a low low trick that stinks to high heaven, if all those users who vote pro are realy yiddish wikipedia users where were they just last month when the whole local community voted uninamisly to make 3 new sysops Danny Dror and Harel. This was defenetly a scheam to a low very childish coup to overthrow the privies leadership there. if the Stewards will act on this unprecedented vote to let this happen i think we must realy rethink the duty of a steward. i propose a steward should make himself sysop and enforce whatever he thinks should be enforced by the local wiki votes not votes from here. and give it some time a month is to fast to undo privies votes. remember the community clearly voted to make those 3 new sysops even they are silent and inactive. they are only silent because they probebly deem it right so who are we hwere to undo the will of the local wiki?--Yiddish wikipedia 15:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC) see TALK
  5. i am a frequent user with the info on yiddish wiki, but i wasnt aware he is running here until today, when i opened this site and saw how he trolls for votes [10] he even gives us exect directions how to sign in and vote. he looks very aggressive why should somebody ask other peaple to vote for him in other sites. he may have a large family brought here to help his agenda. but i always thought that wiki is all about a community, and here i see a user stateting clearly that he cannot get elected inside the community thats why he wants the election here. this is a trick that meta should have no part in it. a sysop must represent a community not be forced opun them. and guess what he claims no active sysop in a site that has only 2 users, its that active at all why is this that a sysop was seen there only yesterday called not active[11]--Hetechpetech 17:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
this user never contributed any thing to wiki and he does not even have a user name in any wiki, his vote cannot be counted. by the way "ALL" Of the above Disagree users, are one and the same, he is known in the YI wiki as "זלמן לייב" "יודל" and much more. And more to it, most of the names never even contributed any thing and even more to it, that most of them signed up after the vote started. Its one and the same user trying to manipulate the outcome of the vote. we just need to be blind not to see how 1 user can sabotage the entire community.--Joel.m 18:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
==This vote has ended. Currently waiting the results should be confirmed==

TALK
the user user:Yiddish wikipedia was registered after the votes was started and he should be ignored see this [12]--Jeo100 15:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

most of the users sighend on page were signd in after the vote started if u call this a vote then make rulls who should vote and who not. dont just be selective--Yiddish wikipedia 15:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

All of the Disagree section + Mechuel are probebly the same guy. please run a chack-user. Jiddisch 15:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

All other users except “user:Yiddish wikipedia” and “Itche Ber” where users in other Wikipedia’s before the vote started. The "user:יודל" tried first to add himself (as a Candidate, after most of the Agree vote was already in!!!) when he saw it doesn’t work, he starting registering new username to vandalize the votes --Jeo100 15:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Since user information on META is different then on wiki YI, users cannot log in here with there regular user name and passwords and are forced to create a new account for META.
Any voter over here should have on his META user page a link to his user page at YI:wiki.
Signing up today in META is not a problem as long as he was a active member in YI:wiki, for example user:Yiddish wikipedia was signd up on YI:wiki just today. --Joel.m 15:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Look what Yidel did with his second user name Amsgila123 here, This gay is disgusting (sorry for the impression)--Joel.m 17:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

grmbl
It lookt like it is going the old, usual way... All disruptive conversations, nobody cares about setting clear regulations. I would very much appreciate it if I could speak with someone this day on IRC (try http://javachat.wikipedia.be . you will go to the #wikipedia-nl channel. Then type /join #wikipedia-yi . I will be there, but it might take a time before i respond) to work out a solution. This is because it is not ok to have a vote like this on meta, besides a few practical problems. I would like to suggest and come up with a few clear rules for further votes, elections etc, on which first could be voted for instance. I know you are trying to do your best, and I would as much as you do want to see that the yiddish Wikipedia becomes somewhat more active. Best regards, Effeietsanders 07:54, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Catalan Wikibooks

Hello! We have a problem in Catalan language Wikibooks. The sysop Vedranell (ca:b:User:Vedranell) created a new account called Álvaro_M (ca:b:User:Álvaro_M) when Special:Renameuser still did not exist because of the conflicts that he had with other usernames in some Wikimedia projects. Since then he has only used the second account, and when he had to do some administrator job he had to log out and enter with his old name. He says that there is no problem in this but I have finally convinced him to talk to you in order to know if there is any way to help him. I know that it is impossible to merge the two accounts but you could probably remove the sysop access to his old account and give it to his new one so that he can leave his old accunt and not use it any more. He can do dummy edits with his two accounts if you need to verify that they belong to the same person. Thank you.

Thank you again. --SMP (talk page) 19:01, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Please ask him to make an edit with each account confirming this request and that they belong to the same person. —{admin} Pathoschild 22:33:46, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Done. Here you have the diffs [13] [14]. Remember that he does not speak English ;-) --SMP (talk page) 12:19, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Done--Shanel 20:24, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Turkish Wikipedia

I need two Turkish Wikipedia users sysop-ed. They both had successfull RFAs, however our only bureaucrat Dbl2010, who is also a steward, has been busy for some time; so they need to be given the privileges that they have deserved.

The names of the users are tr:User:Mach and tr:User:İnfoCan. The RFA pages are as follows:

I am also an admin on tr.wp and i hereby verify that they had successfull RFAs.

Thank you very much in advance.

Vito Genovese 18:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, but Not done. There are many votes against both these people. You need a local bureaucrat speaking your language to close the election with respect of your local policies; stewards can't decide, and these cases are not obvious. Dbl2010 may be not active on the wiki, but I know he reads his emails, so let him decide. I'd also suggest someone else requests bureaucrat access, so as to avoid waiting for less active users. guillom 18:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
I have emailed Dbl2010 through the stewards' mailing list, he should deal with these RfAs soon. guillom 18:45, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Hakka Wikipedia

I request sysop access.

Thank you. --Hakka 10:26, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Please allow at least 7 days for the other users to express their opinions. Thank you. --Paginazero - Ø 13:33, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Done--Shizhao 13:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Bahasa Melayu

I request sysop access for ms:User:Aeonimitz.

Thank you. ms:User:Didie 02:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Done--Dbl2010 03:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
We have our own Bureaucrat here at ms wiki. User should be appointed by the local Bureaucrat. Master2841 10:06, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Well, no harm done anyway. Please, make sure that somewhere on ms.wiki (the votation page, maybe?) is written that flag requests must be addressed to the local bureaucrats, so that users won't post their request here again. Thank you. --Paginazero - Ø 16:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes but if the appointment is done here then there is no way the appointment will show up in the local user rights log. Desysoping is required so that the user can be appointed by the local bureaucrat. Master2841 16:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

The appointment is actually recorded on meta log only. Is that such a big problem that requires a desysopping and subsequent sysopping? Please, let's stick to common sense and to what is useful for the wiki. And let's take measures so that such a (not so severe IMHO) mistake won't occur again. --Paginazero - Ø 17:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Thats my faul. I should have checked first if there is a local bureaucrat. I didn' mean to overpower or anything. --Dbl2010 22:12, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Albanian Wiktionary

I request Administrator access for the User:Zeke in Albanian Wiktionary.

Thank you. --Puntori (12:03, 14 June 2007 (UTC))

Done
--M/ 12:33, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

hr.wikibooks

I request sysop access for user dtom on hr wikibooks

Thank you. SpeedyGonsales 18:29, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Done
--M/ 12:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Tigrinya Wikipedia

I request sysop access for translating the entire interface but no bureaucrats.

Thank you. --ቶጎሩባ 13:35, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Not done - you do not seem to have the local community support. --Paginazero - Ø 06:37, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Mongolian Wikipedia

I request sysop access for User:Timur on Mongolian Wikipedia.

Thankyou. --Jose77 23:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Done drini [es:] [commons:] 12:36, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Ukrainian Wiktionary

Please grant the admin status to wikt:uk:Користувач:Minia.

  • Language Code: uk
  • Local Request Link: [15]
  • Local User Page: Minia
Done guillom 19:01, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Myanmar (Burmese) Wikipedia

I hereby request sysop access for User:MyMyanmar on Burmese Wikipedia.

Thankyou. --Jose77 09:40, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Done --Paginazero - Ø 07:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Corsican Wikipedia

I request sysop access on Corsican Wikipedia. The other (and only) local sysop agrees.

  • Language Code: co
  • Local Request Link: none
  • List of local bureaucrats: no bureaucrats
  • Local User Page: co:User:Ale Mister

Thank you. 29 June 2007

It should be the whole community of users to agree, not only the other sysop. Please link a page where you can show to have the support of the local community. --Paginazero - Ø 11:24, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Done, situation explained here. --Paginazero - Ø 16:16, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Ewe Wikipedia

I humbly request sysop access for User:Natsubee on Ewe Wikipedia.

Thankyou. --Jose77 01:04, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Done drini [es:] [commons:] 00:20, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

Latest comment: 17 years ago32 comments18 people in discussion

Banyumasan Wikipedia

I am borgx from map-bms Wikipedia. The community of map-bms has agree to appoint me and Meursault2004 as the first bureaucrates of map-bms Wikipedia. Although the community is still small but we want to have the freedom to manage our Wikipedia on our self. Please consider this request.

Thank you. Borgx 07:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

@map-bmswiki is Bad interwiki username?--Shizhao 15:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
What do you mean by Bad interwiki username? Borgx 08:58, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Done. Shizhao : the prefix for user rights is map_bms :) guillom 14:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Bulgarian Wikipedia

Per local RfA. The project is already relatively big but has only one bureaucrat.

Thank you. --Nk 12:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Since there is a local bureaucrat, you must ask him to give you the tools using the bg:Special:Makesysop special page. guillom 19:01, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Sorry. It's already done. --Nk 11:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Ukrainian Wikinews

Please grant the bureaucrat status to n:uk:Користувач:A1 (local bureaucrat is inactive since September 2006)

  • Language Code: uk
  • Local Request Link: [16]
  • Local User Page: A1

Done! Ausir 21:18, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Asturian Wikipedia

Asturian Wikipedia has 5 sysops but no bureaucrat. Esbardu is sysop in asturian wikipedia and wiktionary.

Thank you. --1297 15:39, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

It has been 7 days, but Esbardu has received only one vote. Can the election be run for a little while longer?--Shanel 16:57, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
It has been 19 days now. Do you think it is enough time for voting? Thanks in advance --Esbardu 23:32, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
[17] ? Regrdless, support was received , so Done drini [es:] [commons:] 12:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Italian Wiktionary

Per local RfA. Current bureaucrat Sabine is offline and unreachable since a month

Thank you. --Nick1915 - all you want 12:46, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Done --Paginazero - Ø 12:54, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Hebrew Wikibooks

I request bureaucrat rights in Hebrew Wikibooks (hewikibooks). There was a vote here (in the village pump), started at 10 June and finished at 17 June. There is almost no community, thus only one user (except for me) participated. Since the current bureaucrats are inactive, I ask it here.

Summary:

In the same vote, it was decided to grant sysop rights to b:he:User:Mintz l. Please also do that.

Thank you. – rotemliss – Talk 13:57, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

One of the bureaucrats was active at the beginning of June he:b:Special:Contributions/Gadial. Please ask him to process the RfA/RfB. guillom 14:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
He was active for a few days for the discussion (in his talk page) about the appointment, but he recently became inactive in all the projects. In this discussion, he expressed no objection. The other user requested him to add the permissions after the vote ended (8 days ago), but he didn't answer. – rotemliss – Talk 16:24, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Ok, Done for you bureaucratship. As for the sysopship of b:he:User:Mintz l, you can now give him/her the tools through he:b:Special:Makesysop. guillom 16:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Northern Sami Wikipedia

After you suggested se.wikipedia should vote on which users should be bureaucrats there so was done. Skuolfi, Yupik and Trondtr agreed to be bureaucrats [18]. All votes was for the three candidates. This is a good long time since now, but no one has done anything more about it. Could you make se:user:Skuolfi, se:user:Yupik and se:user:Trondtr bureaucrats? --Jorunn 23:30, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Done Angela 00:04, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Malayalam Wikipedia

I would like to bring to your notice that there has been an election for the beurocrat position in ml:wikipedia. The beurocrat position was empty for a week since ml:User:manjithkaini resigned his post. The election was started on 17 May 2007 and it is closed today. Check the below links and see the voting status. Please grant the user ml:User:Vssun beurocrat access. Currently he is a sysop in malayalam wiki.

here's the link of the polling booth if the above din't show

Many thanks and let the light be on --Challiyan 13:36, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Request re arrange by --Jigesh 16:06, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Done drini [es:] [commons:] 13:53, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Indonesian Wikibooks

Indonesian Wikibooks has no bureaucrat and only one sysop. We are nominating id:b:User:Borgx (the current sysop) to be our first bureaucrat. We believe that he will be able to perform the task since he has already been appointed as a bureaucrat in id.wikipedia and has got the trust from our community.

Thank you. ivanlanin ♫ 20:44, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Please wait for a week to give everybody the opportunity to state his/her opinion. Effeietsanders 13:14, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
It's been one week. Please process this request. Thanks Borgx 00:28, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Done--Shanel 17:20, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Indonesian Wikiquote

Indonesian Wikiquote has no bureaucrat and only one sysop. We are nominating id:q:User:Borgx (the current sysop) to be our first bureaucrat. We believe that he will be able to perform the task since he has already been appointed as a bureaucrat in id.wikipedia and has got the trust from our community.

Thank you. ivanlanin ♫ 20:44, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Same as above Effeietsanders 13:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
It's been one week. Please process this request. Thanks Borgx 00:28, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Done--Shanel 17:21, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

CheckUser access

Latest comment: 17 years ago14 comments11 people in discussion

Italian Wikipedia

Please grant checkuser status to it:Utente:Madaki, due to election results ended 65/10/7. Thank you. --.anaconda 12:14, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Seen. I endorse this request and wait for another Steward. --M/ 11:15, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Done, please don't forget to read my email. MaxSem 11:38, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Bosnian Wikipedia

I request checkuser access for bs:User:Demicx and bs:User:Kal-El

Thank you. Elmir[demicx] 14:04, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Not done, as CheckUser policy requires at least 25-30 votes. MaxSem 14:40, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Bosnian Wikipedia

Please give CheckUser status to the following two users:

You can see our voting here.. --BiH 21:43, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Done Jon Harald Søby 21:27, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Commons

My RFCU has been open for 7 days now. It has received 28 votes in support and none against, I therefore request checkuser rights on Commons.

Thanks. Herby talk thyme 11:27, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Done Jon Harald Søby 09:30, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Hebrew Wikipedia

Hi, Please give the following two users checkuser status:

They have reached the needed specifications in this vote. They can be contacted on their talk pages, they both understand English. Thanks, Yonidebest 17:24, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Also, while you at it, please remove the sysop and checkuser status of Felagund who has retired (see diff). Thanks, Yonidebest 17:36, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Done for all three.--Shanel 17:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
As you can see there, he only requested removal of sysops rights, not the checkuser rights. The Relativity of The Truth 17:55, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
As you can see in his talk page, he already announced he removes the checkuser rights. – rotemliss – Talk 17:57, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Oversight access

Removal of rights

Latest comment: 17 years ago102 comments51 people in discussion

Italian Wikiversity

Please remove temporary sysop access, user do not want to be reconfirmed.

Thank you. Skyluke 11:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Can either an italian steward check that either that he confirms it in english? Thanks, Effeietsanders 18:17, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Confirmed. The user has been temporarily flagged and his sysophood expired. Thank you. --Paginazero - Ø 18:32, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Done guillom 14:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Italian Wikiversity

Please remove temporary sysop access, user do not want to be reconfirmed.

Thank you. Skyluke 11:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Same as above. Effeietsanders 18:17, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Same as above... Thank you. --Paginazero - Ø 18:32, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Done guillom 14:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Chinese Wikipedia

zh:User:向柏霖 is an admin on the Chinese Wikipedia, but he has been inactive since 26th July 2006 - almost 11 months already. According to zh:Wikipedia:管理員的離任, admins who have not editted an article for 6 months (plus a 1-month notification period) will have their sysop access removed. Please kindly de-sysop this user. Thank you. --Computor 18:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

I understand there is a notification period. Do you have notified him/her first? Effeietsanders 18:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
I haven't, but Jnlin, another administrator of the Chinese Wikipedia, has already left the notification on his talk page on 10 May 2007. There have been no responses ever since.--Computor 19:28, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Done--Shizhao 15:09, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

English Wikipedia

I'm rarely active in the project anymore, I have no need for the tools. See my english user page, and the history for my confimation, my computer has a right click problem so cant paste. Thanks. Jaranda 169.139.19.193 16:16, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Done. Fantasy 容 10:40, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Arabic Wikipedia

Please remove my sysop status in the Arabic Wikipedia --Aram33 13:14, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Please confirm it on your local talk page on ar.wikipedia. guillom 14:42, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
look at the bottom of this page please [20] --Aram33 08:10, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Done guillom 14:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Hebrew Wikipedia

Please remove my sysop status in the Hebrew Wikipedia. [21]. Yonidebest 18:31, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Done. MaxSem 18:33, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Italian Wikipedia

Please remove sysop status to Paulatz, user asked the removal of sysop status in his user page on it.wiki.

Thank you. --Snowdog 15:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Done guillom 14:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

English Wikipedia

en:User:H is leaving Wikipedia because of real life harassment. He has requested desysopping. Here is the link.[22]

Thank you. ElinorD 14:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Done Effeietsanders 18:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Користувач:Movses

I feel that I'm not admin :) Please unsysop me. (Confirmation here.)

Done. Увы:( MaxSem 14:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

English Wikipedia

User:Robth

I have very little time for Wikipedia right now, and would prefer to spend what time I have focusing on the fun stuff. That being the case, I'd like to have the tools removed so that I'm not distracted by the massive piles of tedious backlog work that they always call out to me to work on. Robth 17:42, 10 June 2007 (UTC) (Confirmation here.)

Done
--M/ 17:44, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Turkish wikipedia

As of beeing Dbl2010@trwiki I want to resign from bureaucrat and admin status. Thanks in advance. --Dbl2010 02:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Done drini [es:] [commons:] 06:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

ja:User:Gleam

He has sysopship and was/is inactive over 3 months. Accoding to ja:Wikipedia:管理者の辞任(de-sysopship),we request removal his sysops access. see the discussion ja:Wikipedia:管理者の辞任#管理者の自動退任. Thank you.--Bellcricket 03:30, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Done Jon Harald Søby 04:12, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Uzbek Wikipedia

Please remove Azim's admin status due to the lack of contributions in 2007. Since there's no active community in Uzbek Wikipedia, there is no discussion page. --Abdulla 15:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC).

Malay Wikipedia

Aeonimitz has informed the Malay Wikipedia Community that he wishes to step down as an Administrator there. [23] Master2841 17:22, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Done guillom 19:01, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Italian Wiktionary

Broc

At present it.wiktionary isn't a free dictionary. Details wikt:it:Utente:Broc. --151.44.157.207 18:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Done Since you have confirmed it on your local userpage. guillom 19:01, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Illy@enwikisource

Please remove Illy@enwikisource's administrator access per the confirmation discussion, which failed due to inactivity (administrator policy, bureaucrat's decision). —{admin} Pathoschild 14:48:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Done --Paginazero - Ø 09:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

English Wikipedia

Please remove my administrator access from en.wikipedia as I am resigning there. See [24], [25]. Thanks. Pilotguy radar contact 18:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Done--Shanel 03:21, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Italian Wiktionary 2

Federico

I voluntary resign. [26] [27] Thanks. 87.14.154.159 21:43, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Done Jon Harald Søby 04:10, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Bosnian Wikipedia

I request removal of my check user status from user Emir Kotromanić according to my own request in Bosnian Wikipedia, because I don't agree with the resolution of the board about personal information: [28].

--Emir Kotromanić 20:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

The request will mean also that the other checkuser is going to lose his flag, since WMF policies currently allow a minimum of two checkusers. --M/ 21:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Done
The other Checkuser has been informed. --M/ 21:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
--M/ 21:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Russian Wikipedia

In compliance with the decision of the Russian Wikipedia Arbitration Commitee, I request to remove the 'sysop' flag from user St0rm because of his low activity and by mutual consent [30].

--Ptr ru 15:44, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Done
--M/ 18:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

English Wikipedia

Requesting temporary removal of sysop access in order to concentrate on off-wiki stuff.

Thank you :) riana_dzasta 12:16, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Done
--M/ 18:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Dutch Wikipedia

Please remove my sysop acces on nl.wikipedia.

Thanks in advance. Cheers, NielsF 17:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Done
--M/ 17:56, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Icelandic Wikipedia

is:User:Sauðkindin is a bot account that hasn't been active since 2005, it was also given sysop powers by its creator at the time so it could perform maintainance on protected pages. It seems this isn't allowed anymore (bot accounts with admin priveliges) and since it hasn't been used anyways for a long time, could you guys remove the adminship from it. It's creator is:Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason has stated that he's ok with it as well. --Biekko 15:01, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

See Taka réttindi af sauðkindinni for his approval, both in Icelandic and English. -- Steinninn 219.121.89.169 17:05, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Done--Shanel 20:40, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Malay Wikipedia

Due to inactivity. Discussion here. Both sysop and bureaucrat. ...Aurora... 10:35, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Done, looks ok, no activity since 2006. Fantasy 容 08:29, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Italian WIktionary

Fede_Reghe

At present it.wiktionary isn't a dictionary free. Details in my user page (it) --Fede Reghe 13:49, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Done. Fantasy 容 07:59, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
SabineCretella

Read here

Done. Fantasy 容 07:59, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

English Wikipedia

Filiocht

In accordance with an external email, stating this user was no longer participating in Wikipedia, I have removed oversight access. This is in advance of the Board Resolution requirement. Should this user wish to decide to return to Wikipedia, and provide proof of identity, I believe we may immediately restore access.

I am adding this information here for record-keeping purposes. Cary Bass demandez 17:25, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Vancouverguy

Compromised admin account (see [34]). Removed access.

I am adding this information here for record-keeping purposes. Cary Bass demandez 15:56, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Icelandic Wikipedia

Notandi:Ice201

This user has resigned from the Icelandic Wikipedia, see here and here. He also removed himself from the manually updated list of admins, see here. --Biekko 21:33, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Done -- Fantasy 容 10:02, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Notandi:Amgine

This user appears on our automatic administrator log, it has no contributions and was not made admin by any local bureaucrat. I have no idea why he/she was made an admin and why the Icelandic community wasn't consulted about it. --Biekko 21:33, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

When looking through the Steward-logs, I found this line:
  • 08:38, 21 June 2006 Sj (Talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Amgine@iswiki from (none) to sysop
But on that date there have been a lot of userrights set for this user. I could not find in the Archive a reason for this user rights... :-(
In view of all the userrights things done for this user, this seems to a simple mistake, I removed the sysop right now, sorry for this inconvenience, and thanks for letting us know :-) Fantasy 容 10:02, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
I would guess it was for some editing purpose for instance to edit the sitenotice or another mediawiki message and that Sj indeed just forgot to remove the bit. Effeietsanders 10:28, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Slovak Wikipedia

I request removal of sysop and bureaucrat access for user Liso.

On May 24, 2007, Slovak Wikipedia admin and bureaucrat Liso initiated a vote to confirm himself in his position. Vote ended on June 7, 2007. The result was 13 supporting, 7 opposing and 4 neutral users. The archived vote can be found at w:sk:Wikipédia:Žiadosť_o_práva_správcu/Liso_(potvrdenie).

Please note, that a procedure for adminship confirmation is currently not defined on sk.wikipedia and this was only second confirmation (following shortly after the first one), and the first one to fail. The requirement for promoting a new user to admin is 2/3 support (Voting with 1 option, this is commonly used as a rule for new adminships):

"(2) Návrh je schválený, ak získa aspoň 10 platných hlasov. Na schválenie návrhu je potrebná dvoj-tretinová väčšina alebo jednoduchá väčšina. Akú väčšinu je potrebné získať, sa stanoví pre každý druh hlasovania osobitne.
a) Dvoj-tretinová väčšina: Návrh je schválený, ak pomer kladných a záporných hlasov je väčší alebo rovný 2.""

Translation:

"(2) Suggestion is accepted if it gains at least 10 valid votes. To be accepted, it must gain at least 2/3 majority or simple majority. Which one applied will be specified for each type of vote separately.
a) 2/3 support: Suggestion is accepted if ratio of positive and negative votes is equal or larger than 2."

So this can be implied for self-requested confirmation. (in addition Liso as one of the first admins never passed any community vote except for checkuser vote).

Moreover, Liso himself explicitly declared in discussion to the vote:

"Pokial neziskam do 7. juna 2/3 (aj ked by sa dali spekulovat rozne vyklady) podporu sam poziadam nejakeho stewarda o odobratie prav."

Translation:

"If I don't get 2/3 support until June 7 (even if one could speculate different interpretations), I will ask a steward for de-adminship myself."

At the time he made that statement, his support was 10 vs. 9 opposing. On June 7, 2007, he wrote a concusion to the vote, where he said he needs to think about further steps [35]. No further steps in this matter happened as of this writing, despite I noticed him of further procedure (requesting de-adminship at meta) at the same page and later at his talk page ([36]). He resumed regular Wikipedia edits, including admin edits (bot flag added, June 10 and others).

Therefore I request to remove the admin and bureaucrat rights of Liso at Slovak Wikipedia. ~~helix84 09:52, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Please, don‘t believe him, there is NO RULE "The requirement for promoting a new user to admin is 2/3 support" in sk wiki. Mr. Helix can dream about that. Any statement of Liso in discussion has no influence to his admin and bureaucrat rights.--Kelovy 10:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

It is true, there is no reason to remove admin rights of Liso (there was no confirmation of burreaucrat rights either, only sysop rights) and I don't know about 2/3 requirement. --Wizzard 10:54, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

I hope you could see that helix84's asking is "non-standard" asking in other's name... :( It is more complicated. Or simple. Even I got what I declarated I want (2/3 support (18 voices against 9)) I asked time for my reaction because I like to try to find best solution for our wiki. My words was my own plans and helix84 has not any right (nor any rule in sk.wiki gives him rigth to ask my desysop) to ask for my desysop. But although I got what I asked I am still thinking about asking desysop because I am prepared sacrifice my sysop rights to gain stability and prosperity of our wiki. But! :/ I am not sure that it is best thing to keep admins who makes steps like helix84 here to admin our wiki... So please be patient! I hope we will find soulution in our wiki... (sorry my poor english) --Liso 10:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

@Liso: The best solution is to keep your word. Bureaucrauts should be honest people. If you want time to think, you should specify a time-limit. Endless thinking and using rights is unfair.
There are also several points:
  • Liso has never gained support for his sysop and bureaucrat status by Slovak community. He was promoted directly by a steward. (from ordinary user to bureaucrat in two days [37])
  • Liso voluntarily started an official vote, on an official local page for RfA, not a private poll, which he can use to decide himself. There is a ratified rule for votes on Slovak Wikipedia.
  • @Kelovy. Your claim there is NO RULE "The requirement for promoting a new user to admin is 2/3 support is not true.
    • It is said in the head of Slovak RfA page sk:Wikipédia:Žiadosť o práva správcu (Liso wrote it :-), see [38]):
      Táto stránka je určená pre hľadanie konsenzu pri menovaní adminov na slovenskej wiki. Precízne pravidlá nie sú formulované, predpokladá sa fair prístup.
      Translation: This page is intended for finding consenzus in promoting administrators on Slovak wiki. Accurate rules are not formulated, fair approach is assumed.
    • The relevant rule, sk:Wikipédia:Pravidlá/Hlasovanie declares:
      Toto pravidlo určuje spôsob akým sa na slovenskej Wikipédii hlasuje o návrhoch. Vzťahuje sa na všetky hlasovania, ak osobitné pravidlo nestanovuje inak.
      Translation: This rule determines method how to vote about proposals on Slovak Wikipedia. It is aplied to all votes unless a special rule specifies otherwise.
      There is no special rule, hence sk:Wikipédia:Pravidlá/Hlasovanie should be applied.
    • Rule sk:Wikipédia:Pravidlá/Hlasovanie gives two options how to interpret vote results. Simple majority or 2/3 majority. But there is required a consensus on sk:Wikipédia:Žiadosť o práva správcu (see translation above). Simple majority cannot be called as consensus, so 2/3 is required.
--Beren 13:34, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Interesting view :) As Helix wrote above, our official rule contains text: Which one applied will be specified for each type of vote separately. For this kind of voting majority was never specified, so due to logic it was required same ratio as in previous admin rights votings (for example my successful defending - with result 16:14). (Unofficial) words about consensus can everybody understand according his wishes. Kelovy 20:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

I made decision. Please remove my admin flag and keep my bureaucrat flag! Thanx! --195.91.54.85 04:47, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Sorry I was not signed and was hurry to see preview... --Liso 06:00, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Not doneA bureaucrat flag can not be kept while no admin generally. Please consider that. A little above here you can request a desysop when you give a link to a confirmation of that request with your skwiki account. Effeietsanders 10:33, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Well. Sorry for that! There was a processing error in sk.wiki so we have to solve it there. Thanx! --Liso 11:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
The void, technically unachievable request for access removal of Liso, which he calls processing error doesn't change anything about the result of vote.
The only "solution" Liso did at sk.wikipedia was to declare the vote null and void [39] because, as he claims, he didn't know admin rights are a prequisite for bureaucrat rights. This step was afterwards contested by AtonX, Mz and RuM(=beren) [40] and the archived vote was kept unchanged. Did he know or not, ignorantia juris non excusat should be applied.
Liso is notorious for giving vague statements. He didn't specify any deadline for resolution. Therefore I suggest stewards to give him another 24 hours (until 10:33, 14 June 2007 UTC) to correct his error by asking for removal of admin and bureaucrat flags and placing a note in English on his local user talk page. I notified him of this procedure twice before he made the request (links in my original request). If this doesn't happen, a steward should consider my original request above. ~~helix84 14:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
I hope that non-standard asking in my name without my approve is simply enough reason to be careful not to believe all what is helix84 saying. In our wikipedia is still continuing open discussion about this question. And I propose to be patient and wait for results. I dont plan to discuss in this page because I dont want to disturb this community with our problems. So please ask me on sk.wiki before any action or if you have any question. Or contact me on ICQ - 279374498 Thanx! --Liso 16:08, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

As Liso contested my right to ask in his name, I will cite Requests_for_permissions#Removal_of_access:

To request the removal of another user's status, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first.

and w:sk:Wikipédia:Hlasovanie#O_povahe_konsenzu (Wikipedia:Voting#Nature of consensus), which has a formal status of recommendation:

Ak je absolútne nutné použiť nejaké formálne pravidlá čo je to konsenzus, pri súčasnej veľkosti Wikipédie možno za dôkaz širokej zhody považovať hlasovanie dvojtretinovej väčšiny.
Ak ide o závažnejšie hlasovania s následkami trvalého charakteru, môže byť požadovaná ešte širšia podpora až 75 % hlasujúcich.
Za ukazovateľa panujúcej zhody nemožno považovať prostú väčšinu.

Translation:

If it's absolutely necessary to use a formal rule about what is consensus, considering current size of Wikipedia, a vote od 2/3 majority can be considered a proof of broad consent.
If the vote is of serious nature with permanent consequences, even wider support of 75 % can be required.
Simple majority cannot be considered an indicator of consensus.

Liso also says you shouldn't believe what I say. I do not ask to be believed, I provide evidence for everything I claim. If in any case further evidence needed, I will provide it on request. ~~helix84 03:15, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Formal status, lol :))) This recomendation was translated from cs wiki by user Bubamara short time ago (same like many other "recommendations") and she didn‘t ask somebody for consent. Please, respect our OFFICIAL RULES, not such interesting translated texts. --Kelovy 17:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Not done - Please come to consensus in the community or let Liso request it himself in a correct way. As far as I am concerned, the discussion is closed here. Please file a new request when there are new arguments or there is a new situation. Effeietsanders 20:59, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Russian Wikipedia

User:DaeX

Decision of Arbitration Committee: Remove CheckUser status because of inactivity. --ajvol 15:54, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Done Cary Bass demandez 16:05, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
User:Ramir

In accordance with ru-wiki Arbitration committee decision Ι request to remove sysop rights from ru:Участник:Ramir because of harsh abuse of administrator's power. Solon 10:41, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Done. Yann 11:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Portuguese Wikipedia

Usuário:OS2Warp

Please, remove my status sysop. See:[41] --OS2Warp 20:47, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Done. MaxSem 20:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Lithuanian-language Wikipedia

I ask for removing my sysop status in Lithuanian wikipedia. I don't want to stay with dictatorship-mode sysops like Knutux, Dirgela and Nomad who destroy all community.

Thank you. Hugo.arg 08:43, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Done drini [es:] [commons:] 23:48, 29 June 2007 (UTC)


  • I want to remove my sysop rights in Lithuanian Wikipedia. I don't want to stay with other sysops community, especialy nomad, dirgela and knutux, where are a lot of irritation, dictatorship, ructions, abuses, etc. I think, I

can work my interest job in wikipedia without sysop rights. My contribution [44]

  • Language Code:lt
  • Local Request Link: [45]
  • Local User Page:[46]

Thank you. --Algirdas (June 20 2007)

Done -- although this should have been posted on the Romoval of access section. I have considered this edit as evidence that Algirdas does indeed want to give up his tools on lt.wiki. Sysop status removed. Redux 17:50, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

en.wiki and meta

User:Naconkantari, en:User:Naconkantari. I have had enough of this silliness. Naconkantari 21:35, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Done drini [es:] [commons:] 23:51, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

French-language Wikipedia

fr:User:Bibi Saint-Pol has resigned from this sysop status.

Thank you. guillom 12:53, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Done. MaxSem 12:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Icelandic Wikiquote

User Amgine was made a sysop apparently only to change the sitenotice message as that is its only edit. I assume this was a temporary sysop and that nobody cared to remove the priveliges when the task was done. --Biekko 17:22, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Agreed, Done. guillom 10:08, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Norwegian Wikipedia

I'd like to have my administratorship in Norwegian Wikipedia removed. [47]. Ulflarsen 09:30, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Done drini [es:] [commons:] 03:00, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Finnish Wikipedia

I'd like to have my administratorship in Finnish Wikipedia removed. [48] --Myrtti 06:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Done. guillom 10:08, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Meta

Bcorr (talk · contribs · CA) failed reconfirmation in September 2006, though his status was not removed (please see the following diffs: [49], [50]). Korg + + 02:28, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Done. MaxSem 05:45, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Temporary permissions

Latest comment: 17 years ago37 comments20 people in discussion

Dzognka Wikipedia

I reuqest that a steward gives sysop rights to himself on dz: (no community) to clean up the dz:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion. --MF-Warburg 12:13, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Done drini [es:] [commons:] 14:12, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Oromo Wiktionary

I request sysop access.

Spam needs to be deleted. Just a few days is good. Thank you. Picaroon (Talk) 19:49, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Done
27 May 2007 20:53 changed group membership for User:Picaroon9288@omwiktionary from (none) to sysop: Temp sysop flag, as per request on meta:Requests_for_permissions, valid for 1 week (expires June 3 2007)
--M/ 19:56, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Expired and revoked. --Dbl2010 03:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Inuktitut Wikipedia

I would like to request permanent sysop status for iu:User:Qrc2006. He has recently revived the Inuktitut language edition and is the only active user who speaks Inuktitut. He has since put great efforts into turning what was a collection of sub-stubs into something that could one day become a real encyclopaedia. At present, the only other sysop iu:User:Thogo is absent and this situation might continue for a while, during which spam keeps accumulating on that Wiki. I have asked him, whether he would agree to volunteer as admin [51], and he has agreed. [52] Since he is the only active user (except for Thogo, Steinbach and me, who just help a little bit but do not understand any Inuktitut), holding regular admin elections makes very little sense.--Johannes Rohr 21:06, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Language Code: iu
  • Local Request Page: (none)
  • Local User Page: iu:User:Qrc2006.
Done - for three months. If no other active fluent speakers turn up in that time, we can consider making him a permanent sysop. Regards — Dan | talk 16:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Expires 1 June 2007
Expired and revoked. --Dbl2010 03:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Wikibooks Alemannics

I request sysop access.

I would like request sysop access for a year, because the Wikibooks Alemannics has just started in january 2007, and then I can better to build the Alemannic Wikibooks. The Wikibooks has only one sysop. There are a problem, because there are some pages, that should deleted, and anybody can delete those pages.

I need the admin rights to be able to use the transwiki import from German Wikibooks and German Wikipedia to the Alemanics wikibooks, the text will be translated in Alemannics from the Alemannics Users...I didn't request the temporarily one because I think I will need it again.. Thank you.Greifensee 22:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Please gain consensus in your community, and apply for normal adminship. Effeietsanders 09:52, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Greifensee: Import ist Standardmässig nicht eingeschaltet. Du brauchst dazu Adminstatus und musst die Entwickler bitten es dir freizuschalten. Ein andere Lösung wäre die Benutzergruppe import, aber ich bin nicht der Meinung das das eine gute Idee ist.
Greifensee: Import is not active by default. You need adminship and you must ask a developer for enable it. An other solution is the user group import, but I dont think that this is a good idea.
Effeietsanders: Which comunity? At the moment you speak to all active members of the alemannic wikibooks community (I mean User Greifensee), see b:als:Spezial:Letzte Änderungen.
-- MichaelFrey 16:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

I asked Civvi to report only to me the IP of a moving page vandal for the it.wiki. This is an anti-vandalism emergency measure, and I have checked for any present CU and/or bureaucrat on #wikipedia-it IRC channel in advance. --M/ 23:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

I am an administrator on the Alemannic Wikipedia (als:Benutzer:Chlämens) and support Greifensee's request for Admin-status. He seems to be the main [only?] person interested in getting the project off the ground and should be given all the help he needs to do so. The Alemannic Wikipedia is the umbrella project for the other Alemannic-language projects anyway (none of which are active yet), so community support would mean community support on Wikipedia. --Clemens 03:27, 27 February 2007 (UTC) Fetter Text

Done granted initially for 3 months. User is the most active on wiki and the only current administrator has made just 2 edits in 6 months. Please come back after the time expires and tell us about your work. Expires 1 June 2007 drini [es:] [commons:] 01:37, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

thank you! Greifensee 06:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)


There is a problem, because I can't make Inter-Wikis, could you please show, what's the reason is, that I can't make Import?

That are written, when I want make an Import:


Seiten importieren Us Wikibooks Hops zue: Navigation, Suech Für den Transwiki-Import sind keine Quellen definiert. Das direkte Hochladen von Versionen ist gesperrt.

Vun "http://als.wikibooks.org/wiki/Spezial:Importieren"

Greifensee 07:44, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

@Greifensee:
RTFM I wrote the reason (it's not enabled by default) and the solution (ask a Developer)
But: I don't think that this is a good idea, because the alemanisch Wikibooks is at the moment the german wikibooks translated into alemenic ... Including technichal texts (I'm an technician student in switzerland and can tell, nobody read or write such textes in alemanic ...), rules, conventions, candidats for deletion and so on ...
-- MichaelFrey 17:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Expired and revoked. --Dbl2010 03:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Corsican

I request sysop access. I'm the co:User:Santista1982. The Corsican Wikipedia don't have a administrator and need it urgently because have many and many articles to delete and need other things.

Thank you. 89.101.196.12 14:02, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

A temp adminship is granted for three months (expires 2007 06 03), but I recommend that you create your user page on the local wiki and setup a sysop election page.
Done
--M/ 14:11, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Expired and revoked. --Dbl2010 03:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Turkmen Wikibooks and Turkmen Wiktionary

I request sysop access.

Thank you. Erdemsenol 01:02, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Please note that this user is banned from tr.wp for being a sockpuppeteer (recently) and from en.wp for being a meatpuppet (a year ago).--Vito Genovese 01:03, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Request denied. this prove it wouldn't be a good idea to give sysop bit to this person. DarkoNeko 12:13, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

I request sysop access.

Thank you. Erdemsenol 01:02, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Please note that this user is banned from tr.wp for being a sockpuppeteer (recently) and from en.wp for being a meatpuppet (a year ago).--Vito Genovese 01:29, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Please read user Devrimdpt'smassage called About Turkish Wikipedia, on Jimbo Wales's discussion page, and ask White Cat this dispute. Because he/she can translate this page. My dispute didin't solution but he and his friend banned me. Three sysop and community said He isn't sockpuppet or meatpuppet. And alot of user in Türkish Wikipedia complained Vito Genovese alot of time, but Bureaucrat Dbl2010 isn't doing anything. All problem is that: He doesn't like me.
And here you can read a steward's opinion abuot my en:Wiki account.
Also, thees are difrent projects and difrent languages
Best regards--Erdemsenol 12:02, 10 June 2007 (UTC)


Request denied. this prove it wouldn't be a good idea to give sysop bit to this person. DarkoNeko 12:13, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Not done, in such circumstances you will be promoted only after a proper RfAs. Besides, tkwiki already has three sysops. And removing other user's comments related to you IS NOT going to help you. MaxSem 12:16, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Simple English Wikibooks

I request sysop access for 12 hours to delete the backlog.

Thank you. Wikihermit 01:46, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Done, Expires in 12 hours--Shanel 01:51, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Akan Wikibooks

I request sysop access.

The only sysop there's inactive, and I need to go in and delete the junk. Thank you. --Ralsurr 12:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Done. Expires June 25, 2007.--Shanel 03:51, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Tibetan Wikipedia

I request temporary sysop access to clean up spam and deletion candidates.

Thank you. MF-Warburg(de) 16:19, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Done. Expires June 25, 2007.--Shanel 03:54, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Lithuanian Wiktionary

I request sysop access for cleaning up the accumulated garbage, because Lithuanian Wiktionary dont have syops.

Thank you. Vpovilaitis 05:22, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Done. Expires June 25, 2007.--Shanel 03:57, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

User rename requests

Miscellaneous requests

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions/2007-06&oldid=19957629"