[SECURITY] [DSA 5774-1] ruby-saml security update
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 5774-1] ruby-saml security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-5774-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
September 20, 2024                    https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : ruby-saml
CVE ID         : CVE-2024-45409
Debian Bug     : 1081560

It was discovered that ruby-saml, a SAML library implementing the client
side of a SAML authorization, does not properly verify the signature of
the SAML Response, which could result in bypass of authentication in an
application using the ruby-saml library.

For the stable distribution (bookworm), this problem has been fixed in
version 1.13.0-1+deb12u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your ruby-saml packages.

For the detailed security status of ruby-saml please refer to its
security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/ruby-saml

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=TVF9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: