[SECURITY] [DSA 5682-2] glib2.0 regression update
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 5682-2] glib2.0 regression update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-5682-2                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
May 09, 2024                          https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : glib2.0
Debian Bug     : 1070730 1070736 1070743 1070745 1070749 1070752

The update for glib2.0 released as DSA 5682-1 caused a regression in
ibus affecting text entry with non-trivial input methods. Updated
glib2.0 packages are available to correct this issue.

For the oldstable distribution (bullseye), this problem has been fixed
in version 2.66.8-1+deb11u3.

For the stable distribution (bookworm), this problem has been fixed in
version 2.74.6-2+deb12u2.

We recommend that you upgrade your glib2.0 packages.

For the detailed security status of glib2.0 please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/glib2.0

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=T+EA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: