ATK/ASPI completion · Issue #96 · w3c/html-aam · GitHub
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ATK/ASPI completion #96

Closed
LJWatson opened this issue Jun 17, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

ATK/ASPI completion #96

LJWatson opened this issue Jun 17, 2017 · 5 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@LJWatson
Copy link
Contributor

In both the role, and the state and propertey tables, there are a number of ? placeholders in the ATK/ASPI columns. These need to be updated to include actual data.

@LJWatson LJWatson added this to the WD for wide review milestone Jun 17, 2017
@jasonkiss jasonkiss added the AAM label Jan 9, 2018
@jasonkiss
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like the only entry for ATK with a ? is input@multiple. Based on the other entries, I'm assuming "Not mapped" would be correct here? @joanmarie?

@joanmarie
Copy link
Contributor

Right now, we don't really have a corresponding platform attribute or an parallel attribute. Whether or not an AT user would want to know this information is another matter entirely. That said, if all other platforms agree that this is not mapped on their platforms, I'm okay with that for mine.

@asurkov
Copy link
Contributor

asurkov commented Feb 2, 2018

@joanmarie
Copy link
Contributor

@jasonkiss and/or @LJWatson: Are you waiting for a specific pull request from me making the change from "?" to "Not mapped"?

@jasonkiss
Copy link
Contributor

@joanmarie Thanks, but no :) I've made the change.

(I also made the same change for AX, as, from what I can tell, it's not mapped there either. Might need @cookiecrook to correct that if wrong.)

Closing on the assumption that we're all good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants