[css-align][css-flexbox] Align & Flex specs disagree about fallback behavior for align-content/justify-content: space-between #2316
Labels
Comments
dholbert
changed the title
|
Given that implementations match the Flexbox spec, this looks much like a bug in the Box Alignment spec. IMO, it should have the same wording as for the 'stretch' value:
|
moz-v2v-gh
pushed a commit
to mozilla/gecko-dev
that referenced
this issue
Mar 30, 2018
…x align-self:baseline behavior. (no review, comment-only, DONTBUILD) There's been a clarification to the spec text that this comment was worried about: w3c/csswg-drafts#2316 And with that clarification, this comment is no longer applicable.
fergald
pushed a commit
to fergald/csswg-drafts
that referenced
this issue
May 7, 2018
…lign and css-flexbox. Fixes w3c#2316
gecko-dev-updater
pushed a commit
to marco-c/gecko-dev-comments-removed
that referenced
this issue
Oct 2, 2019
…x align-self:baseline behavior. (no review, comment-only, DONTBUILD) There's been a clarification to the spec text that this comment was worried about: w3c/csswg-drafts#2316 And with that clarification, this comment is no longer applicable. UltraBlame original commit: 34c6c2038fc7163d27aef4ecce09c52066ba8995
gecko-dev-updater
pushed a commit
to marco-c/gecko-dev-wordified-and-comments-removed
that referenced
this issue
Oct 2, 2019
…x align-self:baseline behavior. (no review, comment-only, DONTBUILD) There's been a clarification to the spec text that this comment was worried about: w3c/csswg-drafts#2316 And with that clarification, this comment is no longer applicable. UltraBlame original commit: 34c6c2038fc7163d27aef4ecce09c52066ba8995
gecko-dev-updater
pushed a commit
to marco-c/gecko-dev-wordified
that referenced
this issue
Oct 2, 2019
…x align-self:baseline behavior. (no review, comment-only, DONTBUILD) There's been a clarification to the spec text that this comment was worried about: w3c/csswg-drafts#2316 And with that clarification, this comment is no longer applicable. UltraBlame original commit: 34c6c2038fc7163d27aef4ecce09c52066ba8995
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The flexbox specs and alignment specs both have instructions about the fallback behavior of
justify-content: space-between, and they contradict each other.The flexbox spec says it falls back to 'flex-start':
Whereas the align spec says it falls back to 'start':
Note that 'start' and 'flex-start' sound similar but are subtly different in a flexbox context, so the distinction is important.
Could these specs be clarified to be non-contradictory on this point?
(I think the flexbox spec just needs an update.... I guess flexbox doesn't know about 'start' and 'end' keywords and the other "new" things in the css-align spec, so maybe it's tricky to reference those from flexbox. Still: the current text that I quoted above ["this value is identical to 'flex-start'"] is clearly incorrect & problematic, if the align spec is really authoritative on this point.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: