Datebase upgrade from 2.16.2 to 2.16.4 throws notices · Issue #10671 · matomo-org/matomo · GitHub
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Datebase upgrade from 2.16.2 to 2.16.4 throws notices #10671

Closed
florisluiten opened this issue Oct 4, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

Datebase upgrade from 2.16.2 to 2.16.4 throws notices #10671

florisluiten opened this issue Oct 4, 2016 · 6 comments
Labels
answered For when a question was asked and we referred to forum or answered it. Bug For errors / faults / flaws / inconsistencies etc.
Milestone
2.16.5

Comments

@florisluiten
Copy link
Contributor

When upgrading from 2.16.2 to 2.16.4 I get the following notices when upgrading the database by running "core:update".

WARNING [2016-10-04 07:35:32] (snip)/piwik/core/Updates/2.16.3-b3.php(37): Notice - Undefined variable: timezone - Piwik 2.16.4 - Please report this message in the Piwik forums: http://forum.piwik.org (please do a search first as it might have been reported already)
WARNING [2016-10-04 07:35:32] (snip)/piwik/core/Date.php(275): Notice - date_default_timezone_set(): Timezone ID '' is invalid - Piwik 2.16.4 - Please report this message in the Piwik forums: http://forum.piwik.org (please do a search first as it might have been reported already)
WARNING [2016-10-04 07:35:32] (snip)/piwik/libs/Zend/Db/Statement/Pdo.php(228): Notice - Array to string conversion - Piwik 2.16.4 - Please report this message in the Piwik forums: http://forum.piwik.org (please do a search first as it might have been reported already)
WARNING [2016-10-04 07:35:32] (snip)/piwik/libs/Zend/Db/Statement/Pdo.php(228): Notice - Array to string conversion - Piwik 2.16.4 - Please report this message in the Piwik forums: http://forum.piwik.org (please do a search first as it might have been reported already)

The upgrade succeeds, I haven't encountered any other issues.
@florisluiten
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, I found out it was already mentioned here https://forum.piwik.org/t/errors-in-update-2-16-4/21196

@mattab
Copy link
Member

mattab commented Oct 4, 2016

We keep track of bugs here, not in the forum, so it's better to leave it opened.

sgiehl added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 4, 2016
@sgiehl
fixes #10671
74abd1c
sgiehl added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 4, 2016
@sgiehl
fixes #10671
2c78543
@florisluiten florisluiten reopened this Oct 4, 2016
@florisluiten
Copy link
Contributor Author

Okay Mat, will open this issue again. Thanks!

@sgiehl
Copy link
Member

sgiehl commented Oct 4, 2016

Too late, already fixed it :trollface:

@sgiehl sgiehl closed this as completed Oct 4, 2016
@sgiehl sgiehl added this to the 2.17.0 milestone Oct 4, 2016
@sgiehl sgiehl added the Bug For errors / faults / flaws / inconsistencies etc. label Oct 4, 2016
@mattab mattab modified the milestones: 2.16.5, 2.17.0 Oct 4, 2016
@mattab
Copy link
Member

mattab commented Oct 4, 2016

Piwik 2.16.5 has been released and fixes this issue. In case your Scheduled reports are not working anymore you may have to re-create them manually, or you can also restore the table piwik_report (containing your Scheduled reports definition) from a backup if you have one. We are sorry for any inconvenience caused.

@florisluiten
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you @mattab and @sgiehl for your quick response!

@mattab mattab added the answered For when a question was asked and we referred to forum or answered it. label Oct 26, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
answered For when a question was asked and we referred to forum or answered it. Bug For errors / faults / flaws / inconsistencies etc.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.16.5
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@mattab @sgiehl @florisluiten