この議論の根底には、問題としている規則が言語に存在するという仮説がある。の英語

Basic to the argument is the assumption that the rules in question are present in the language.

The argument is based on false data.

That problem is still being debated.

The argument is logical―illogical.

That issue is debatable.

A discussion of the proposal seems to be in order.

Your argument is illogical

You are not governed by logic.

This idea is the basis of my argument.

The argument is contrary to reason―against reason.

Her idea solved a critical problem in ELT.

What is significant in this argument is that his theory can identify those phenomena.

To solve the difficult problem, we should engage in a well‐reasoned debate.

Here the authors touch on the central methodological issue.

Assuming the statement to be true, your argument does not hold water.

Your argument, pushed to its extreme, becomes Bolshevism.

The discussion has changed my thinking about the issue

What is the basis for the argument?

Let's not argue for the sake of arguing.

an argument that appears good at first view but is really fallacious

This question must be discussed separately from that one.

the argument was essentially a technical one

Such argument have weight with the masses―have force with the masses.

The examples used in this article make use of a Pascal-like pseudocode.

Such arguments have force with the masses.

We have to admit that there was an aporia in our debate.

Originalism means that the U.S. Constitution should be interpreted as the authors wrote it.

a debatable argument

Your argument is illogical

You are not governed by logic.