Crop classification accuracy as influenced by training strategy, data transformation and spatial resolution of data | Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing Skip to main content
Log in

Crop classification accuracy as influenced by training strategy, data transformation and spatial resolution of data

  • Published:
Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The possibility of improving classification accuracies using different training strategies and data transformations within the framework of a supervised maximum likelihood classification scheme was explored in this study. The effect of spatial resolution of data on the accuracy of classification was also studied Single-pixel training strategy resulted in improved classification accuracy over the block-training method. Data transformations gave no significant improvements in accuracy over untransformed data. There was a reduction in classification accuracy as resolution of data improved from 72 m (LISS I) to 36 m (LISS II) while other sensor characteristics remained same.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Campbell J B (1981). Spatial correlation effects upon accuracy of supervised classification of land cover, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 47(3): 355–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuveico E and Congalton R G (1988). Using clustering analysis to improve the selection of training statistics in classifying remotely sensed data, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 54(9): 1275–1281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educational and psychological measurement, 20(1): 37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig R G (1979). Autocorrelation in Landsat data, In Proc. 13th Int. Symp. Remote Sensing Environ., ERIM (Ann Arbor. Michigan), pp. 1517–1524.

  • Cushnie J L (1987). The interactive effect of spatial resolution and degree of internal variability within land-cover types on classification accuracies, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 8(1): 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dadhwal V K and Parihar J S (1985). Estimation of 1983–84 wheat acreage of Karnal district (Haryana) using Landsat MSS digital data, Scientific Note, IRSUP/SAC/CPF/SN/09/85.

  • Dadhwal V K, Parihar J S, Ruhal D S, Jarwal S D, Medhavy T T, Khera A P and Singh J (1989). Effect of acquisition date and TM spectral bands on wheat mustard and gram classification accuracies, J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 17(4): 19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss J L, Cohen J and Everitt B S (1969). Large sample standard errors of Kappa and weighted Kappa, Psychological bulletin, 72(5): 323–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong P and Howarth P J (1990). An assessment of some factors influencing multispectral land cover classification, Photogramm. Engg. Remote Sensing, 56(5): 597–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hixson M, Scholz D, Fuhs N and Akiyama T (1980). Evaluation of several schemes for classification of remotely sensed data, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 46(12): 1547–1553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labovitz M L and Masuoka E J (1984). The influence of autocorrelation in signature extraction—an example from a geobotanical investigation of Cotter basin, Montana, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 5(2): 315–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medhavy T T, Dadhwal V K, Parihar J S, Ruhal D S, Khera A P, Jarwal S D and Singh J (1989). Use of single acquisition IRS LISS I digital data for preharvest wheat acreage (1988–89) estimation in Haryana, Scientific Note, RSAM/SAC/CAPE/SN/18/89.

  • Ruhal D S, Dadhwal V K, Parihar J S, Jarwal S D, Medhavy T T, Singh J and Khera A P (1988). Studies on within crop variability in wheat using Landsat TM data, In Proc. National Symp. Remote Sensing in Rural Development, Nov. 17–19, 1988, Hisar, pp. 199–208.

  • Ruhal D S, Medhavy T T, Jarwal S D, Dadhwal V K, Khera A P and Parihar J S (1990). District-level wheat acreage estimation in Haryana using IRS LISS I digital data, In Proc. National Symp. Remote Sensing for Agricultural Applications, Dec. 6–8, New Delhi, pp. 250–255.

  • Shimoda H and Sakata T (1988). Accuracy of land use classification for SPOT image data, SPOT-1 Image Utilisation, Assessment Results, Cepadues Edition, Toulouse, France, pp. 631–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toll D L (1985). Effect of Landsat TM, sensor parameters on land cover classification, Remote Sensing Environ., 17(2): 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams D L, Irons J R, Markham B L, Nelson R F and Toll D L (1983). Impact of TM sensor characteristics on classification accuracy, In Proc. IGARSS '83, San Francisco, California, pp. PS 1 5.1–5.9.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Medhavy, T.T., Sharma, T., Dubey, R.P. et al. Crop classification accuracy as influenced by training strategy, data transformation and spatial resolution of data. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 21, 21–28 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03020114

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03020114

Keywords

Navigation