Abstract
The possibility of improving classification accuracies using different training strategies and data transformations within the framework of a supervised maximum likelihood classification scheme was explored in this study. The effect of spatial resolution of data on the accuracy of classification was also studied Single-pixel training strategy resulted in improved classification accuracy over the block-training method. Data transformations gave no significant improvements in accuracy over untransformed data. There was a reduction in classification accuracy as resolution of data improved from 72 m (LISS I) to 36 m (LISS II) while other sensor characteristics remained same.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Campbell J B (1981). Spatial correlation effects upon accuracy of supervised classification of land cover, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 47(3): 355–363.
Chuveico E and Congalton R G (1988). Using clustering analysis to improve the selection of training statistics in classifying remotely sensed data, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 54(9): 1275–1281.
Cohen J (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educational and psychological measurement, 20(1): 37–46
Craig R G (1979). Autocorrelation in Landsat data, In Proc. 13th Int. Symp. Remote Sensing Environ., ERIM (Ann Arbor. Michigan), pp. 1517–1524.
Cushnie J L (1987). The interactive effect of spatial resolution and degree of internal variability within land-cover types on classification accuracies, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 8(1): 15–29.
Dadhwal V K and Parihar J S (1985). Estimation of 1983–84 wheat acreage of Karnal district (Haryana) using Landsat MSS digital data, Scientific Note, IRSUP/SAC/CPF/SN/09/85.
Dadhwal V K, Parihar J S, Ruhal D S, Jarwal S D, Medhavy T T, Khera A P and Singh J (1989). Effect of acquisition date and TM spectral bands on wheat mustard and gram classification accuracies, J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 17(4): 19–24.
Fleiss J L, Cohen J and Everitt B S (1969). Large sample standard errors of Kappa and weighted Kappa, Psychological bulletin, 72(5): 323–327.
Gong P and Howarth P J (1990). An assessment of some factors influencing multispectral land cover classification, Photogramm. Engg. Remote Sensing, 56(5): 597–603.
Hixson M, Scholz D, Fuhs N and Akiyama T (1980). Evaluation of several schemes for classification of remotely sensed data, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 46(12): 1547–1553.
Labovitz M L and Masuoka E J (1984). The influence of autocorrelation in signature extraction—an example from a geobotanical investigation of Cotter basin, Montana, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 5(2): 315–332.
Medhavy T T, Dadhwal V K, Parihar J S, Ruhal D S, Khera A P, Jarwal S D and Singh J (1989). Use of single acquisition IRS LISS I digital data for preharvest wheat acreage (1988–89) estimation in Haryana, Scientific Note, RSAM/SAC/CAPE/SN/18/89.
Ruhal D S, Dadhwal V K, Parihar J S, Jarwal S D, Medhavy T T, Singh J and Khera A P (1988). Studies on within crop variability in wheat using Landsat TM data, In Proc. National Symp. Remote Sensing in Rural Development, Nov. 17–19, 1988, Hisar, pp. 199–208.
Ruhal D S, Medhavy T T, Jarwal S D, Dadhwal V K, Khera A P and Parihar J S (1990). District-level wheat acreage estimation in Haryana using IRS LISS I digital data, In Proc. National Symp. Remote Sensing for Agricultural Applications, Dec. 6–8, New Delhi, pp. 250–255.
Shimoda H and Sakata T (1988). Accuracy of land use classification for SPOT image data, SPOT-1 Image Utilisation, Assessment Results, Cepadues Edition, Toulouse, France, pp. 631–636.
Toll D L (1985). Effect of Landsat TM, sensor parameters on land cover classification, Remote Sensing Environ., 17(2): 129–140.
Williams D L, Irons J R, Markham B L, Nelson R F and Toll D L (1983). Impact of TM sensor characteristics on classification accuracy, In Proc. IGARSS '83, San Francisco, California, pp. PS 1 5.1–5.9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Medhavy, T.T., Sharma, T., Dubey, R.P. et al. Crop classification accuracy as influenced by training strategy, data transformation and spatial resolution of data. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 21, 21–28 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03020114
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03020114