Research Article
An Analytical Study of Computation and Communication Tradeoffs in Distributed Graph
@ARTICLE{10.4108/eai.17-12-2015.150810, author={Amirreza Abdolrashidi and Lakshmish Ramaswamy}, title={An Analytical Study of Computation and Communication Tradeoffs in Distributed Graph}, journal={EAI Endorsed Transactions on Collaborative Computing}, volume={1}, number={5}, publisher={EAI}, journal_a={CC}, year={2015}, month={12}, keywords={Distributed Vertex-Centric Graph Processing, Performance Modeling, Parallel Processing, Graph Partitioning.}, doi={10.4108/eai.17-12-2015.150810} }
- Amirreza Abdolrashidi
Lakshmish Ramaswamy
Year: 2015
An Analytical Study of Computation and Communication Tradeoffs in Distributed Graph
CC
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.17-12-2015.150810
Abstract
Distributed vertex-centric graph processing systems such as Pregel, Giraph and GPS have acquired significant popularity in recent years. Although the manner in which graph data is partitioned and placed on the computational nodes has considerable impact on the performance of the vertex-centric graph processing cluster, there are very few comprehensive studies on this topic. Towards enhancing our understanding of this important factor, in this paper, we propose a novel model for analyzing the performance of such clusters. Using three graph algorithms as case studies, we also characterize the inherent tradeoff between the computational load distribution and the communication overheads of a BSP cluster. This paper also reports a detailed experimental study investigating the performance of commonly-used graph partitioning mechanisms with respect to their computational load distribution characteristics and the associated communication overheads.
Copyright © 2015 Amirreza Abdolrashidi and Lakshmish Ramaswamy, licensed to EAI. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0/), which permits unlimited use, distribution and reproduction in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.