Abstract
To address questions about human memory’s dependence on the coincidental environmental contexts in which events occur, we review studies of incidental environmental context-dependent memory in humans and report a meta-analysis. Our theoretical approach to the issue stems from Glenberg’s (1997) contention that introspective thought (e.g., remembering, conceptualizing) requires cognitive resources normally used to represent the immediate environment. We propose that if tasks encourage processing of noncontextual information (i.e., introspective thought) at input and/or at test, then both learning and memory will be less dependent on the ambient environmental contexts in which those activities occur. The meta-analysis showed that across all studies, environmental context effects were reliable, and furthermore, that the use of noncontextual cues during learning (overshadowing) and at test (outshining), as well as mental reinstatement of appropriate context cues at test, all reduce the effect of environmental manipulations. We conclude that environmental context-dependent memory effects are less likely to occur under conditions in which the immediate environment is likely to be suppressed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Balsam, P. D., &Tomie, A. (Eds.) (1985).Context and learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bilodeau, I. M., &Schlosberg, H. (1951). Similarity in stimulating conditions as a variable in retroactive inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology,41, 199–204.
Bjork, R. A., &Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1988). On the puzzling relationship between environmental context and human memory. In C. Izawa (Ed.),Current issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Flowerree Symposium on Cognition (pp. 313–344). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Blaney, P. H. (1986). Affect and memory: A review.Psychological Bulletin,99, 229–246.
Blaxton, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 657–668.
Block, R. A. (1982). Temporal judgments and contextual change.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 530–544.
Bower, G. H. (1972). Stimulus-sampling theory of encoding variability. In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.),Coding processes in human memory (pp. 85–123). Washington, DC: Winston.
Bower, G. H., &Cohen, P. R. (1982). Emotional influences in memory and thinking: Data and theory. In M. S. Clark & S. T. Fiske (Eds.),Affect and cognition (pp. 263–289). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cann, A., &Ross, D. A. (1989). Olfactory stimuli as context cues in human memory.American Journal of Psychology,102, 91–102.
Carr, H. A. (1925).A study of mental activity. New York: Longmans, Green.
Chalfonte, B. L., &Johnson, M. K. (1996). Feature memory and binding in young and older adults.Memory & Cognition,24, 403–416.
Chappell, M., &Humphreys, M. S. (1994). An auto-associative neural network for sparse representations: Analysis and application to models of recognition and cued recall.Psychological Review,101, 103–128.
Cohen, J. (1977).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
Cousins, R., &Hanley, R. (1996). The effect of environmental context on recall and category clustering scores following relational and individual item processing: A test of the outshining hypothesis.Memory,4, 79–90.
Dallett, K., &Wilcox, S. G. (1968). Contextual stimuli and proactive inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology,78, 475–480.
Dalton, P. (1993). The role of stimulus familiarity in context-dependent recognition.Memory & Cognition,21, 223–234.
Dulsky, S. G. (1935). The effect of a change of background on recall and relearning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 725–740.
Eckert, E., Kanak, N. J., &Stevens, R. (1984). Memory for fre quency as a function of environmental context.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,22, 507–510.
Eich, [J.] E. (1985). Context, memory, and integrated item/context imagery.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 764–770.
Eich, [J.] E. (1989). Theoretical issues in state dependent memory. In H. L. Roediger III and F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 331–354). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Eich, [J.] E. (1995). Mood as a mediator of place dependent memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 293–308.
Eich, J. M. (1982). A composite holographic associative recall model.Psychological Review,89, 627–661.
Farnsworth, P. R. (1934). Examinations in familiar and unfamiliar surroundings.Journal of Social Psychology,5, 128–129.
Fernandez, A., &Glenberg, A. M. (1985). Changing environmental context does not reliably affect memory.Memory & Cognition,13, 333–345.
Geiselman, R. E., &Bjork, R. A. (1980). Primary versus secondary rehearsal in imagined voices: Differential effects on recognition.Cognitive Psychology,12, 188–205.
Geiselman, R. E., &Glenny, J. (1977). Effects of imagining speakers’ voices on the retention of words presented visually.Memory & Cognition,5, 499–504.
Glenberg, A. M. (1979). Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition.Memory & Cognition,7, 95–112.
Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,20, 1–55.
Glenberg, A. M., Schroeder, J. L., &Robertson, D. A. (1998). Averting the gaze disengages the environment and facilitates remembering.Memory & Cognition,26, 651–658.
Godden, D. R., &Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: Land and underwater.British Journal of Psychology,66, 325–331.
Godden, D. R., &Baddeley, A. D. (1980). When does context influence recognition memory?British Journal of Psychology,71, 99–104.
Greenspoon, J., &Ranyard, R. (1957). Stimulus conditions and retroactive inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology,53, 55–59.
Hedges, L. V., &Olkin, I. (1985).Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,95, 528–551.
Humphreys, M. S., Bain, J. D., &Pike, R. (1989). Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory for episodic, semantic, and procedural tasks.Psychological Review,96, 208–233.
Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 21–38.
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.
Kolers, P. A., &Roediger, H. L., III (1984). Procedures of mind.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 425–449.
Krafka, C., &Penrod, S. (1985). Reinstatement of context in a field experiment on eyewitness identification.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,49, 58–69.
Malpass, R. S., &Devine, P. G. (1981). Guided memory in eyewitness identification.Journal of Applied Psychology,66, 343–350.
Matzel, L. D., Schachtman, T. R., &Miller, R. R. (1985). Recovery of an overshadowed association achieved by extinction of the overshadowing stimulus.Learning & Motivation,16, 398–412.
Mazur, J. E. (1986).Learning and behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
McGeoch, J. A. (1942).The psychology of human learning. New York: Longmans.
McSpadden, M., Schooler, J. W., &Loftus, E. F. (1988). Here today, gone tomorrow: The appearance and disappearance of context effects. In D. M. Thomson & G. M. Davies (Eds.),Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 215–230). New York: Wiley.
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., &Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 519–533.
Murdock, B. B. (1997). Context and mediators in a theory of distributed associative memory (TODAM2).Psychological Review,104, 839–862.
Murnane, K., &Phelps, M. P. (1993). A global activation approach to the effect of changes in environmental context on recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 882–894.
Murnane, K., &Phelps, M. P. (1994). When does a different environmental context make a difference in recognition? A global activation model.Memory & Cognition,22, 584–590.
Murnane, K., &Phelps, M. P. (1995). Effects of changes in relative cue strength on context-dependent recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 158–172.
Pan, S. (1926). The influence of contextual conditions upon learning and recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,9, 468–491.
Pessin, J. (1932). The effect of similar and dissimilar conditions upon learning and relearning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,15, 427–435.
Raaijmakers, J. G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory.Psychological Review,88, 93–134.
Rand, G., &Wapner, S. (1967). Postural status as a factor in memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,6, 268–271.
Reed, H. J. (1931). The influence of a change of conditions upon the amount recalled.Journal of Experimental Psychology,14, 632–649.
Saufley, W. H., Jr.,Otaka, S. R., &Bavaresco, J. L. (1985). Context effects: Classroom tests and contextual independence.Memory & Cognition,13, 522–528.
Smith, S. M. (1979). Remembering in and out of context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 460–471.
Smith, S. M. (1982). Enhancement of recall using multiple environmental contexts during learning.Memory & Cognition,10, 405–412.
Smith, S. M. (1984). A comparison of two techniques for reducing context-dependent forgetting.Memory & Cognition,12, 477–482.
Smith, S. M. (1985). Environmental context and recognition memory reconsidered.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,23, 173–176.
Smith, S. M. (1986). Environmental context-dependent recognition memory using a short-term memory task for input.Memory & Cognition,14, 347–354.
Smith, S. M. (1988). Environmental context-dependent memory. In D. M. Thomson & G. M. Davies (Eds.),Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 13–34). New York: Wiley.
Smith, S. M. (1994). Theoretical principles of context-dependent memory. In P. Morris & M. Gruneberg (Eds.),Theoretical aspects of memory (Aspects of Memory, 2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 168–195). New York: Routledge.
Smith, S. M. (1995). Mood is a component of mental context: Comment on Eich (1995).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 309–310.
Smith, S. M., Glenberg, A. [M.], &Bjork, R.A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory.Memory & Cognition,6, 342–353.
Smith, S. M., Heath, F. R., &Vela, E. (1990). Environmental context-dependent homophone spelling.American Journal of Psychology,103, 229–242.
Smith, S. M., &Sinha, A. K. (1987).Effect of brief immersion in a flotation tank on memory and cognition (Tech. Rep. No. CSCS-004). College Station, TX: Texas A&M University, Committee for the Study of Cognitive Science.
Smith, S. M., & Vela, E. (1986, November).Outshining: The relative effectiveness of cues. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
Smith, S. M., &Vela, E. (1992). Environmental context-dependent eyewitness recognition.Applied Cognitive Psychology,6, 125–139.
Smith, S. M., Vela, E., &Williamson, J. E. (1988). Shallow input processing does not induce environmental context-dependent recognition.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,26, 537–540.
Strand, B. Z. (1970). Change of context and retroactive inhibition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,9, 202–206.
Tulving, E. (1983).Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tulving, E., &Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review,80, 359–380.
Ucros, C. G. (1989). Mood state-dependent memory: A meta-analysis.Cognition & Emotion,3, 139–169.
Weiss, W., &Margolius, G. (1954). The effect of context stimuli on learning and retention.Journal of Experimental Psychology,48, 318–322.
Wright, D. L., &Shea, C. H. (1991). Contextual dependencies in motor skills.Memory & Cognition,19, 361–370.
References for the meta-analysis
Bell, P. A., Hess, S., Hill, E., Kukas, S. L., Richards, R.W., &Sargent, D. (1984). Noise and context-dependent memory.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,22, 99–100.
Bilodeau, I. M., &Schlosberg, H. (1951). Similarity in stimulating conditions as a variable in retroactive inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology,41, 199–204.
Canas, J. J., &Nelson, D. L. (1986). Recognition and environmental context: The effect of testing by phone.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,24, 407–409.
Cohen, R. L., Peterson, M., Mantini-Atkinson, T. (1987). Inter-event differences in event memory: Why are some events more recallable than others?Memory & Cognition,15, 109–118.
Cousins, R., &Hanley, R. (1996). The effect of environmental context on recall and category clustering scores following relational and individual item processing: A test of the outshining hypothesis.Memory,4, 79–90.
Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., &Martens, T. K. (1987). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Putting context into context.Journal of Applied Psychology,72, 629–637.
Dallett, K., &Wilcox, S. G. (1968). Contextual stimuli and proactive inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology,78, 475–480.
Dalton, P. (1993). The role of stimulus familiarity in context-dependent recognition.Memory & Cognition,21, 223–234.
Devane, J. R., &Parkman, R. A. (1978). Effects of imagery instructions when the context is changed.Perceptual & Motor Skills,46, 716–718.
Dolinsky, R., &Zabrucky, K. (1983). Effects of environmental context changes on memory.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,21, 423–426.
Eich, [J.] E. (1985). Context, memory, and integrated item/context imagery.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 764–770.
Eich, [J.] E. (1995). Mood as a mediator of place dependent memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 293–308.
Emmerson, P. G. (1986). Effects of environmental context on recognition in an unusual environment.Perceptual & Motor Skills,63, 1047–1050.
Fernandez, A., &Glenberg, A. M. (1985). Changing environmental context does not reliably affect memory.Memory & Cognition,13, 333–345.
Fisher, R. P., Geiselman, R. E., MacKinnon, D. P., &Holland, H. L. (1984). Hypnotic and cognitive interviews to enhance the memory of eyewitnesses to crime.International Journal of Investigative & Forensic Hypnosis,7, 28–31.
Glenberg, A. M. (1979). Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition.Memory & Cognition,7, 95–112.
Godden, D. R., &Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: Land and underwater.British Journal of Psychology,66, 325–331.
Godden, D. R., &Baddeley, A. D. (1980). When does context influence recognition memory?British Journal of Psychology,71, 99–104.
Greenspoon, J., &Ranyard, R. (1957). Stimulus conditions and retroactive inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology,53, 55–59.
Humphreys, M. S., Pike, R., Bain, J. D., &Tehan, G. (1988). Using multilist designs to test for contextual reinstatement effects in recognition.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,26, 200–202.
Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 21–38.
Jensen, L. [C.], Dibble, J., &Anderson, D. C. (1971). Effects of a contextual change upon retroactive inhibition.Psychological Reports,29, 39–46.
Jensen, L. C., Harris, K., &Anderson, D. C. (1971). Retention following a change in ambient contextual stimuli for six age groups.Developmental Psychology,4, 394–399.
Krafka, C., &Penrod, S. (1985). Reinstatement of context in a field experiment on eyewitness identification.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,49, 58–69.
Malpass, R. S., &Devine, P. G. (1981). Guided memory in eyewitness identification.Journal of Applied Psychology,66, 343–350.
McDaniel, M. A., &Anderson, C. D., Einstein, G. O., &O’Halloran, C. M. (1988). Modulation of environmental reinstatement effects through encoding strategies.American Journal of Psychology,102, 523–548.
McSpadden, M., Schooler, J. W., &Loftus, E. F. (1988). Here today, gone tomorrow: The appearance and disappearance of context effects. In D. M. Thomson & G. M. Davies (Eds.),Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 215–230). New York: Wiley.
Nagge, J. W. (1935). An experimental test of the theory of associative interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 663–682.
Nixon, S. J., &Kanak, N. J. (1981). The interactive effects of instructional set and environmental context changes on the serial position effect.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,18, 237–240.
Sanders, G. L. (1984). Effects of context cues on eyewitness identification responses.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,14, 386–397.
Smith, S. M. (1979). Remembering in and out of context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 460–471.
Smith, S. M. (1982). Enhancement of recall using multiple environmental contexts during learning.Memory & Cognition,10, 405–412.
Smith, S. M. (1984). A comparison of two techniques for reducing context-dependent forgetting.Memory & Cognition,12, 477–482.
Smith, S. M. (1985a). Effects of number of study environments and learning instructions on free-recall clustering and accuracy.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,23, 440–442.
Smith, S. M. (1985b). Environmental context and recognition memory reconsidered.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,23, 173–176.
Smith, S. M. (1986). Environmental context-dependent recognition memory using a short-term memory task for input.Memory & Cognition,14, 347–354.
Smith, S. M., &Glenberg, A. [M.], &Bjork, R. A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory.Memory & Cognition,6, 342–353.
Smith, S. M., &Vela, E. (1992). Environmental context-dependent eyewitness recognition.Applied Cognitive Psychology,6, 125–139.
Smith, S. M., Vela, E., &Williamson, J. E. (1988). Shallow input processing does not induce environmental context-dependent recognition.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,26, 537–540.
Strand, B. Z. (1970). Change of context and retroactive inhibition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,9, 202–206.
Wilhite, S. C. (1991). Evidence of a negative environmental reinstatement effect.British Journal of Psychology,82, 325–342.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, S.M., Vela, E. Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8, 203–220 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196157
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196157